Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy LINMAP-Based Compromising Approach for Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making with Preference Over Alternatives

  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 April 2020
  • Volume 13, pages 444–463, (2020)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy LINMAP-Based Compromising Approach for Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making with Preference Over Alternatives
Download PDF
  • Jih-Chang Wang1 &
  • Ting-Yu Chen2 
  • 180 Accesses

  • 15 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

This paper presents a new compromising approach to multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) for the treatment of uncertainty which is based on Pythagorean fuzzy (PF) sets. The present work intends to propose a novel linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) by way of some useful concepts related to PF dominance relations, individual consistency and inconsistency levels, and individual fit measurements. The concept of PF scalar function-based dominance measures is defined to conduct intracriterion comparisons concerning uncertain evaluation information based on Pythagorean fuzziness; moreover, several valuable properties are also investigated to demonstrate its effectiveness. For the assessment of overall dominance of alternatives, this paper provides a synthetic index, named a comprehensive dominance measure, which is the aggregation of the weighted dominance measures by combining unknown weight information and PF dominance measures of various criteria. For each decision-maker, this paper employs the proposed measures to evaluate the individual levels of rank consistency and rank inconsistency regarding the obtained overall dominance relations and the decision-maker’s preference comparisons over paired alternatives. In the framework of individual fit measurements, this paper constructs bi-objective mathematical programming models and then provides their corresponding parametric linear programming models for generating the best compromise alternative. Realistic applications with some comparative analyses concerning railway project investment are implemented to demonstrate the appropriateness and usefulness of the proposed methodology in addressing actual MCGDM problems.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Logical Analysis
  • Mathematics in Business, Economics and Finance
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Operations Research and Decision Theory
  • Polytopes
  • Utilitarianism
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Uncertain Environments

References

  1. V. Srinivasan, A.D. Shocker, Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preference, Psychometrika. 38 (1973), 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.-Y. Quan, Z.-L. Wang, H.-C. Liu, H. Shi, A hybrid MCDM approach for large group green supplier selection with uncertain linguistic information, IEEE Access. 6 (2018), 50372–50383.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.H. Haghighi, S.M. Mousavi, V. Mohagheghi, A new soft computing model based on linear assignment and linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Appl. Soft Comput. 77 (2019), 780–796.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.-J. Zuo, D.-F. Li, G.-F. Yu, L.-P. Zhang, A large group decision-making method and its application to the evaluation of property perceived service quality, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 37 (2019), 1513–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  5. X. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Qu, L. Zhang, Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic mathematical programming method for MAGDM based on Shapley values and incomplete preference information, IEEE Access. 6 (2018), 74162–74179.

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Gou, Z. Xu, H. Liao, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic possibility degree-based linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision-making, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making. 18 (2019), 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Song, J. Zhu, S. Zhang, X. Liu, A multi-stage uncertain risk decision-making method with reference point based on extended LINMAP method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35 (2018), 1133–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.-P. Wan, D.-F. Li, Fuzzy mathematical programming approach to heterogeneous multiattribute decision-making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees, Inf. Sci. 325 (2015), 484–503.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.-P. Wan, Z. Jin, J.-Y. Dong, Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for multi-attribute group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees, Knowl. Inf. Syst. 55 (2018), 437–466.

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. Zhang, Z. Xu, Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives, Comput. Indus. Eng. 75 (2014), 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.-P. Wan, D.-F. Li, Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22 (2014), 300–312.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Zhang, Y. Ju, X. Liu, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy programming technique for multicriteria group decision making based on Shapley values and incomplete preference information, Soft Comput. 21 (2016), 5787–5804.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Zhang, Y. Ju, X. Liu, M. Giannakis, A mathematical programming-based method for heterogeneous multicriteria group decision analysis with aspirations and incomplete preference information, Comput. Indus. Eng. 113 (2017), 541–557.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.-P. Wan, Y.-L. Qin, J.-Y. Dong, A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees, Knowl. Based Syst. 138 (2017), 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y.J. Xu, A. W. Xu, H.M. Wang, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference for multi-attribute group decision making, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 7 (2016), 845–855.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Liao, L. Jiang, Z. Xu, J. Xu, F. Herrera, A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information, Inf. Sci. 415–416 (2017), 341–355.

