October 24, 2018
| By: |
Caselli, Francesco; Manning, Alan |
| Abstract: |
Existing economic models show how new technology can cause large changes in relative wages and inequality. But there are also claims, based largely on verbal expositions, that new technology can harm workers on average or even all workers. This paper shows – under plausible assumptions – that new technology is unlikely to cause wages for all workers to fall and will cause average wages to rise if the prices of investment goods fall relative to consumer goods (a condition supported by the data). We outline how results may change with different assumption s. |
| JEL: |
J1 |
|
|
| URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:87371&r=ltv |
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by maximorossi
October 24, 2018
| By: |
Stefanie Stantcheva (Harvard University); Edoardo Teso (Harvard University); Alberto Alesina (Harvard University) |
| Abstract: |
Using newly collected cross-country survey and experimental data, we investigate how beliefs about intergenerational mobility affect preferences for redistribution in five countries: France, Italy, Sweden, U.K., and U.S.. Americans are more optimistic than Europeans about intergenerational mobility, and too optimistic relative to actual mobility. Our randomized treatment that shows respondents pessimistic information about mobility increases support for redistribution, mostly for equality of opportunity policies. A strong political polarization exists: Left-wing respondents are more pessimistic about intergenerational mobility, their preferences for redistribution are correlated with their mobility perceptions, and they respond to pessimistic information by increasing support for redistribution. None of these apply to right-wing respondents, possibly because of their extremely negative views of government. |
|
|
| URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:red:sed017:1635&r=ltv |
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by maximorossi
October 24, 2018
| By: |
Shyamal Chowdhury; Matthias Sutter; Klaus F. Zimmermann |
| Abstract: |
Economic preferences – like time, risk and social preferences – have been shown to be very influential for real-life outcomes, such as educational achievements, labor market outcomes, or health status. We contribute to the recent literature that has examined how and when economic preferences are formed, putting particular emphasis on the role of intergenerational transmission of economic preferences within families. Our paper is the first to run incentivized experiments with fathers and mothers and their children by drawing on a unique dataset of 1,999 members of Bangladeshi families, including 911 children, aged 6-17 years, and 544 pairs of mothers and fathers. We find a large degree of intergenerational persistence as the economic preferences of mothers and fathers are significantly positively related to their children’s economic preferences. Importantly, we find that socio-economic status of a family has no explanatory power as soon as we control for parents’ economic preferences. A series of robustness checks deals with the role of older siblings, the similarity of parental preferences, and the average preferences within a child’s village. |
| Keywords: |
intergenerational transmission of preferences, time preferences, risk preferences, social preferences, children, parents, Bangladesh, socio-economic status, experiment |
| JEL: |
C90 D10 D90 D81 D64 J13 J24 J62 |
|
|
| URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6914&r=ltv |
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by maximorossi
October 24, 2018
| By: |
D’Ambrosio, Conchita (University of Luxembourg); Clark, Andrew E. (Paris School of Economics); Barazzetta, Marta (University of Luxembourg) |
| Abstract: |
We here consider the effect of the level of income that individuals consider to be fair for the job they do, which we take as measure of comparison income, on both subjective well-being and objective future job quitting. In six waves of German Socio-Economic Panel data, the extent to which own labour income is perceived to be unfair is significantly negatively correlated with subjective well-being, both in terms of cognitive evaluations (life and job satisfaction) and affect (the frequency of feeling happy, sad and angry). Perceived unfairness also translates into objective labour-market behaviour, with current unfair income predicting future job quits. |
|
|
|
|
| URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11318&r=ltv |
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by maximorossi