ACTION RESEARCH
SCHOOL YEAR 2018 - 2019
DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF E – LEARNING SOFTWARE
AND INSTRUCTIONAL DEVICES
KRISTINA CARLA G. RENIVA, Ed.D, FRIEdr.
JUANA A. ARVESU
JEANETTE R. MILLENA
Magdalena Integrated National High School
ABSTRACT
Keywords: development and assessment, instructional device and e –
learning software.
The purpose of the study is to develop and assess different E – learning
software and instructional devices in Araling Panlipunan 10. For the
development of the e – learning projects, different software development tools
were used. Selected sections in Grade 10 became the study participants. The
students under investigation were given Pre – Test and Post – Test to get
Mean Percentage Score. Upon completion of the requirements needed in
developing the projects, a validated instrument to measure the students’
attitude towards e – learning was used to determine the project’s
acceptability. All the students’ were asked to evaluate the project before and
after implementation. Findings shows that Mean Percentage Score increases
when supplemented the instruction with the use of e – learning programs and
instructional devices while, the attitudes of the students towards e – learning
program increases after the used of the software.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
“A thankful heart is not just the greatest virtue but the mother of all the virtues”
- CICERO
To all of the people that help us in the completion of this project, our sincerest
gratitude and felicitations.
CONTEXT AND RATIONALE
There are many definitions of e – learning across literature. Wetling
(2000) and Rosenberg (2001) defined e – learning as utilization of Internet
and related tools and technologies to provide a broad range of solutions that
improves performance and knowledge. E – learning is the term widely used to
refer to instructional material or learning practice disseminated or supported
by electronic tools and technologies (Ong, 2004).
According to Philipps (2001), classroom are being equipped with the
latest computer technology for the faculty to use the latest software, E –
learning materials, incorporate electronic presentations into their teaching,
presenting video, connect to the internet, and other training devices and
equipment. Clearly, a major goal of all instruction is for the student to be able
to retain as much knowledge of the subject as possible through the use of
technologies (Custodio, 2000).
The development and design of e –learning can assist and enhance
the teaching – learning process.
Teachers and students can carry forward their work through an E –
learning software (Custodio, 2000) in ways that are similar to and tightly
intertwined with the traditional ways that they learn, teach and study in
libraries, classrooms, laboratories, seminars and conferences. The developed
e – learning software was also used to instruct the student where the
computer contains the instruction which is designed to teach, guide and test
the student until a desired level of proficiency is attained. When it is
successfully integrated becomes a resource that is used seamlessly and on a
regular basis by teachers and students to implement goals and objectives of
the curriculum.
Along with increasing inclination towards E – learning within
academics, it is very necessary to identify perspectives of E – learning from
the ultimate stakeholders, the students. This paper tries to examine Grade 10
Araling Panlipunan students’ perception about the developed E – learning
software and instructional device.
INNOVATION, INTERVENTION AND STRATEGY
In this study the researcher focused on the development and
assessment of different E – learning software and Instructional devices in
Araling Panlipunan 10. Different software development tools were used in
developing E – learning projects like Adobe Flash CS4 for special effects and
animations, [Link] for the interface design and Adobe Photoshop CS3 for
graphics enhancement.
Web development tools were used in developing the AP online, one of
the E- learning projects made. HTML, CSS, Java Script, AJAX and JQuery
were used for its front end; MySQL for the data base as back end of the
system; and for designs and other features, Camtasia 7.0, Adobe Photoshop
CS5 and Adobe Image Ready CS2 were used.
In developing the instructional devices, several operational hardware
requirements were considered. Specific electronic tools and components were
integrated in the project after analyzing the lessons and activities included in
Araling Panlipunan 10 second quarter.
The researcher conducted an interview to the students served as the
respondents to evaluate their attitudes towards the E – learning software.
ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The main purpose of this study is to develop and assess an E –
learning software and instructional devices for Araling Panlipunan. The
specific questions are:
1. What is the students’ attitude towards the E – learning software and
instructional devices before and after the implementation?
2. What is the Mean Percentage Score (MPS) in the Pre – test and
Post – Test?
3. Is there a difference between the students’ attitudes towards the E
learning software and instructional devices before and after the
implementation?
4. Is there a difference between the Mean Percentage Score in the
Pre – test and Post – test?
5. Does the developed E – learning software and instructional devices
helps in the improvement of students’ performance in post - test?
ACTION RESEARCH METHODS
The researcher selected three sections of Grade 10 students at
Magdalena Integrated National High School. The three sections were
purposively selected because the three had similar characteristics in terms of
intellectual capability. All the students in two sections were employed in the
study. Section A had thirty six (36) students, while Section B comprises of
thirty eight (38) students then, Section C had a thirty five (35) students a total
of one hundred nine (109) students under investigation in this study. All the
students had permission from the parents and all the personal information
were treated with utmost confidentiality.
