EIA Screening Report for Fonthill Development
EIA Screening Report for Fonthill Development
FOR A
PREPARED BY
ON BEHALF OF
March 2022
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3
PURPOSE OF THIS STATEMENT ............................................................................................................... 3
EIA SCREENING AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 3
EIA Thresholds .................................................................................................................................... 4
Sub EIA Threshold Projects requiring an EIA ...................................................................................... 5
EIA SCREENING STATEMENT ................................................................................................................... 7
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................. 7
A DESCRIPTION OF THE ASPECT OF THE ENVIRONMENT LIKELY TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................................................. 9
Population & Human Health............................................................................................................... 9
Biodiversity ......................................................................................................................................... 9
Lands and Soils.................................................................................................................................... 9
Water .................................................................................................................................................. 9
Air, Noise and Climate ...................................................................................................................... 10
Landscape & Visual ........................................................................................................................... 10
Material Assets ................................................................................................................................. 10
Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage ............................................................................ 11
Vulnerability of the project to risks of major accidents and/ or disasters. ...................................... 11
Inter-relationship between the above factors ................................................................................. 11
A DESCRIPTION OF ANY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS TO THE EXTENT OF THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON
SUCH EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE ENVIRONMENT ....................................... 12
COMPILATION OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION TAKING SCHEDULE 7 CRITERIA, AS APPROPRIATE, INTO
ACCOUNT .............................................................................................................................................. 13
APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT ................................................................................ 17
CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 17
Appendix A – Archaeology Report from 2005 Application ................................................................... 18
2
INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Statement accompanies a Proposed Part VIII
Development at Fonthill Road, County Dublin prepared by South Dublin County Council.
The Environmental Screening Report has been prepared to assess the potential impacts on the
environment of the proposed development at the subject site. The full details of the scheme are as
follows:
The statement is prepared with direct input from the design team who include by McCrossan O’Rourke
Manning Architects; McGill Planning Limited; Whitehill Environmental; Kavanagh Burke Consulting
Engineers; to ensure that the possible effect on the environment has been examined through the
process of an EIAR Screening process (detailed below) and the most appropriate form of development
is delivered at this site.
3
• OPR Practice Note PN02, Environmental Impact Assessment Screening (2021)
Using the above documents, it has been possible carry out a desktop EIA Screening using the best
available guidance while operating within the applicable legislation. It is noted that Directive
2014/52/EU has been transposed into Irish Legislation through the Planning and Development
(Amended) Act and Planning and Development Regulations 2018.
The methodology employed in this screening exercise had regard to the Guidelines for Planning
Authorities and An Bord Pleanála on carrying out Environmental Impact Assessment published in
August 2018 by the DoHPLG, together with the criteria set out in Schedule 7 and the requirements of
Schedule 7A, both of the Planning and Development Regulations 2018.
EIA Thresholds
Schedule 5 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2018 (as amended) sets the thresholds for
which if a project exceeds these limits, it then must be the subject of an Environmental Impact
Assessment. Part 2 of Schedule 5 (10)(b)(i) identifies developments of more than 500 dwelling units
and (iii) identifies urban development which would involve an area of greater than 2 hectares in the
case of a business district, 10 hectares in the case of other parts of a built-up area and 20 hectares
elsewhere.
The number of housing units proposed is 7 and well below the 500-unit threshold, while the site area
at 0.36 ha is also well below the 10ha threshold for “urban development” on lands comprising “other
parts of a built-up area” other than a business district. The adjoining area is predominantly a
residential area to the west of the Fonthill Road.
4
Sub EIA Threshold Projects requiring an EIA
Directive (EIA 2014/52/EU) requires the applicant to provide certain information to allow the Planning
Authority to carry out proper screening to determine if an Environmental Impact Assessment Report
is required. Schedule 7A of the Planning and Development Regulations outlines the information to be
provided by the applicant for the purposes of screening sub-threshold development for Environmental
Impact Assessment as set out below:
The information as set out above shall take into account the criteria set out in Schedule 7 which
provides a list of criteria for determining whether development listed in part 2 of schedule 5 should
be subject to an environmental impact assessment. These can be grouped under broad headings and
topics as set out below:
5
• Nature reserves and parks;
• Areas classified or protected under national legislation;
• Natura 2000 areas designated by member States pursuant to Directive
92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/etc;
• Areas in which there has already been a failure to meet the environmental
quality standards, laid down in Union legislation and relevant to the project,
or in which it is considered that there is such a failure;
• Densely populated areas;
• Landscapes and sites of historical, cultural or archaeological significance.
