The protestations of ETSI, et al.
that the right to be informed of the right to
counsel does not apply to investigations before administrative bodies and that law
and jurisprudence merely give the employee the option to secure the services of
counsel in a hearing or conference
[53]
fall in light of the clear provision of Article
277 (b) of the Labor Code that
the employer xxx shall afford [the worker whose employment is
sought to be terminated] ample opportunity to be heard and to defend
himself with the assistance of his representatives if he so desiresin
accordance with company rules and regulations pursuant to guidelines
set by the Department of Labor and Employment,
and this Courts explicit pronouncement that [a]mple opportunity connotes every
kind of assistance that management must accord the employee to enable him to
prepare adequately for his defense including legal representation.
[54]
Following Agabon, et al. v. National Labor Relations Commission,
[55]
the
violation of petitioners statutory due process right entitles her to an award of
nominal damage, which this Court fixes at P30,000.
[56]
WHEREFORE, the petition is in part GRANTED.