1.
Suppose that functions f and g are defined on (0, ∞) such that limx→∞ f = ∞, and
limx→∞ g = ∞, and limx→∞ (f − g) = 0. Can you find such functions, with g(x) > 0
for all x ∈ (0, ∞), such that limx→∞ f /g = 0
√ √ √ √ √ √
Proof.√f (x) = 4 x and g(x) = x. We know 4 x and x tend to ∞ while 4 x − x and
4 √
1 √ x tend to 0 as x tends ∞ and that x ≥ 0.
x2 = x
2. Let f and g be defined on (a, ∞) such that limx→∞ f = L, and limx→∞ g = ∞. Prove that
limx→∞ f ◦ g = L
Proof. We have to show that given any > 0 there exists a number n0 such that for x > n0
we have |f (g(x)) − L| < .
We know from the given information that there exists a number n0 such that |f (x) − L| <
for x > n0 . We also know that for any number m > 0 there exists a number n1 such
that g(x) > m for x > n1 . Taking m = n0 we have g(x) > n0 for x > n1 . Therefore
|f (g(x)) − L| < for x > n1 .
3. Suppose that f is an even function of x. Does knowing that limx→2− f (x) = 7 tell you
anything about either limx→−2− f (x) or limx→−2+ f (x)?
It is given that for any > 0 there exits a δ such that |f (x) − 7| < for x for which
0 < 2 − x < δ. Choose δ 0 = min(2, δ). For δ 0 we have x > 0 therefore we can now say that
0 < 2 + (−x) < δ 0 ⇒ |f (−(−x)) − 7| <
Since f is even, we know that f (−x) = f (x) and therefore f (−(−x)) = f (−x) so we now
have
0 < 2 + (−x) < δ 0 ⇒ |f (−x) − 7| <
Putting y = −x we get
0 < 2 + y < δ 0 ⇒ |f (y) − 7| <
which is equivalent to limx→−2+ f (x)
4. Show that the following statements are equivalent to limx→a f (x) = L:
lim [f (x) − L] = 0 lim f (x + h) = L
x→a h→0
Proof. Written in − δ definition, limx→a f (x) = L becomes |f (x) − L| < as |x − a| < δ.
limx→a [f (x) − L] = 0 becomes |f (x) − L − 0| = |f (x) − L| < as |x − a| < δ, the same as
limx→a f (x) = L proving its equivalence. While limh→0 f (a+h) = L becomes |f (a+h)−L| <
as |h| < δ, then let h = x − a, making this equivalent to limx→a f (x) = L