6
EIA SCREENING STATEMENT
The following sections provide the information as required by Schedule 7A for the purposes of
screening sub-threshold development for Environment Impact Assessment.
The site is bounded to the south by temporary traveller accommodation and lands subject to a
permitted SHD scheme (ABP 305857-19) that is currently under construction, to the west by the
Ballydowd Special School, to the east by the Fonthill Road (R113), N4 Slip Road and to the north by
lands in the ownership of St. Loman’s Hospital..
7
There are four bus stops within a 10minute walk of the subject site. These are served by new Dublin
Bus routes C1, C3, C3, C4, C5, C6, P29, L51, L53, 51D, and two old routes 52 and 40. The new bus routes
are part of the Bus Connects Phase 2 and were launched in November 2021. The C2 operates every 6-
10 minutes from 6.30am-8am heading from Adamstown to Sandymount and every 5-10 minutes from
4pm-6pm heading from Sandymount to Adamstown.
Vehicular and pedestrian access to the site is from Fonthill road east of the subject site.
The site is open green space with vegetation around the perimeters. The northern boundary
comprises a row of trees separating the subject site from land under ownership of St Loman’s Hospital,
which are being retained and the western boundary comprises of metal fencing which separates the
site from the Ballydowd Special Care Unit. There is temporary traveller accommodation to the
immediate south of the site.
There are a broad range of uses surrounding the subject site. The area east of the site is Liffey Valley
Town Centre which comprises of retail and recreational services, to the north and south by
educational and health buildings, further south is Fonthill Retail Park and to the west is largely
categorised by residential developments.
The site is free from protected structures, and it is not located within a Conservation Area or an
Architectural Conservation Area. The site is not designated for nature conservation and there are no
watercourses on or adjacent to the site. There are eight Natura 2000 sites within 15km of the subject
site.
8
A DESCRIPTION OF THE ASPECT OF THE ENVIRONMENT LIKELY TO BE
SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
This section provides examines the possible effects on the environment under the topics prescribed
by Directive 2014/52/EU. This approach provides a comprehensive description of the aspects likely to
be affected by the proposed development that have not been identified.
During the construction phase, there may be possible short-term nuisances to human beings from
noise and dust during construction. Once standard mitigation measures are implemented, in
accordance with an agreed Construction Management Plan, it is not anticipated that the construction
works would result in significant environmental impacts for the local population and human health.
There are no operational impacts associated with this residential development that would be likely to
cause significant effects in terms of population and human health.
Biodiversity
Biodiversity is not likely to be significantly impact by the proposed development during the
construction phase or operational phase. There are no habitats of biodiversity value on the site and
the habitats are dominated by grassy areas and artificial surfaces. There are currently no habitats
within the site suitable for any protected mammal species.
Furthermore, an AA Screening assessment has been carried out and it has found: “Having regard to
the location, nature and scale of the proposed development, it is considered that there is no potential
for significant effects either from the proposed development on its own or in combination with other
plans and projects”. Please refer to the Statement of Screening for Appropriate Assessment prepared
by Whitehill Environmental for further detail.
The site has minimal existing vegetation. The proposal includes high quality landscaping, planting
and SUDS measures to be incorporated into the development to ease water runoff.
Water
During the construction phase there is a minor potential for contamination of surface waterways,
resulting in reduced water quality. However, this is considered unlikely given the distance between
the subject site and any significant waterways in the wider catchment. Standard construction
mitigation measures will be employed to further reduce the risk of pollution and contamination of
waterways.
9
The site does not adjoin any significant waterways and it is considered that there are no anticipated
significant effects on the existing water environment arising from the proposed development during
the operational phase.
The proposed water supply will be via a connection to the existing Local Authority watermain. The
proposed development will also connect into the existing surface water drainage and foul water
drainage system.
There is a potential for temporary localised noise and vibration impacts during the construction phase.
These impacts will be mitigated against in line with an agreed construction management plan and the
potential impact on human health is considered to be slight, negative, and temporary. The potential
impact on noise and vibration during the operational phase will arise from a minor increase in traffic
levels, but the impact is expected to be not significant.
There will be slight, temporary negative landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase.
However, these impacts will be slight, and short term.
The operational phase will result in a positive visual impact with the completion of a small scale
residential development, adjacent to the residential scheme currently under construction to the
south.
Material Assets
The land on which the site is situated is a material asset. It has been zoned for development through
the appropriate process, and as such, the use of this material asset in a manner compatible with the
zoning designation, is entirely appropriate. Once constructed, the operational phase will provide an
important material asset for the area in terms of residential units.
In terms of existing utilities, the proposed development will require access to the local water supply,
wastewater, public roads infrastructure, electricity supply, telecommunications, municipal waste
management and gas, all of which are readily available. The additional demand on these services can
be facilitated and will not lead to any negative environmental impacts. Equally the construction of the
development will not negatively impact on existing services.
10
In terms of traffic, there will be temporary and limited localised impacts on traffic associated with the
construction phase of the development. Once operational, the proposed development will generate
very limited trips, therefore the existing road and junction links to access the proposed development
site can operate satisfactorily in accommodating the levels and types of traffic likely to be generated
by the proposed residential units.
An archaeological assessment, carried out as part of St. Edmunds residential development permission
in 2005 (SDCC Reg. Ref.: SD05A/0090), noted the following:
“there are no recorded archaeological sites in the area of the proposed development and a
recent field inspection revealed nothing of an architectural or archaeological nature within its
boundaries. The nearest sites are located to the east of the site and consist of a holy well
(700m).
The proposed development site appears from cartographic evidence to have remained
undeveloped agricultural land until the mid-twentieth century and on early historic maps as
agricultural land. No structures are depicted on any of these maps.”
The survey area for this archaeological assessment included the subject site. The assessment is
included in Appendix A of this document.
11
A DESCRIPTION OF ANY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS TO THE EXTENT OF THE
INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON SUCH EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
ON THE ENVIRONMENT
This includes information available on the environment including:
(a) the expected residues and emissions and the production of waste, where relevant, and
(b) the use of natural resources, in particular soil, land, water and biodiversity.
It is expected that there will be some normal residues/emissions during the construction stage
associated with the development works proposed as part of this amendment application which
include ground preparation works, development of site infrastructure, construction of buildings and
hardstanding areas and landscaping of the site including open soft landscaped areas.
Standard mitigation measures will be employed and monitored. These will be set out in an agreed
Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan and Operational Waste & Recycling Management
Plan As such residues and emissions are not considered likely to have potential to cause significant
effects on the environment.
There will be some waste materials produced in the construction of the proposed scheme which will
be disposed of using licensed waste disposal facilities and contractors. As is standard practice the scale
of the waste production in conjunction with the use of licensed waste disposal facilities and
contractors will not cause concern for likely significant effects on the environment.
Standard practice and measures will be used to maximise the quantity of waste recycled by providing
sufficient waste recycling infrastructure, waste reduction initiatives and waste collection and waste
management information to the residents of the development.
There will be no large scale use of natural resources. The main use of natural resources will be land.
The subject lands are zoned for residential use.
Other resources used will be construction materials which will be typical raw materials used in
construction of residential and employment developments. The scale and quantity of the materials
used will not cause concern in relation to significant effects on the environment.
Similarly, the construction or operation of the scheme will not use such a quantity of water to cause
concern in relation to significant effects on the environment. The use of natural resources in relation
to the proposed development is not likely to cause significant effects on the environment.
12
COMPILATION OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION TAKING SCHEDULE 7 CRITERIA,
AS APPROPRIATE, INTO ACCOUNT
The compilation of the above information and assessing the development against the Schedule 7
criteria:
Characteristics of Proposed Development
The size of the proposed development. The site is 0.36ha and the development is for 7
residential units under Part VIII of the Planning
Process. The development is sub-threshold for EIA.
The culmination of other proposed development. The size of the development is considered to be small
in comparison to existing and proposed residential
development in the surrounding built-up suburban
area.
The nature of any associated demolition works. No demolition works associated with this proposed
development.
The use of natural resources, in particular land, soil, This site is mainly an open space with the temporary
water and biodiversity. traveller residential accommodation and the SHD
development site to the south. The site is 0.36 ha and
primarily consists of grassy areas with vegetation
remaining around the perimeters. Quality
landscaping, planting and SuDS measures will be
incorporated into the development to ease water
runoff. There are currently no suitable habitats
within the site for any protected mammal species and
minimal flora apart from the perimeter trees which
are being retained in the majority.
13
Pollution and nuisances. The construction phase will create short term
negative impacts particularly in terms of dust and
noise. These negative impacts will be mitigated
against by standard mitigation measures that will be
set out in the contractor’s construction management
plan. Construction works will be restricted to certain
times of the day to avoid nuisance.
The relative abundance, availability, quality and The proposed development will not significantly
regenerative capacity of natural resources (including impact the relative abundance, availability, quality
soil, land, water and biodiversity) in the area and its and regenerative capacity of natural resources. SuDs
underground. will be incorporated into the development to ensure
a properly controlled water regime.
The absorption capacity of the natural environment, The site itself is not located within a wetland, river
paying particular attention to the following areas: mouth, coastal zone, marine environment, mountain,
(i) wetlands, riparian areas, river mouths; forest, nature reserve, park, or protected site.
(ii) coastal zones and the marine environment;
(iii) mountain and forest areas;
(iv) nature reserves and parks; The Statement of Screening for Appropriate
(v) areas classified or protected under legislation, Assessment completed by Whitehill Environmental
including Natura 2000 areas designated pursuant to and submitted with this application confirms that the
the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive and; “proposed development, individually or in
(vi) areas in which there has already been a failure to combination with other plans or projects, will not
meet the environmental quality standards laid down have a significant effect on any European sites” and
in legislation of the European Union and relevant to therefore “the proposed project does not need to
the project, or in which it is considered that there is proceed to Stage II of the Appropriate Assessment
such a failure; Process, i.e., a Natura Impact Statement (NIS)”.
(vii) densely populated areas;
(viii) landscapes and sites of historical, cultural or
archaeological significance.
14
Types and characteristics of potential impacts
The magnitude and spatial extent of the impact (for
example, geographical area and size of the It is expected that the proposed development will not
population likely to be affected). have any environmental impact beyond the site and
immediate vicinity.
The nature of the impact. The potential likely and significant impacts arising
from the development will be typically those
associated with a small sized residential development
on a small site of 0.36 ha.
15
There are no other planned or recent developments
in the immediate vicinity which would be the subject
of EIA requirement.
The possibility of effectively reducing the impact. Appropriate mitigations measures will be undertaken
in order to ameliorate effects on the environment
arising from the proposed development. Any
mitigations measures to manage noise, dust and/or
pollution during the construction phase will be based
on standard best practice, policies and guidance, and
will be agreed with South Dublin County Council.
16
APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT
A Statement of Screening for Appropriate Assessment has been carried out for this site. It has found
that this development occurs on a site that is of low ecological sensitivity of the subject lands.
The conclusion of the report finds that “It is of the opinion of the author that an AA of the proposed
development is not required as it can be excluded, on the basis of objective information provided in
this report, that the proposed development, individually or in combination with other plans or projects,
will not have a significant effect on any European sites. Therefore, this proposed project does not need
to proceed to Stage II of the Appropriate Assessment Process, i.e., a Natura Impact Statement (NIS).”
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, it is respectfully submitted that an EIAR is not required for the proposed development,
which is an amendment to a permitted development, as the proposal remains below the thresholds
of Schedule 5 of the Planning and Development regulations. The AA Screening Report also outlines
that the proposal is unlikely to have effects on the Natura 2000 Network, either alone or in
combination with other plans; the development will be connected to public services such as water and
foul systems; standard construction practices can be employed to mitigate any risk of noise, dust or
pollution; and no identified impact in this screening exercise either individually or cumulatively will
have significant impacts on the environment.
In conclusion, it is considered that the proposed development will not have any significant impacts on
the environment. All recommended mitigation measures and standard practices will be employed
throughout the construction and operation phase of the development to ensure that the proposed
development will not create any significant impacts on the quality of the surrounding environment.
17
APPENDIX A – ARCHAEOLOGY REPORT FROM 2005 APPLICATION
18