Brett Michael J.D. ⏳
Simplifying Intellectual Property(IP) and Law School Admissions 1L at StetsonLaw
TikTok
TikTok
Instagram
Instagram
Starbucks Corp. v. Wolfe's Borough Coffee, (Charbucks) :: Justia
Starbucks Corp. v. Wolfe's Borough Coffee, (Charbucks) :: Justia
Starbucks filed suit against Black Bear claiming, among other things, trademark dilution in violation of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA), 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), 1127. The district court denied Starbucks request for an injunction, concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that Black Bear's "Charbucks" marks at issue were likely to dilute Starbucks' famous "Starbucks" marks. The court concluded that the district court did not err in its factual findings that there was only a minimal degree of similarity between the Starbucks marks and the Charbucks marks and that Starbucks demonstrated only a weak association between the marks. Balancing the section 1125(c)(2)(B) factors and other facts that bear on a likelihood of dilution, the court agreed with the district court that Starbucks failed to show that Black Bear's use of its marks in commerce was likely to dilute the Starbucks marks. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Starbucks v. Sambucks
Starbucks v. Sambucks
NY Graffiti Artists Win 6.7M Lawsuit 🎨
NY Graffiti Artists Win 6.7M Lawsuit 🎨
Inside the St. Pete Mural Scene 🎨
Inside the St. Pete Mural Scene 🎨
The annual SHINE® St. Petersburg Mural Festival features over 150 murals throughout downtown and the surrounding arts districts since 2015.
TikTok
TikTok
Instagram
Instagram
View on mobile
