Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

Multi-attribute group decision making methods with proportional 2-tuple linguistic assessments and weights

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 August 2014
  • Volume 7, pages 758–770, (2014)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Multi-attribute group decision making methods with proportional 2-tuple linguistic assessments and weights
Download PDF
  • Cong-Cong Li1 &
  • Yucheng Dong1 
  • 96 Accesses

  • 16 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The proportional 2-tuple linguistic model provides a tool to deal with linguistic term sets that are not uniformly and symmetrically distributed. This study further develops multi-attribute group decision making methods with linguistic assessments and linguistic weights, based on the proportional 2-tuple linguistic model. Firstly, this study defines some new operations in proportional 2-tuple linguistic model, including weighted average aggregation operator with linguistic weights, ordered weighted average operator with linguistic weights and the distance between proportional linguistic 2-tuples. Then, four multi-attribute group decision making methods are presented. They are the method based on the proportional 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operator, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) with proportional 2-tuple linguistic information, elimination et choice translating reality (ELECTRE) with proportional 2-tuple linguistic information, preference ranking organization methods for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) with proportional 2-tuple linguistic information. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

A proportional linguistic distribution based model for multiple attribute decision making under linguistic uncertainty

Article 09 December 2016

Distribution Linguistic Trust Propagation and Aggregation Based on Numerical Scale and Archimedean t−norm

Article 20 April 2024

Picture 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making

Article 20 October 2016

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Analytical Philosophy of Language
  • Linguistic Anthropology
  • Mixed Methods
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP)
  • Philosophical Methods
  • Psychological Methods
  • Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Group Decision-Making Techniques

References

  1. A. Albadvi, S.K. Chaharsooghi and A. Esfahanipour, Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177 (2007) 673–683.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Alonso, F.J. Cabrerizo, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, Group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 24(2) (2009) 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J. Alcalá-Fdez and C. Porcel, A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(2) (2008) 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Behzadian, R.B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvim and M. Aghdasi, PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200 (2010) 198–215.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Benayoun, B. Roy and N. Sussmann, Manual de reference du programme electre. Note De Synthese et Formation, No. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, France, 1966.

  6. F.J. Cabrerizo, S. Alonso and E. Herrera-Viedma, A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information, Int. J. Inf. Tech. Decis. Making 8(1) (2009) 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F.J. Cabrerizo, I.J. Pérez and E. Herrera-Viedma, Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information, Knowl.- Based Syst. 23 (2010) 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera and S. Alonso, Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182(1) (2007) 383–399.

  9. R. Degani and G. Bortolan, The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making, Int. J. Approx. Reason 2(2) (1988) 98–162.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Delgado, J.L. Verdegay and M.A. Vila, On aggregation operations of linguistic labels, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 8(3) (1993) 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y.C. Dong, W.C. Hong, Y.F. Xu and S. Yu, Selecting the individual numerical scale and prioritization method in the analytic hierarchy process: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 19 (2011) 13–25.

  12. Y.C. Dong, Y.F. Xu, H.Y. Li and B. Feng, The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203 (2010) 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y.C. Dong, Y.F. Xu and S. Yu, Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17 (2009) 1366–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y.C. Dong, Y.F. Xu and S. Yu, Linguistic multi-person decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009) 603–623.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Espinilla, J. Liu and L. Martínez, An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems, Comput. Intell. 27(3) (2011) 489–512.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Z.P. Fan, B. Feng and W.L. Suo, A fuzzy linguistic method for evaluating collaboration satisfaction of NPD team using mutual-evaluation information, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 122(2) (2009) 547–557.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Greco, M. Kadzinski, V. Mousseau, R. Slowinski, ELECTREGKMS: robust ordinal regression for outranking methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214(1) (2011) 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Hermans, J. Erickson, T. Noordewier, A. Sheldon and M. Kline, Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multi-criteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont, J. Environ. Manage. 84 (2007) 534–546.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Herrera, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana and E. Herrera-Viedma, Computing with words in decision-making: Foundations, trends and prospects, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 8(4) (2009) 337–364.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst. 27(5) (1997) 646–656.