This study used a descriptive method of research, for the development
of E – learning and instructional devices, System Development Life Cycle
(SDLC) model was used. It is a technique that divides complex projects into
an easily manage phases. The researcher started in the process of
developing the project in the first phase, followed by planning, design,
development, testing, implementation and maintenance phase. These phases
provided the researcher flexible guidelines in developing the E – learning
software and instructional devices.
In determining the students’ attitude towards E – learning software and
instructional devices the researcher used the Rosenberg and Fishbein model
about attitudes and behavior. The students validated the E – learning program
and instructional devices in terms of time management, e –learning teaching
efficiency, needs for technical advancement, schedule flexibility and reducing
cost. The instruments were given before and after the exposure to the said
software and devices.
A Pre – test and Post – test was administered in order to assess the
effectiveness of the developed E – learning software and instructional
devices. The Mean Percentage Score of both tests were treated statistically to
find the difference between the two.
Data were tabulated and analyzed using weighted mean and standard
deviation. To determine the difference between the students’ attitude before
and after the implementation and the mean percentage score in pre – test and
post – test paired sample T – test were utilized.
To determine the association between the developed E – learning
software and instructional devices to the students’ performance in pre – test
and post – test, chi square test of independence were utilized.
DISCUSSIONS OF RESULTS AND REFLECTIONS
Students’ attitude towards e – learning before and after the
implementation
To assess the acceptability level of the developed e – learning software
and instructional devices in teaching selected topics in Araling Panlipunan 10
second quarter the researcher evaluated the students’ attitude towards the
program before the exposure to the software. It was evident in Table 1 that
the respondents disagree that the e – learning software and instructional
devices offers the possibility to efficiently managed time and an efficient
instructional method of teachers. Also, according to them the e – learning
software and instructional devices is not a learning environment that needs
advanced technical and knowledge used manifested by the mean of 2.23.
While, as said by the same students the developed e – learning software and
instructional devices does not assures schedule flexibility and it cannot
reduced educational cost.
After the students’ exposure to the developed software the same
survey instrument was given to measure the students’ attitudes towards the
program that validate the level of acceptability of the said innovation. Table 2
showed that the students’ agrees with the statement in the questionnaire
revealing that the developed e – learning offers the possibility to efficiently
manage their time and an efficient instructional method the teachers’ used.
Students also agree that e – learning software and instructional devices
needs advanced technical and knowledge used. E – Learning assures
schedule flexibility and reduced educational cost.
The data presented manifests that the theory of Muzaffer was indeed
reliable about the acceptance and rejection region. According to the theory if
changes was introduced to certain group of individuals the first reaction was
to reject it but as the process continue they will learn how to accept the
changes. This is what happened to the Grade 10 students, at the initial
implementation of the program the students’ attitude towards the program is
negative and the acceptability level is low but after the exposure to the said
program the students’ attitudes towards the program becomes positive and
the level of acceptability increases. The findings indicated that the E –
learning software and instructional devices was accepted by the student
respondents evident by the increase in students’ attitudes towards E –
learning before and after the exposure.
Sanders and Shelter (2001) observed attitude of undergraduate
students towards the web – enabled learning components in Biology course.
The outcomes exhibited a constructive influence on critical thinking skills,
problem – solving skills and student learning. The finding is in parallel to the
above mentioned findings because both observed an attitude of the students
to the E – learning software while, the present study used the Grade 10
students the latter study used a college student nonetheless both exhibited a
student learning.
Mean Percentage Score (MPS) result of pre – test and post - test
The researcher claimed that the e – learning software and devices was
an effective innovation to increase students’ learning on the selected topics in
Araling Panlipunan 10 Mga Kontemporaryong Isyu. To validate such
conclusion the researcher followed the pre – test and post –test design. The
pre – test was given before the using of the said program whiles the post –
test was given after the implementation of the e – learning program. Using the
Department of Education’s calculation of the individual Mean Percentage
Score (MPS) same with the National Achievement Test (NAT) table 3
revealed an increase in the students’ individual MPS. The pre – test
registered a 47.64% MPS implied that the students had an average mastery
before the lesson. Upon giving the post – test and increase in the individual
MPS was registered evidenced by 70.12% implying the moving towards
mastery performance.
An increase in the performance can be attributed to the exposure of the
Grade 10 students in the developed e – learning software and instructional
devices. In this method the students were given a first - hand experience for
the learning about the topic through computer – aided instruction.
Similar with the study of De Leon (2001) which concluded that
Computer Assisted Program (CAP) was effective as revealed by a significant
increase in the performance of respondents from the pre – test to post – test
in all of the content areas under study.
Difference between the students’ attitudes towards the E learning
software and instructional devices before and after the implementation
An increase in the students’ attitudes towards E – learning software
and instructional devices was evident but Table 4 showed that such increase
is significant implying that the null hypothesis of there is no significant
difference between the students’ attitudes towards E – learning software and
instructional devices is rejected at 0.05 level of confidence. This means that
the students’ attitude before the exposure to the developed E – learning
software and instructional device is negative it can be attributed to the lacking
of students’ exposure to the Computer Assisted Program in the instructional
process. After the students’ exposure to the said software and instructional
devices the students’ attitudes become positive the shift can be attributed to
the time management, teaching efficiency, technical advancement, schedule
flexibility and reducing cost feature of the developed E – learning software
and instructional devices. Therefore, the developed e – learning software and
instructional devices was accepted by the students’ respondents.
Sabah (2013) stated that positive attitudes of students towards e –
learning are scheduling, flexibility, reducing cost and time saving where
students have the opportunity to learn regardless of location or time.
However, the negative attitude of students towards e – learning is the
incapability of students to use technology tools efficiently and unavailability of
certain technologies. The study of Sabah is the same with the recent study
because both dwells of the same variables to measure students’ attitudes
towards e – learning. The recent study to measure the variable it was given
before and after implementation of the said program.
Difference between the Mean Percentage Score in the Pre – test and
Post – test
Table 5 summarizes the difference between the mean percentage
score of pre – test and post – test. There was an increase in the students’
performance in both tests but that increase is not significant. Therefore, the
null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the pre – test
and post – test result was accepted at 0.05 confidence level wherein the
computed t – value of .003 is less than the critical value of .498. This means
that even without the aid of the said developed e – learning the students’ still
perform the same in the test.
The findings can be attributed to other factors such as students’
readiness in the software and intellectual capability.
Contrary to the study of Casupanan, (2005) who determine the effect of
electronic learning approach in teaching selected topics in Physics on the
performance of College students, one of the findings stated that there is a
significant difference existed between the pre – test and post – test results of
the electronic learning group. Findings revealed that the performance of the
students improved after using training mock – up multi tester.
The difference in the findings of the two studies can be attributed to the
educational level of the respondents the present study employed Grade 10
students in Araling Panlipunan while the latter study employed college
students in Physics.
E – learning software and instructional devices helps in the
improvement of students’ performance in post – test
Table 6 summarizes the e – learning software and instructional devices
helps on the improvement of the students’ performance in pre – test and post
– test. It was presented by a factorial analysis. The null hypothesis that the
developed e – learning software and instructional devices cannot help in the
improvement of students’ performance in post – test is accepted at 0.05 level
of confidence evident by a lesser computed t – value compared to critical
value indicating a not significant association was accepted.
In terms of time management wherein the developed e – learning
software offers the possibility to the efficient management of students’ time
does not affect the students’ performance in the post – test. This means that
the students needed a guide that managed the time for them to be able to
learn.
In terms of e – learning teaching efficiency the developed e – learning
is not efficient as their teachers’ instructional method. This means that
students’ still preferred the modular method.
In terms of technical advancement the developed e – learning software
and instructional devices is an environment which needs an advanced
technical and knowledge used. This means that even without the technical
skills the students still learn the lessons presented to them.
The developed e – learning software offers schedule flexibility but the
students learned through a structured lesson guided by a budget of work. .
The developed e – learning software reduces educational cost but the
students learn in the traditional settings with a book on hand that is costly.
The researcher claimed that the demographic location is the major
factor which brought up the above – mentioned findings. The locality of the
recent study is Magdalena Integrated National High School. Magdalena,
Laguna is a fourth class municipality wherein agriculture is the main source of
income and technical skill is low due to the low socio economic profile. The
claimed was supported by the observation of Bertea (2009) that there is a
connection between technical capabilities and students’ attitudes towards e –
learning. Similar to the study of Naila (2016) the result confirmed the
readiness of the students to adopt e – learning and recognized its’ used to
education though technical support and stress of using technology were noted
to be discouraging factor to adopt e – learning. Similar to the findings in the
study of Vashney (2016) all the students demonstrated favorable attitudes
towards e – learning but rural girls showed less favorable attitudes compared
to urban girls students. Contrary to the findings of Rhema (2014) that the
demographic features such as gender differences, locality of the student,
current enrolment year and age have no effect on students’ attitude towards e
– learning.
Therefore the researcher strongly believes that teachers’ are playting a
key role in educational settings and their perception about e – learning affects
students’ attitude towards e – learning. The perception was supported by the
study of Qarwani (2010) in the engineering students at the University of
Kebangsan Malaysia. This study revealed that students prefer to study in
traditional learning approaches compared to e – learning. This implies that the
importance of e – learning is not move parallel with traditional learning
approaches and more actions are needed to improve the e – learning system.
ACTION PLAN
The result of the action research is in contrary to the widespread belief
that the computer aided instruction is a major factor for the students’
achievement. The study reveals otherwise, looking into consideration other
factors before implementing the web – based instruction.
The findings will be disseminated through conferences and publication.
The findings will also be cascaded to the policy division of the
Department of Education for archival for future references