  17. J. Qin, X. Liu, W. Pedrycz, A multiple attribute interval type-2 fuzzy group decision making and its application to supplier selection with extended LINMAP method, Soft Comput. 21 (2017), 3207–3226.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Haktanır, C. Kahraman, A novel interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy QFD method and its application to solar photovoltaic technology development, Comput. Indus. Eng. 132 (2019), 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, in Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, 2013, pp. 57–61.

  20. R.R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22 (2014), 958–965.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.R. Yager, Properties and applications of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, in: P. Angelov, S. Sotirov (Eds.), Imprecision and Uncertainty in Information Representation and Processing, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 332, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016, pp. 119–136.

  22. R.R. Yager, A.M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28 (2013), 436–452.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.S.A. Khan, The Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein Choquet integral operators and their application in group decision making, Comput. Appl. Math. 38 (2019), 128.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y.-L. Lin, L.-H. Ho, S.-L. Yeh, T.-Y. Chen, A Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method based on novel correlation measures and its application to multiple criteria decision analysis of inpatient stroke rehabilitation, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 12 (2019), 410–425.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.-C. Wang, T.-Y. Chen, Multiple criteria decision analysis using correlation-based precedence indices within Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain environments, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11 (2018), 911–924.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Xue, Z. Xu, X. Zhang, X. Tian, Pythagorean fuzzy LINMAP method based on the entropy theory for railway project investment decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33 (2018), 93–125.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Liu, X. Zhang, Comment on Pythagorean and complex fuzzy set operations, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26 (2018), 3902–3904.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Zeng, D. Li, Q. Yin, Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33 (2018), 2236–2254.

    Google Scholar 

  29. X. Zhang, Z. Xu, Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29 (2014), 1061–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  30. X. Peng, Y. Yang, Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 30 (2015), 1133–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  31. X. Zhang, Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods, Inf. Sci. 330 (2016), 104–124.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Li, W. Zeng, Distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33 (2018), 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  33. T.-Y. Chen, A novel PROMETHEE-based outranking approach for multiple criteria decision analysis with Pythagorean fuzzy information, IEEE Access. 6 (2018), 54495–54506.

    Google Scholar 

  34. T.-Y. Chen, Novel generalized distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and a compromise approach for multiple criteria decision analysis under uncertainty, IEEE Access. 7 (2019), 58168–58185.

    Google Scholar 

  35. T.-Y. Chen, A novel PROMETHEE-based method using a Pythagorean fuzzy combinative distance-based precedence approach to multiple criteria decision making, Appl. Soft Comput. 82 (2019), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. F.K. Gündoǧdu, A spherical fuzzy extension of MULTIMOORA method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 38 (2020), 963–978.

  37. S. Mete, Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 25 (2019), 1645–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  38. N.E. Oz, S. Mete, F. Serin, M. Gul, Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: an extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 25 (2019), 1615–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. Pérez-Domínguez, L.A. Rodríguez-Picón, A. Alvarado-Iniesta, D. Luviano Cruz, Z. Xu, MOORA under Pythagorean fuzzy set for multiple criteria decision making, Complexity. 2018 (2018), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  40. P. Rani, A.R. Mishra, K.R. Pardasani, A. Mardani, H. Liao, D. Streimikiene, A novel VIKOR approach based on entropy and divergence measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets to evaluate renewable energy technologies in India, J. Clean. Prod. 238 (2019), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Seker, N. Aydin, Hydrogen production facility location selection for Black Sea using entropy based TOPSIS under IVPF environment, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. (2020), (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road., Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan

    Jih-Chang Wang

  2. Department of Industrial and Business Management, Chang Gung University, Graduate Institute of Business and Management, Chang Gung University, Department of Nursing, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road., Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan

    Ting-Yu Chen

Authors
  1. Jih-Chang Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ting-Yu Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting-Yu Chen.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, JC., Chen, TY. A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy LINMAP-Based Compromising Approach for Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making with Preference Over Alternatives. Int J Comput Intell Syst 13, 444–463 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200408.001

Download citation

  • Received: 21 August 2019

  • Accepted: 04 April 2020

  • Published: 23 April 2020

  • Version of record: 23 April 2020

  • Issue date: January 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200408.001

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • Compromising approach
  • Group decision-making
  • Pythagorean fuzzy set
  • LINMAP
  • Dominance measure

Profiles

  1. Ting-Yu Chen View author profile

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature