0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views22 pages

Introduction to Philosophy of Mind

This document provides an overview of the origins and early development of philosophy. It begins by explaining that while philosophy originated in ancient Greece around 600 BCE, it also has rich traditions in other regions like India, East Asia, and the Middle East. For the first time in history, the development of agriculture freed humans from focusing solely on survival and allowed them to think leisurely and ask deep questions about the world and humanity's place in it. The earliest philosophers studied all topics, giving rise to the label "Mother of Sciences." While science now provides answers to some initial questions, philosophy remains valuable in examining questions without clear-cut answers, like those regarding ethics, love, and human nature.

Uploaded by

Arki Villaverde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views22 pages

Introduction to Philosophy of Mind

This document provides an overview of the origins and early development of philosophy. It begins by explaining that while philosophy originated in ancient Greece around 600 BCE, it also has rich traditions in other regions like India, East Asia, and the Middle East. For the first time in history, the development of agriculture freed humans from focusing solely on survival and allowed them to think leisurely and ask deep questions about the world and humanity's place in it. The earliest philosophers studied all topics, giving rise to the label "Mother of Sciences." While science now provides answers to some initial questions, philosophy remains valuable in examining questions without clear-cut answers, like those regarding ethics, love, and human nature.

Uploaded by

Arki Villaverde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UNIT # 1:​ ​Humanity and Wonder 

Table of Contents 

Introduction 3 

Lesson # 1: The B
​ irth of the Mind 
Starting Out 5
Learn about It! 5
Check Your Understanding  8 
Philosophy Applied 8 
Who’s That Philosopher? 9 

Lesson # 2: ​The Mind’s First Steps 


Starting Out 10
Learn about It! 10
Check Your Understanding 13 
Philosophy Applied 13 
Who’s That Philosopher? 14 

Lesson # 3: ​Our Minds at Work 


Starting Out 15
Learn about It! 15
Check Your Understanding 16 
Philosophy Applied 17 
Who’s That Philosopher? 18 

Be the Philosopher! 18  
Philosophy and I: Check and Reflect 20 


 ​
Wrap Up 20 
Bibliography 21 
Answers to Check your Understanding 21 
Glossary 22 


 ​
GRADE 11/12 | Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person 

UNIT # 1

Humanity and Wonder 


If  it  is  indeed  true  that,  according  to  some,  man  is  made  of  stardust,  then  we’ve  fallen 
quite  a long way from our heavenly origins. Nowadays, it isn’t uncommon to live life seemingly 
on  autopilot,  spending  our waking moments following a worn-out routine: wake up, eat, study 
or  work,  sleep,  rinse  and  repeat.  As  sobering  as  this  may  sound,  we  need  not  live  this  way. 
Many  of  the  greatest  thinkers  in  the  past  grappled  with  questions  and ideas that still concern 
us  today.  In  the  simplest sense, this is what philosophy is about—an inquiry into the nature of 
the world we live in and our place in it. All of this, of course, starts with a little bit of wonder. 

Philosophy in Our World

Believe  it  or  not,  you’ve  actually  been  philosophizing 


for  quite  some  time  now.  In  fact,  you  probably  did 
some  philosophizing  earlier  today.  As  much  as  the 
word  itself  may seem intimidating, philosophy doesn’t 
have  to  be  this  complicated  and mysterious discipline 
practiced only by professors in universities. 

When  you  persuade  your  parents  to  allow  you  to 


watch  a  movie  with  your  friends,  you  are  actually 
doing  philosophy. The same goes for the last time you 
had  to  decide  what  to  eat  for  lunch—whether  it  was 
chicken  inasal  with  unlimited  rice  or  the  slightly 
healthier  ​lumpiang  ubod​.  You  are,  in  effect,  trying  to 
understand  your  values,  where  they  came  from,  and  what  to  do  next.  Whenever  you  think 
about  the  world  and  your  place  in  it,  you  participate  in  the  philosophical  journey  which  so 
many  have  embarked  on  the past. Of course, there’s more to philosophy than can be said in a 


 ​
few paragraphs, and now’s as good a time as any to dive deeper. 

Learning Targets 

In this unit, you should be able to: 


● explain the beginnings of philosophy;
● practice engaging in philosophical thought;
● determine how to gain a more holistic perspective via argumentation; and
● recognize the value of philosophy in thinking about the nature of reality.


 ​
Lesson 1: The Birth of the Mind 
You  could  live  the  entirety  of  your  life  without  once  thinking  about  philosophy or 
even  realizing  that  you  philosophize  every  once  in  a  while.  Still,  there  are many things to gain 
from doing as the many great philosophers did. 

Starting Out 

Where and how does philosophy begin? Why do people start philosophizing? 

​Learn about It! 


How  does  one  begin  to  talk  about  philosophy?  For  a  start,  it’s  important  to  note  that 
philosophy  is  not  unique  to  the  Western  world.  In  fact,  regions  such  as  India,  East  Asia,  and 
the  Middle  East  boast  philosophical traditions which are just as rich and insightful. We have to 
start somewhere though, and A ​ ncient Greece​, at around 6 ​ 00 BCE​, is as a good a place as any. 

Over  the  past  hundred  years  or  so,  mankind  has  steadily  improved  in  its  efforts  to 
survive  and  thrive.  As  man  learned  to  domesticate  certain  types  of  plants  and  animals,  the 
possibility  of  forming  cities  and  settlements  was  realized. Soon, society was organized in such 
a  way  that  specific  members  would  be  responsible  for  farming  and  food  production,  while 
others  would  be  enlisted as soldiers and warriors. Of course, a few took it upon themselves to 
lead  and  govern  all  the  others.  Though  significant,  this  development  might  not  seem  tied  to 
philosophy  at  all,  but  consider  this:  For  the  first  time  ever,  man  has  no  longer  had  to  worry 
about his day to day existence. He didn’t have to stress about hunting or foraging for food. For 
the  very  first  time  in  history,  man  was  free  to  ​think  leisurely  and  ask  so-called  “deep” 
questions  about  the  world  and  his  place  in  it.  Man  started  to  ​wander  about  the  world  he  is 
into, he now had the time to stop for a while and ask questions such as: 
● What are the things of the world made of?
● Where did the world come from?


 ​
● Who am I?
● Is there a God?
● Is there life after death?

This  newfound  time  gave  man  the  opportunity  to  learn  more  about  the  world  and  his 
place  in  it.  In  effect,  man  was  able  to  obtain  knowledge  who  he  was  and  the  nature  of  his 
surroundings.  That  said,  it  is  rightful  to  acknowledge  that  ‘philosophy’  is  derived  from  the 
Greek  words-  philo  (​love​)  and  Sophia  ​(​wisdom​)​.  Literally,  the  word ​philosophy means the ​love 
of/for wisdom​.  

There’s  a  reason  philosophy  has  been  called  ​“The 


Mother  of  Sciences”  and  that’s  because  the  earliest 
philosophers  began  to  study  anything  and  everything. 
True  enough,  back  then,  there  weren’t  really  distinctions 
between  the  different  fields of science as we would know 
them  today.  The  very  first  biologists,  physicians, 
mathematicians,  and  physicists  would  call  themselves 
philosophers,  due  in  large  part  to  the  fact  that  they 
simply loved wisdom and learning. 

While  it  is  true  many  of  man’s  first  questions  can 
now  be  answered  by  other  fields,  people have continued 
to  philosophize  precisely  because  there  are  some 
concerns  that  cannot  be  addressed  by  these  modern  sciences.  In  short,  science—as  we 
understand  it  today—has  more  to  do  with  a  search  for  answers.  Philosophy,  on  the  other 
hand,  places  greater  emphasis  on  ​thinking  about  questions​.  Oftentimes,  in  philosophy,  the 
questions  are  more  important  than  the  answers.  Learning  how  to  ask  the  right  questions  is 
more important than simply blurting out a memorized answer. 

But  the  question  remains: If science has been able to provide answers to some of those 


initial  questions,  why  has  philosophy  survived?  Simply  put,  there  are  certain  things  that 
cannot  be  answered  by  science, and philosophy excels in dealing with ​questions which don’t 
have  ready  and  clear-cut  answers​.  For example, biology will tell us that when we fall in love, 
there  are  specific  chemicals  and  interactions  going  on  inside  our  brains.  But  if  that’s  the 
case—if  something  as  important  as  love  is  simply  a  matter  of  biological  reactions—do  you 
actually  have  a  choice?  Are  you  actually  free  to  decide  who  you  choose  to  love?  If  you’re  not 
free,  then  you  can’t  be  held  accountable  or  responsible  for  your  actions.  After  all,  you  didn’t 

 ​
choose to do them. 

This, among other things, is what philosophy is all about. 

Philosophy  has  grown  and  evolved  throughout  the  past 


2500  or  so  years  and  can  be  roughly  divided  into  three 
branches. 

Metaphysics  (literally,  “what  is  beyond  physics  or 


nature”)  deals  with  the  nature  of  the  world  and  everything  that  exists.  Many  of  the  earliest 
philosophers  concerned  themselves  with  explaining  what  matter  was  made  of—with  finding 
out  what  the  common,  most  basic  quality  everything  had.  ​Thales  (624-546  BCE), who is often 
considered  the  first  Greek  philosopher,  proposed  that  everything  was  made  of  water.  Later 
on,  ​Heraclitus  (535-475  BCE)  claimed  that  everything  was  in  a  state  of  flux  or  perpetual 
movement,  and  that  everything  would  start  and  end  with  fire.  There  are  many  more 
Pre-Socratic  philosophers  (thinkers  who  appeared  before  Socrates)  and  the  questions  with 
which they were concerned are still being tackled to this day. 

Epistemology  is  the  branch  of  philosophy  which  deals  with  knowledge  and  knowing.  In 
studying  knowledge,  the  philosopher  concerns  himself  with  questions  about  truth,  about 
whether  it  is  even  possible  to  know  what  is  true.  For  that  matter,  is  it  possible  to  know  any 
object at all given that one’s senses can be deceptive or faulty? 

Finally,  ​Value  Theory  deals  more  with  how  we  live  and  act  and,  as  the  name  implies,  place 
value  on  certain  things.  When  we  talk  about  ​Ethics​,  for  example,  we’re  interested  in  how  to 
live  and  act  as  a  member  of  a  society,  as  relational  beings.  In  ​Aesthetics​,  beauty  is  the  main 
concern and whether it is possible to actually have a standard of beauty at all. 

All  in  all,  if  there’s  one  thing  to  remember  about  philosophy,  it’s  that  you  don’t  necessarily 
“study  philosophy.”  Rather,  you  ​do  philosophy​.  Success  as  a  student  of  philosophy  is  not 
based on how much you know about a certain topic, but by h ​ ow well you can think​. 


 ​
Check Your Understanding 
Answer the following questions in no more than three (3) sentences. 

1. What made it possible to philosophize and think about life’s “deep” questions?

2. How are philosophical questions different from scientific questions?

3. Which branch(es) of philosophy deal(s) with the study of religion? Why?

Philosophy Applied
Although  we  engage  in  philosophy  every  day,  there  is  value  in  actually  realizing  and 
acknowledging that we’re doing philosophy. 

Take  some  time  to  pause  from  your daily routine. Why do you do the things that you do? Why 


do  you  feel  what  you  feel?  Why  do  you  think  in  the  manner  that  you  do?  Don’t  be  satisfied 
with  the  answer  of  “That’s  just  who  I  am.”  Rather,  look  deeper  into  what  you  value.  In  that 
regard,  why  do  you  value  or  give  importance  to  certain  things  or  ideas  over  others?  Who  or 
what influenced you to do so? 


 ​
Mostly,  allow  yourself  to  be  filled  with  wonder  and  awe  at  the  world  of  which  you  are  a  part. 
Let  your  mind  wander  freely  and  dare  to  ask  questions,  even  and  especially  the  ones  you 
might not have the answers for. 


 ​
Lesson 2: The Mind’s First Steps 

While  it  is  all  well  and  good  to  ​know  about  philosophy,  you  aren’t  really  philosophizing 
yet until you ​engage ​with the ideas and thoughts of previous thinkers and your fellow man. 

Starting Out 

How do I actually engage in philosophy? 

​Learn about It! 

It  was  ​Aristotle  (384-322  BCE)  who  once  said  that  ​man  is  a  rational  animal​.  Though 
many  present-day  philosophers  refute  this  claim,  there  is  a  little  grain  of  truth  in  such  an 
assertion. 

The  simplest  way  of  understanding  this  claim  is  that  man,  armed  with  intelligence  and 
the  capacity  to  think  about  all  sorts  of  ideas,  is  not  a  mere  animal  or  beast.  We  are  different 
from all the rest of creation because we can think rationally. 

However,  you  need  not  look  far  to  realize  that 


sometimes,  man  isn’t  always  rational.  Yes,  we  have  the 
capacity  to  be  rational,  but  that  isn’t  always  the  case. 
When  we  argue  with  a  friend  about  our  favorite  athlete 
or  movie,  it  is  not  unheard  of  to  resort  to  insults, 
shouting,  and  referring to unfair criteria in order to “win.” 
In  these  instances,  we  seem  to  be  very  irrational.  As 
students  of  philosophy,  being  irrational  is  exactly  what 
we want to avoid. But how so? 

10 
 ​
In  essence,  the  philosopher  uses  ​Logic  as  his  toolbox.  He  deals with arguments and all 
sorts  of statements and uses careful rational thought to arrive at the truth. Note that when we 
talk  about  arguments,  we don’t necessarily refer to a battle of wits. Rather, we’re talking about 
statements  in  a discourse or discussion. In effect, to excel as a philosopher, one must sharpen 
his  tools  of  reasoning.  More  importantly,  he  must  keep  in  mind  that  the  goal  of 
argumentation or discourse is not to win but to know the truth. 

In  its  simplest  form,  ​Logic  is  the  use  of  arguments—also  called  ​premises​—correctly. 
The  goal  of  philosophical  discourse,  therefore,  is  to  provide  arguments  logically  and  avoid 
thinking fallaciously. 

Deductive  arguments  are  often  said  to  start  from  the  general  and  end  with  the  specific.  In 
philosophy,  to  argue  deductively  is  to  provide  successive  premises  which  lead  to  certain 
conclusion. That is, if all of your premises are true, your conclusion will be true as well. 

For instance, 

Premise 1:​ All dogs are mammals. 


Premise 2:​ Lassie is a dog. 
Conclusion:​ Therefore, Lassie is a mammal. 

In  the  example  above,  it  is  impossible  for  the  conclusion  to  be  false  if  all  of  the  premises  are 
true.  In  this  case,  we  call  such  a  deductive  argument  as  ​valid​.  Simply  put,  if  the  conclusion 
drawn  from  the  premises  makes  sense,  then  the  argument  can  be  considered  valid.  If  the 
conclusion doesn’t make sense, it can be classified as ​invalid​, as in the example below. 

Premise 1:​ All dogs are mammals. 


Premise 2:​ Dumbo is a mammal. 
Conclusion:​ Dumbo is a dog. 

The  argument  as  a  whole  is  invalid  because the flow of reasoning didn’t necessarily follow the 


flow  of  general  to  specific.  Premise  2  is almost as broad or as general as Premise 1, and so no 
clear conclusion about the nature of Dumbo can be made. 
However,  you  must  remember  that not all valid arguments are necessarily true. Yes, they may 
make sense argumentatively, but you’ll notice that something’s just not right. For instance, 

11 
​ 
Premise 1:​ All birds can fly. 
Premise 2:​ An ostrich is a bird. 
Conclusion:​ An ostrich can fly. 

The  argument  in  itself  is  valid  but  that  doesn’t  make  it  true.  There  is  no  known  record  of  an 
ostrich  ever  taking  flight.  The  error  in  reasoning  stems  from  the  false  premise—specifically, 
that  all  birds  can  fly.  That  said,  one  very  important  thing  to  remember  about  deductive 
arguments:  If  all  of  your  premises  are  true  and  factual  and  the  flow  of  your argumentation is 
valid, then your argument will a ​ lways​ be true. 

Inductive  arguments​,  meanwhile,  are  characterized  more  by  their  predictive  power.  That  is, 
they  don’t  deal  with  certainties  but  with  probabilities  and  likelihood.  Perhaps  it’s  best  to  give 
an example first before explaining: 

Premise 1:​ Most Filipinos have black hair. 


Premise 2:​ Pedro is Filipino. 
Conclusion:​ Pedro has black hair. 

In  the  example  above,  it  is  very  likely  that  Pedro  has  black  hair  based  on  the  premises.  Note 
that  it  is  possible  that  Pedro  has  brown  or  maybe  even  blonde  hair,  and  so  the  conclusion 
doesn’t rule that possibility out. Still, since the conclusion is very likely, this inductive argument 
is  ​strong​. In other words, the “proofs” presented in the premises are strong enough to lead us 
to believe that the conclusion is likely. 

Let’s consider another example: 

Premise 1:​ Most Filipinos have black hair. 


Premise 2:​ Pedro has black hair. 
Conclusion:​ Pedro is Filipino. 

In  contrast  to  the  first  inductive  argument,  this  example  can  be  considered  ​weak  since  the 
likelihood  that  Pedro  is  Filipino  based  solely  on  his  hair  color  is  very  small.  We  know  this 
because  black  hair  is  abundant  and  prevalent  in  the  make-up  of  many  other  nationalities. 
Chinese and Indians alone (more than 2 billion people) are predominantly black-haired. 

Philosophy  is  about  engaging  ideas  and  other individuals in a discourse aimed at knowing the 

12 
 ​
truth.  With  this  in  mind,  knowing  how  to  argue  correctly—whether  deductively  or 
inductively—can only help in your journey for the truth. 

Check Your Understanding 


Determine whether the following arguments are valid or invalid. 

1. Premise 1:​ All men are mortal.


Premise 2: ​Socrates is mortal.
Conclusion:​ Socrates is a man.

2. Premise 1:​ All fish have gills.


Premise 2:​ A shark is a fish.
Conclusion:​ A shark has gills.

Determine whether the following arguments are strong or weak. 

3. Premise 1:​ Grey clouds usually bring heavy rains.


Premise 2: ​Clouds are grey today.
Conclusion:​ It will most likely rain today.

4. Premise 1:​ Mike just moved here from the United States.
Premise 2:​ Mike has blonde hair.
Conclusion:​ Most people from the United States have blonde hair.

Philosophy Applied 
Probably  more  than  anything,  devoting  yourself  to  philosophy  and  philosophizing  will 
lead  to  the  improvement  of  your  ability  to  think,  and  not  just  in  the  broad  sense,  but  how  to 
formulate  your  thoughts  and  ideas.  The  point  of  philosophy  is  never  to  argue  for  the  sake  of 
arguing. Rather, to engage in argumentation is to engage in a communal pursuit of the truth. 

13 
 ​
That  said,  deductive  and  inductive  reasoning  can  be  utilized  in  all  sorts  of  one’s  daily 
life.  From  posting  a  comment  on  social  media  to  providing  supports  in  your  latest  academic 
paper,  thinking  clearly  and  without  fallacy  is  one  of  the  best  ways  to  hone  your  mind  for  the 
rigors of philosophical thought. 

14 
 ​
Lesson 3: Our Minds at Work 

Apart  from  learning  how  to  think  critically, one of the biggest benefits of philosophizing 


is  the  apparent  wisdom  that  comes  with understanding the world in which one lives. Far from 
simply  coasting  from  one  day  to  the  next,  the  philosopher  is  concerned  with  the  very  nature 
of reality and what that means for his earthly life. 

Starting Out 

What is the nature of reality? What do I know to be true? 

​Learn about It! 

Probably  the  most  stirring,  thought-provoking,  and,  to  an  extent, unsettling description 


of the world we live in today was laid out by ​Plato ​(428-348 BCE) in his ​Republic​. 

In  what  is  widely  known  as  the  ​Allegory  of  the  Cave​, Plato paints a picture of man as a prisoner 
inside  a  cave.  He  is  chained  and  unable  to  move,  trapped  as  it  were  with  other  prisoners. 
Behind  them  is  large  fire  and  in  front  of  this  fire  is  a  parade  of objects. The shadows of these 
objects  are  projected  onto  the  wall  in  front  of  the  prisoners.  One  very important detail: these 
prisoners  have  been  chained  inside  the  cave  their  entire 
lives.  They  have  never  seen  the  world  outside  the  cave, 
and  so  all  they  know  to be true and real are the shadows 
displayed on the cave walls. 

This,  Plato  contends,  is  how  man  knows  the  world.  For 
Plato,  there  is  a ​World of Pure Forms above and beyond 
man’s  knowledge.  In  the  allegory,  this  is  represented  by 
the  world  outside  the  cave.  One  prisoner  eventually 
makes  it  out  of  the  cave  and  sees  this  outside  world. 

15 
 ​
Having  known  nothing  but  shadows  and  darkness,  he is blinded by the light outside—just like 
how  we  tend  to  be  disoriented  when we see a sudden bright light in the pitch black night. The 
prisoner  sees  the  true  forms  of  the  shadows  he  saw  inside  the  cave.  He  can’t  believe  it  and 
rushes  to  tell  his  fellow  prisoners  of  what  he  just  saw.  It  is  at  this  point  that  Plato reminds us 
of  the  cruel  truth  of  life.  The  other  prisoners  don’t  believe  him,  and  why  would  they  when 
they’ve  never  experienced  or  known  anything  but  shadows?  So  the  one  prisoner  who 
experienced truth and beauty and reality is left alone with no one to relate to. 

This  allegory  has  stood  the  test  of  time  due  to  the  truth  it  imparts.  On  the  one  hand,  it 
seems  impossible  to  think  of  things  greater  or  “more  real”  than  the  objects  we  can  see  and 
touch  and  feel.  On  the  other  hand,  entertaining  the  possibility  that  what  we  once  believed  to 
be  true  is  actually  false  is  not  such  a  pleasant  activity.  This,  perhaps,  is  what  makes  the 
allegory  so  memorable—because  it’s  been  proven  time  and  again  throughout  history.  Many 
things which were once thought to be true were eventually proved to be false. For example, 

● The belief that the Earth was at the center of the Solar System
● The belief that the Earth was flat
● The  belief  that  sickness  and  demons  could  be  cured  by  drilling  a  hole  into  a  person’s
skull

And if this is the case historically, what more of our current truths could actually turn out to be 
false? 

Check Your Understanding 

Provide more examples of past truths which later turned out to be false. 

1. Past Truth: _______________________________________________


How was it proven to be false?

16 
 ​
2. Past Truth: _______________________________________________
How was it proven to be false?

Provide examples of beliefs you personally believed but later on changed when you grew up. 

3. Past belief: _______________________________________________


What changed your belief?

4. Past belief: _______________________________________________


What changed your belief?

Philosophy Applied 
While  engaging  in  philosophy  can  lead  us  to  a  sense  of  awe  and  joy,  we  mustn’t  forget 
that  the  critical  thinking  and  exchange  of  ideas  involved  in  philosophy  can  also  lead  us  to  be 
disturbed  and  troubled.  If  anything,  it  is  in  these  moments  that  we  learn  more  about 
ourselves. 

Just  as  the  prisoner  in  the  cave,  it  is  possible  for  us  to  go  beyond  our  current 
understanding  of  things  and  gain  greater  insights  into  the  workings  of  the  world.  With  this  in 
mind, how do you think one can get out of our “personal caves” of doubt, bias and disinterest? 

17 
 ​
Be the Philosopher! 

Task:  Find  a  partner  (whether  a  classmate,  a  schoolmate,  or  even  a sibling). Talk about 


your  interests,  your  likes  and  dislikes.  Once  you  find  something  that  you  disagree  with—say, 
for  example,  your  preference  for  favorite  breakfast  food  or  the  best  Marvel  movie—write  a 
persuasive  paragraph  addressed  to  your  partner.  Using  the  principles  of  Logic,  use  valid 
deductive  arguments  and  strong  inductive  arguments  to  persuade  your  partner  to  side  with 
you and acknowledge that your preference is, indeed, the better one. 

18 
​ 
Criteria  Beginning  Developing  Accomplished  Score 

(0-12 points)  (13-16 points)  (17-20 points) 

Content  The ideas are  The presentation  The presentation 


unoriginal, unclear,  expressed good and  expressed a lot of 
and do not  on-point ideas, but  ideas, and 
contribute to the  with only a few  effectively 
topic.  points that  incorporates the 
incorporate the  philosophies, and 
philosophies.  tells multiple 
thoughts and 
concepts that are 
stimulating. 

Organization  The flow of the  The flow of the  The flow of the 
presentation  presentation is  presentation can be 
cannot be  organized, although  understood well and 
understood and  there are some  is very organized. 
needs  points that needed  There is clear and 
improvement. The  clarification.  smooth transition 
ideas are jumping  from one point to 
from one to  another. It is 
another.  sufficiently 
comfortable to be 
understood. 

Conventions  The writer did not  The writer followed  The writer complied 
follow the  some of the  with all the 
instructions, and  instructions but also  instructions 
the task was not  did not adhere to  provided, and the 
well-executed.  the others, but the  task was 
task was still  well-executed. 
well-executed. 

Total Score: 

19 
 ​
​Philosophy & I: Check and Reflect
Mark the appropriate boxes that define your understanding of the lessons. 

I think I need more  I have a minimal  I am confident that I 


Skills  understanding of it.  can do this with ease. 
time and assistance. 

I can define the terms 


and ideas used in the 
lessons. 
I can properly classify 
certain arguments as 
deductive or inductive, 
valid or invalid, strong 
or weak. 
I can point out specific 
moments in history 
and in my life wherein 
previous beliefs have 
been changed and 
improved. 

Wrap Up
● Philosophy,  the  love  of  wisdom, is more concerned with asking the right questions than
searching  for  answers.  In this regard, to engage in philosophy is to sharpen one’s ability
to think.
● There  are  three  general  branches  of  philosophy—namely,  Metaphysics,  Epistemology,
and Value Theory, of which Ethics and Aesthetics are a part.
● Logic  is  the  philosopher’s  “toolbox”  in  the  sense  that  to  do  philosophy is to enter into a
discourse.  The  goal  of  this  discourse  is  to  know  the  truth,  and  this  is  attained  via  a
series of arguments, which can be deductive or inductive.

20 
 ​
● Philosophy  can  also  lead  to  disturbances  in  the  sense  that  it  challenges  individuals  to
think and consider what is beyond their current understanding.

Bibliography
Bloom, Allan. 1991. T​ he Republic of Plato​, 2​nd​ ed. New York, New York: Basic Books. 

Dy Jr., Manuel B. 2001. ​Philosophy of Man, Selected Readings​, 2​nd​ ed. Quezon City, Philippines: 
Goodwill Trading Co. Inc. 

Hurley, Patrick J. 2010. A


​ Concise Introduction to Logic​,​ ​11​th​ ed. Boston, Massachusetts: 
Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 

Nagel, Thomas. 1987. ​What Does It All Mean?: A Very Short Introduction To Philosophy​. New York: 
Oxford University Press, Inc. 

Janicaud, Dominique. 2003. P


​ hilosophy in 30 Days​. London, United Kingdom: Granta 
Publications 

Answers to Check Your Understanding

Lesson 1: ​The Birth of the Mind 


1. Man was free to have leisure time and think about some of life’s “deep” questions
thanks to advancements in farming and food production, and improvements in political
and social organization.
2. Philosophical questions don’t have ready and clear-cut answers. Often as well, in
philosophy, the question is more important than the answer.
3. All three branches, but especially Metaphysics (e.g. the existence and nature of God)
and Value Theory (e.g. how valid is morality if it is based on the principles of one
particular religion)

Lesson 2: ​The Mind’s First Steps 


1. Invalid

21 
 ​
2. Valid
3. Strong
4. Weak

Lesson 3: ​Our Minds at Work 

Answers vary. 

Glossary 

1. Aesthetics  –  A branch of knowledge that deals with the principles of beauty and artistic
taste
2. Allegory  ​–  A  story,  poem,  or  picture  that  can  be  interpreted  to  reveal  a  hidden
meaning, typically of moral or political nature
3. Deductive  Argument  –  An  argument  characterized  by  or  based  on  the  inference  of
particular instances from a general law
4. Epistemology​ – A branch of philosophy that deals with the study of knowledge
5. Ethics ​– A branch of knowledge that deals with moral principles
6. Inductive  Argument  ​–  An  argument  characterized  by  or  based  on  the  inference  of
general laws from particular instances
7. Logic​ – Reasoning conducted under strict rules of correctness and validity
8. Metaphysics​ – A branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality
9. Value  Theory  –  A  branch  of  philosophy  that  deals  with  how  and  why  people  value
things and ideas

22 
 ​

You might also like