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 115(1) (2000) 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and L. Martínez, A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16(2) (2008) 354–370.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and J.L. Verdegay, Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79(2) (1996) 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, A 2-tupie fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8(6) (2000) 746–752.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multi-granularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B, Cybern. 31(2) (2001) 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, The 2-tuple linguistic computational model advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency, Int. J. Unc. Fuzz. Knowl.-Based Syst. 9(suppl.) (2001) 33–48.

  27. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. J. Cabrerizo, I. J. Pérez, M. J. Cobo, S. Alonso and F. Herrera, Applying Linguistic OWA Operators in Consensus Models under Unbalanced Linguistic Information, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Comp. 265 (2011) 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. Herrera-Viedma and A.G. López-Herrera, A model of information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 22(11) (2007) 1197–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.L. Hwang and K.P. Yoon, Multiple attributes decision-making methods and applications, Heidelberg: Springer, 1981.

  30. J. Lawry, An alternative approach to computing with words, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzz. 11(9) (2001) 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Lu, J. Ma, G. Zhang, Y. Zhu, X. Zeng and L. Koehl, Theme-based comprehensive evaluation in new product development using fuzzy hierarchical criteria group decision-making method, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58(6) (2011) 2236–2246.

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Martínez, M. Espinilla, J. Liu, L.G. Pérez and P.J. Sánchez, An evaluation model with unbalanced linguistic information applied to olive oil sensory evaluation, J. Multi-Valued Log. S. 15 (2009) 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Martínez, M. Espinilla and L.G. Pérez, A linguistic multigranular sensory evaluation model for olive oil, Int. J. Comp. Intell. Syst. 1(2) (2008) 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L. Martínez and F. Herrera, An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges, Inf. Sci. 207 (2012) 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. Martínez, J. Liu, D. Ruan and J.B. Yang, Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes, Inf. Sci. 177(7) (2007) 1533–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. Martínez, D. Ruan and F. Herrera, Computing with words in decision support systems: An overview on models and applications, Int. J. Comp. Intell. Syst. 3(4) (2010) 382–395.

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Massanet, J.V. Riera, J. Torrens and E. Herrera-Viedma, A new linguistic computational model based on discrete fuzzy numbers for computing with words, Inf. Sci. 258 (2014) 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.M. Marzouk, ELECTRE III model for value engineering applications, Automat. Constr. 20 (2011) 596–600.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. M. Mendel, Historical reflections and new positions on perceptual computing, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 8(4) (2009) 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.M. Mendel and D. Wu, Perceptual computing: Aiding people in making subjective judgments, New Jersey: IEEE Press and John Wiley, 2010.

  41. D. Meng and Z. Pei, On weighted unbalanced linguistic aggregation operators in group decision making, Inf. Sci. 223 (2013) 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  42. R.M. Rodríguez and L. Martínez, An analysis of symbolic linguistic computing models in decision making, Int. J. Gen. Syst. 42(1) (2013) 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  43. R.M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez and F. Herrera, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setsfor decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1) (2012) 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.H. Wang and J.Y. Hao, A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(3) (2006) 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J.H. Wang and J.Y. Hao, An approach to computing with words based on canonical characteristic values of linguistic labels, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(4) (2007) 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  46. J.H. Wang and J.Y. Hao, Fuzzy linguistic PERT, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(2) (2007) 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Z.S. Xu, A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations, Inf. Sci. 166 (2004) 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  48. L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning, Part I, Inf. Sci. 8 (1975) 199–249.

    Google Scholar 

  49. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy logic = computing with words, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4 (1996) 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  50. G. Zhang, J. Ma and J. Lu, Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system, Stoch Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 23(4) (2009) 517–527.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, P.R. China

    Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong

Authors
  1. Cong-Cong Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yucheng Dong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yucheng Dong.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, CC., Dong, Y. Multi-attribute group decision making methods with proportional 2-tuple linguistic assessments and weights. Int J Comput Intell Syst 7, 758–770 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2014.960232

Download citation

  • Received: 26 March 2013

  • Accepted: 25 February 2014

  • Published: 01 August 2014

  • Issue date: August 2014

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2014.960232

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • multi-attribute group decision making
  • proportional 2-tuple linguistic model
  • linguistic weights
  • TOPSIS
  • ELECTRE
  • PROMETHEE

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature