0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views2 pages

Metric Spaces: Schwarz Inequality Explained

The document presents definitions and theorems related to metric spaces. Theorem 1 proves the Schwarz inequality, which states that the inner product of two vectors is less than or equal to the product of their magnitudes. Corollary 2 derives the triangle inequality from Theorem 1. Corollary 3 is a generalization of Corollary 2. Definitions 4 and 7 define the Cartesian product of sets as the set of all ordered pairs or tuples with elements from each set.

Uploaded by

Prerit Terway
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views2 pages

Metric Spaces: Schwarz Inequality Explained

The document presents definitions and theorems related to metric spaces. Theorem 1 proves the Schwarz inequality, which states that the inner product of two vectors is less than or equal to the product of their magnitudes. Corollary 2 derives the triangle inequality from Theorem 1. Corollary 3 is a generalization of Corollary 2. Definitions 4 and 7 define the Cartesian product of sets as the set of all ordered pairs or tuples with elements from each set.

Uploaded by

Prerit Terway
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Elementary theory of metric spaces

Theorem 1 (Schwarz inequality) Let x = (x1 , ..., xN ) and y = (y1 , ..., yN ) be elements of RN . Then: X X 1 X 1 2 2 N N N 2 2 x y x y . i i i=1 i i i=1 i=1 PN
i=1 (yi

Proof. Dene f : R R, f () =

f () =

Note that since the equation depends on and not x or y , we can rearrange the equation as: f () = a2 b + c and nd the that minimizes f . There are two possible cases: PN (a) a = 0. If a = 0 then i=1 x2 i = 0, which is equal to having xi = 0 i. Then, X X 1 X 1 2 2 N N N 2 2 xi yi i=1 xi yi i=1 i=1 X X 1 X 1 2 2 N N N 2 0 yi i=1 0 yi i=1 i=1 00

XN

xi )2 . Note that f () 0 . Also, XN


i=1

i=1

2 yi 2

xi yi + 2

XN

i=1

x2 i.

And the expression is satised. (b) a 6= 0. The value of that minimizes f satises f 0 ( ) = 0. Then, f 0 () = 2a b 2a b = 0 b = 2a It follows that f ( ) is: f ( ) = a = = b 2a 2 b 2a

+c

ab2 b2 +c 4a2 2a b2 b2 +c 4a 2a = b2 +c 4a

b b +4ac 0; therefore, b2 4ac. Recalling the values of a, b, But since f () 0 then 4 a + c 0 and 4a and c: X X 2 X N N N 2 2 2 xi yi 4 xi yi i=1 i=1 i=1

Taking square roots, and noting that x2 = |x|,

There are two useful derivations of this result.

X X 1 X 1 2 2 N N N 2 2 x y x y . i i i i i=1 i=1 i=1

Corollary 2 (Triangle inequality) Let x = (x1 , ..., xN ) and y = (y1 , ..., yN ) be elements of RN . Then: r r r XN XN XN 2 2 2. (xi + yi ) xi + yi
i=1 i=1 i=1

Proof. Note that:

P P 1 P 1 N N N 2 2 2 2 From Theorem 1 we know that i=1 xi yi = . Substituting: i=1 xi i=1 yi XN


i=1

XN

i=1

(xi + yi )2 =

XN

i=1

x2 i +2

XN

i=1

xi yi +

XN

i=1

2 yi .

(xi + yi )2 = x2 i +2

XN

i=1

= since PN

i=1

P xi yi is just a particular (and valid) case of N i=1 xi yi . Taking square roots: r XN


i=1

r XN

XN
N i=1

i=1

x2 i +2

x2 i

1 X 2 N

XN

i=1

xi yi + 1 2

XN

i=1

2 yi

i=1

x2 i

i=1

x2 i +

r XN

y2 i=1 i

!2

XN

i=1

2 yi

(xi + yi )

r XN

x2 i=1 i

r XN

y2 . i=1 i

Proof. Set xi = ai bi , yi = bi ci . Then, by Corollary 2, r r r XN XN XN 2 2 ((ai bi ) + (bi ci )) (ai bi ) + (bi ci )2 .


i=1 i=1 i=1

Corollary 3 Let a = (a1 , ..., aN ), b = (b1 , ..., bN ), c = (c1 , ..., cN ) be elements of RN . Then, r r r XN XN XN 2 2 (ai ci ) (ai bi ) + (bi ci )2 .
i=1 i=1 i=1

Denition 4 (Cartesian product) Let S and T be sets. The cartesian product of S and T , denoted as S T , is the set of all ordered pairs (p, q ) in which p belongs to S and q belongs to T : S T = {(p, q )|p S, q T } . Remark 5 Almost generally, S T 6= T S . Example 6 Let S = {1, 2} and T = {1, 3}. Then S T = {(1, 1), (1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 3)}. However, the product T S is dierent, since T S = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (3, 1), (3, 2)}. Denition 7 The cartesian product of any nite number of sets S1 , ..., SM is the set of ordered N-tuples (p1 , ..., pN ) in which pi Si , i = {1, ..., N }. This is denoted by: ON
i=1

Si .

You might also like