A large database defined as a single relation may result in data duplication.
This repetition of data may result in:
o Making relations very large.
o It isn't easy to maintain and update data as it would involve searching
many records in relation.
o Wastage and poor utilization of disk space and resources.
o The likelihood of errors and inconsistencies increases.
So to handle these problems, we should analyze and decompose the
relations with redundant data into smaller, simpler, and well-structured
relations that are satisfy desirable properties. Normalization is a process of
decomposing the relations into relations with fewer attributes.
What is Normalization?
o Normalization is the process of organizing the data in the database.
o Normalization is used to minimize the redundancy from a relation or
set of relations. It is also used to eliminate undesirable characteristics
like Insertion, Update, and Deletion Anomalies.
o Normalization divides the larger table into smaller and links them using
relationships.
o The normal form is used to reduce redundancy from the database
table.
Why do we need Normalization?
The main reason for normalizing the relations is removing these anomalies.
Failure to eliminate anomalies leads to data redundancy and can cause data
integrity and other problems as the database grows. Normalization consists
of a series of guidelines that helps to guide you in creating a good database
structure
Data modification anomalies can be categorized into three types:
o Insertion Anomaly: Insertion Anomaly refers to when one cannot
A large database defined as a single relation may result
o Making relations very large.
o It isn't easy to maintain and update data as it would
involve searching many records in relation.
o Wastage and poor utilization of disk space and
resources.
o The likelihood of errors and inconsistencies
increases.
So to handle these problems, we should analyze and
decompose the relations with redundant data into
smaller, simpler, and well-structured relations that are
satisfy desirable properties. Normalization is a process of
decomposing the relations into relations with fewer
attributes.
What is Normalization?
o Normalization is the process of organizing the data in
the database.
o Normalization is used to minimize the redundancy
from a relation or set of relations. It is also used to
eliminate undesirable characteristics like Insertion,
Update, and Deletion Anomalies.
o Normalization divides the larger table into smaller
and links them using relationships.
o The normal form is used to reduce redundancy from
the database table.
Why do we need Normalization?
The main reason for normalizing the relations is removing
these anomalies. Failure to eliminate anomalies leads to
data redundancy and can cause data integrity and other
problems as the database grows. Normalization consists
of a series of guidelines that helps to guide you in
creating a good database structure
Data modification anomalies can be categorized
into three types:
o Insertion Anomaly: Insertion Anomaly refers to
when one cannot insert a new tuple into a
relationship due to lack of data.
o Deletion Anomaly: The delete anomaly refers to
the situation where the deletion of data results in the
unintended loss of some other important data.
o Updatation Anomaly: The update anomaly is when
an update of a single data value requires multiple
rows of data to be updated.
Types of Normal Forms:
Normalization works through a series of stages called
Normal forms. The normal forms apply to individual
relations. The relation is said to be in particular normal
form if it satisfies constraints.
Following are the various types of Normal forms:
Normal Description
Form
1NF A relation is in 1NF if it contains an atomic value.
2NF A relation will be in 2NF if it is in 1NF and all non-
key attributes are fully functional dependent on
the primary key.
3NF A relation will be in 3NF if it is in 2NF and no
transition dependency exists.
BCNF A stronger definition of 3NF is known as Boyce
Codd's normal form.
4NF A relation will be in 4NF if it is in Boyce Codd's
normal form and has no multi-valued dependency.
5NF A relation is in 5NF. If it is in 4NF and does not
contain any join dependency, joining should be
lossless.
Advantages of Normalization
o Normalization helps to minimize data redundancy.
o Greater overall database organization.
o Data consistency within the database.
o Much more flexible database design.
o Enforces the concept of relational integrity.
Disadvantages of Normalization
o You cannot start building the database before
knowing what the user needs.
o The performance degrades when normalizing the
relations to higher normal forms, i.e., 4NF, 5NF.
o It is very time-consuming and difficult to normalize
relations of a higher degree.
o Careless decomposition may lead to a bad database
design, leading to serious problems.
First Normal Form (1NF)
o A relation will be 1NF if it contains an atomic value.
o It states that an attribute of a table cannot hold
multiple values. It must hold only single-valued
attribute.
o First normal form disallows the multi-valued
attribute, composite attribute, and their
combinations.
Example: Relation EMPLOYEE is not in 1NF because of
multi-valued attribute EMP_PHONE.
