1988 2 744 5 50 0.
0162
2030 15 1353
2774 17
Consider Ho MA MB Mc
union man are
Ha Not all
equal
I BETWEEN TREATMENT ESTIMATE OF POPULATION VARIANCE
sum of squares betweentreatment STR
We know that
SSTR
Egnice 2,2 K 3
I 156
131
3142 144
SSTR 6 156 14472 6 142 14472 6 134 14472
6 144 614 6 100
248 6
1488
mean sstr
SETI SIT
since K I 34 2
MSTRE 744
14281
I WITHINTREATMENT ESTIMATE OF POPULATION VARIANCE
SSE
Sum of squares due to error
Sse
ÉCnj 1 s
SSE G D 164 4 6 1 131 2 6 1 110.4
I 406 5
2030
Mean SSE
If get
EEE
III CONDUCTING F Test
Falculated I
Mmgtf 7344 549
at 2 005 for and
dfenumerato 2
dfcdenominator 15 the Faticalave 3.68
Since Fear Fortical we reject Ho
at a oof the meanforthe three treatments
can be said to be unequal
As a result we can that the data has come
conclude
from differentpopulation g the three different treatments
do lead to a change in outcome
1415
160 IS
SST SSTR ISS E
460 300 TSE
Sst 160
Levels of factor k 5
used 7
Units
total 35
pop
For T 5 1 9
For E H K 35 5
2 0.05 F 2.69
i Fob For
Reject Ho
Sos dof Msa F p
Tr 150 2 75 48 0.23228
250 16 15 62
E
400 18
T
7 19
K 3
I 150 TE
900 150 TE
EI 280
0.05
prame
0.2328 C 0 05
Ho
Reject
F 0.05 3.63
Fool For
Ho
Reject
K 3
AT 30
Sos dof MSE F Prak
Tr 4560 2 22809.86 0.008
61
E 6240 27 231.11
10800
t 29
I 29
Faitical 3.35 Feal Faitical
i
Reject Ho
5
E
4007 57.19
n 17 3,2 1 31
SST SSBN SSE t STR
SSE 1800 900 400
500
usedinsteadof foramenace in now
FOR TREATMENT FOR Block
Hot Mi Mz Mz Mg
MA Not all my
population a guy Ha Not allpopmeansare equal
Foal 2.4
Foal 12.6
Faigt
I
[Link] df 7,21
Faitical 303 Feal LFaitical
4 005 Cdf 3,21
Foal Faitical i
nanny
6
Calculatedfigures are written in blue
F
13.27
310
I 7.27
I 5.84
6 5
8 3
FOR TREATMENT
Hot M 42 932Mg Ms Ho D 42 03
Fal 7.27
FM oo If 2,6
I j
Faitical 453
2 005 Cdt 4,6 Y Foal Faitical
RejectHo
SST 280
SSA orSSTRA 26
23
SSBCor SSTRB 175
SS ABCor SSTRAB
Factor A levels i e rows 4
Factor B levels i e columns 3
ie m 3
Replications the given data
ANOVA table for
For SSE
we know
that total variation
sources of
can be divided into
variations screw that
Frat treatment treatment treatment
variation
offactor factorB AxB
A
WiFitreatments error
SST SSTRATSSTRB t
SSE
SSTRAB
SSE 280 26 23 175
4
280 224
56
ANOVATABLI
s te_ Éi s 3 es
4.914
aetorBSSTRRB23E51 2MSTRBETH 23 11.5 FB f
[Link] 1154
12.46
Mth Eth 75 2917
FAB MEET 21374
BStrap1755111
energy
56 KIM 124ms 84 2 34
SST280
4 3 135
need to test for the
we
following hypothesis
Factor
Ho Ma Maz MASE MAG
Ha Not all population meals are
equal
Ék Be MB2 MB3
Not all population
nears
HA
are equal
Istae
populationequal
Not all
Ha areas
i FAcale 3 705
4 914
FBcalc
12.46
FABcalc
At 2 0.05 we have the
critical values
following
for factor A 3 01
3124
Foo
Fritical
i 3 7057 3.01
since y Fortical
We Reject Ho
Factor B
for
Foritical Fo05424
3 40
4 91473 40
i Foale S Foritical
we Reject Ho
For Interaction Effect
124
Foritical Foo 2 51
12.5 72 51
12 I 7 2 51
i Talc Fortical
we
Reject Ho
In summary we can
say that
means for FactorA differ significant at
Factor B means for factorB differ 2 0 05
ZaetosA X weak interaction effect
FactorB