EMPLOYEE table:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_PHONE EMP_STATE
14 John 7272826385, UP
9064738238
20 Harry 8574783832 Bihar
12 Sam 7390372389, Punjab
8589830302
The decomposition of the EMPLOYEE table into 1NF has
been shown below:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_PHONE EMP_STATE
14 John 7272826385 UP
14 John 9064738238 UP
20 Harry 8574783832 Bihar
12 Sam 7390372389 Punjab
12 Sam 8589830302 Punjab
Second Normal Form (2NF)
o In the 2NF, relational must be in 1NF.
o In the second normal form, all non-key attributes are
fully functional dependent on the primary key
Example: Let's assume, a school can store the data of
teachers and the subjects they teach. In a school, a
teacher can teach more than one subject.
TEACHER table
TEACHER_ID SUBJECT TEACHER_AGE
25 Chemistry 30
25 Biology 30
47 English 35
83 Math 38
83 Computer 38
In the given table, non-prime attribute TEACHER_AGE is
dependent on TEACHER_ID which is a proper subset of a
candidate key. That's why it violates the rule for 2NF.
To convert the given table into 2NF, we decompose it into
two tables:
TEACHER_DETAIL table:
TEACHER_ID TEACHER_AGE
25 30
47 35
83 38
TEACHER_SUBJECT table:
TEACHER_ID SUBJECT
25 Chemistry
25 Biology
47 English
83 Math
83 Computer
Third Normal Form (3NF)
o A relation will be in 3NF if it is in 2NF and not contain
any transitive partial dependency.
o 3NF is used to reduce the data duplication. It is also
used to achieve the data integrity.
o If there is no transitive dependency for non-prime
attributes, then the relation must be in third normal
form.
A relation is in third normal form if it holds atleast one of
the following conditions for every non-trivial function
dependency X → Y.
1. X is a super key.
2. Y is a prime attribute, i.e., each element of Y is part
of some candidate key.
Example:
EMPLOYEE_DETAIL table:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_ZIP EMP_STATE EMP_CITY
222 Harry 201010 UP Noida
333 Stephan 02228 US Boston
444 Lan 60007 US Chicago
555 Katharine 06389 UK Norwich
666 John 462007 MP Bhopal
Super key in the table above:
1. {EMP_ID}, {EMP_ID, EMP_NAME}, {EMP_ID, EMP_NA
ME, EMP_ZIP}....so on
Candidate key: {EMP_ID}
Non-prime attributes: In the given table, all
attributes except EMP_ID are non-prime.
Here, EMP_STATE & EMP_CITY dependent on EMP_ZIP
and EMP_ZIP dependent on EMP_ID. The non-prime
attributes (EMP_STATE, EMP_CITY) transitively
dependent on super key(EMP_ID). It violates the rule
of third normal form.
That's why we need to move the EMP_CITY and
EMP_STATE to the new <EMPLOYEE_ZIP> table, with
EMP_ZIP as a Primary key.
EMPLOYEE table:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_ZIP
222 Harry 201010
333 Stephan 02228
444 Lan 60007
555 Katharine 06389
666 John 462007
EMPLOYEE_ZIP table:
EMP_ZIP EMP_STATE EMP_CITY
201010 UP Noida
02228 US Boston
60007 US Chicago
06389 UK Norwich
462007 MP Bhopal
Boyce Codd normal form (BCNF)
o BCNF is the advance version of 3NF. It is stricter than
3NF.
o A table is in BCNF if every functional dependency X →
Y, X is the super key of the table.
o For BCNF, the table should be in 3NF, and for every
FD, LHS is super key.
Example: Let's assume there is a company where
employees work in more than one department.
EMPLOYEE table:
EMP_COUNT EMP_DEP DEPT_TY EMP_DEPT_
RY T PE NO
EMP_I
D
264 India Designin D394 283
g
264 India Testing D394 300
364 UK Stores D283 232
364 UK Developi D283 549
ng
In the above table Functional dependencies are as
follows:
1. EMP_ID → EMP_COUNTRY
2. EMP_DEPT → {DEPT_TYPE, EMP_DEPT_NO}
Candidate key: {EMP-ID, EMP-DEPT}
The table is not in BCNF because neither EMP_DEPT nor
EMP_ID alone are keys.
To convert the given table into BCNF, we decompose it
into three tables:
EMP_COUNTRY table:
EMP_ID EMP_COUNTRY
264 India
264 India
EMP_DEPT table:
EMP_DEPT DEPT_TYPE EMP_DEPT_NO
Designing D394 283
Testing D394 300
Stores D283 232
Developing D283 549
EMP_DEPT_MAPPING table:
EMP_ID EMP_DEPT
D394 283
D394 300
D283 232
D283 549
Functional dependencies:
1. EMP_ID → EMP_COUNTRY
2. EMP_DEPT → {DEPT_TYPE, EMP_DEPT_NO}
Candidate keys:
For the first table: EMP_ID
For the second table: EMP_DEPT
For the third table: {EMP_ID, EMP_DEPT}
Now, this is in BCNF because left side part of both the
functional dependencies is a key.
Relational Decomposition
o When a relation in the relational model is not in
appropriate normal form then the decomposition of a
relation is required.
o In a database, it breaks the table into multiple tables.
o If the relation has no proper decomposition, then it
may lead to problems like loss of information.
o Decomposition is used to eliminate some of the
problems of bad design like anomalies(something
that is different from what is normal or usual) ,
inconsistencies, and redundancy.
Types of Decomposition
Lossless Decomposition
o If the information is not lost from the relation that is
decomposed, then the decomposition will be lossless.
o The lossless decomposition guarantees that the join
of relations will result in the same relation as it was
decomposed.
o The relation is said to be lossless decomposition if
natural joins of all the decomposition give the
original relation.
Example:
EMPLOYEE_DEPARTMENT table:
EMP_I EMP_NA EMP_A EMP_CI DEPT_I DEPT_NA
D ME GE TY D ME
22 Denim 28 Mumbai 827 Sales
33 Alina 25 Delhi 438 Marketin
g
46 Stephan 30 Bangal 869 Finance
ore
52 Katherin 36 Mumbai 575 Productio
e n
60 Jack 40 Noida 678 Testing
The above relation is decomposed into two relations
EMPLOYEE and DEPARTMENT
EMPLOYEE table:
EMP_ID EMP_NAME EMP_AGE EMP_CITY
22 Denim 28 Mumbai
33 Alina 25 Delhi
46 Stephan 30 Bangalore
52 Katherine 36 Mumbai
60 Jack 40 Noida
DEPARTMENT table
DEPT_ID EMP_ID DEPT_NAME
827 22 Sales
438 33 Marketing
869 46 Finance
575 52 Production
678 60 Testing
Now, when these two relations are joined on the common
column "EMP_ID", then the resultant relation will look like:
Employee ⋈ Department
EMP_ EMP_NA EMP_A EMP_CI DEPT_ DEPT_NA
ID ME GE TY ID ME
22 Denim 28 Mumb 827 Sales
ai
33 Alina 25 Delhi 438 Marketin
g
46 Stephan 30 Bangal 869 Finance
ore
52 Katherin 36 Mumb 575 Producti
e ai on
60 Jack 40 Noida 678 Testing
Hence, the decomposition is Lossless join decomposition.
Dependency Preserving
o It is an important constraint of the database.
o In the dependency preservation, at least one
decomposed table must satisfy every dependency.
o If a relation R is decomposed into relation R1 and R2,
then the dependencies of R either must be a part of
R1 or R2 or must be derivable from the combination
of functional dependencies of R1 and R2.
o For example, suppose there is a relation R (A, B, C,
D) with functional dependency set (A->BC). The
relational R is decomposed into R1(ABC) and R2(AD)
which is dependency preserving because FD A->BC
is a part of relation R1(ABC).
Atomic values are the smallest possible units of data that can be
stored in a database. They cannot be further divided or
decomposed into smaller parts. For example, a phone number is
an atomic value, but a name is not, because it can be split into
first name and last name.
Functional Dependency in DBMS
A functional dependency occurs when the value of one attribute (or a set of
attributes) uniquely determines the value of another attribute. This
relationship is denoted as:
X→Y
Here, X is the determinant, and Y is the dependent attribute. This means that
for each unique value of X, there is precisely one corresponding value of Y.
Consider a table named Students with the following attributes:
StudentID StudentName StudentAge
101 Rahul 23
102 Ankit 22
103 Aditya 22
104 Sahil 24
105 Ankit 23
The above table has the following functional dependencies
StudentID -> StudentName
StudentID -> StudentAge
Note that the functional dependencies StudentName -> StudentAge or
StudentAge -> StudentName Do not hold.
How to represent functional dependency in DBMS?
Functional dependency is expressed in the form of equations. For
example, if we have an employee record with fields "EmployeeID",
"FirstName" and "LastName" we can specify the function as follows:
EmployeeID -> FirstName, LastName
To represent functional dependency in DBMS has two main features: left
(LHS) and right (RHS) of the arrow (->).
For example, if we have a table with attributes "X", "Y" and "Z" and the
attribute "X" can determine the value of the attributes "Y" and "Z".
X -> Y, Z
This symbol indicates that the value in property "X" determines the values
in property "Y" and "Z". So if you know the value of "X", you can also
determine the value of "Y" and "Z".
Benefits of Functional Dependency in DBMS
The concept of normalization is based on functional dependencies. Using
functional dependencies, we break a table in multiple tables that helps us in
preventing duplicate data and hence Improves Data Quality, less errors and
better database design.