Rane Group: History and Operations Overview
Rane Group: History and Operations Overview
CHAPTER-1
Rane initially found as a distributor of automobile and subsequent parts in the year
1929. The Rane Groups started manufacturing from 1959 with several strategic Technical
Alliances. Rane Groups have access to state-of-the-art technology. In seven years the
company was incorporated as Public Limited Company. In the year 1959, Rane was
diversified in manufacturing and established plant for IC Engine Valves. Within a year Rane
established a facility to make Tie Rod ends and Friction materials, Manual Steering Gears
and Brake linings in the subsequent years. In 1995 Rane Institute for Employee development
was established. In the millennium year of 2000, Total Quality Management was launched
under the guidance of “Union of Japanese Scientist and Engineers” which later went to be the
root cause for several ground breaking achievements.
The production facilities in Mysore caters to the tractor and commercial vehicle
segment; the Pondicherry plant to the passenger car segment; the plant in Chennai caters to
the light commercial vehicle, heavy commercial vehicle and utility vehicle segment; the
Kancheepuram plant to the export market and the manufacturing facility in Pantnagar
(Uttarakahnd) supplies gears exclusively to Tata motors limited. Rane (Madras) limited was
incorporated on the march 31, 2004as a public limited company with the name Rane Holding
Limited.
Rane holding limited made additional investment in the company, and thus the
company became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Rane holding limited, with effect from
March 26, 2007.
2
Provide superior products and services to our customers and maintain market
leadership.
Evolve as an institution that serves the best interests of all stakeholders.
Pursue excellence through total quality management.
Ensure the highest standards of ethics and integrity in all our actions
3
High Pressure
Steering Columns
Aluminum Die
Electric Steering
Casting Products
Rane NSK Steering Rane Die cast
Systems Limited Limited
Over the years Rane (Madras) Limited has grown to be the largest in the group, both
in terms of size and turnover, with five manufacturing plants in
CHAPERT-2
RANE (MADRAS) LIMITED
Rane (Madras) Limited (RML), Puducherry is one of the Rane Group of companies;
RML Puducherry was started in 1996 in technical collaboration with M/s TRW, UK. The
factory has a total land area of 73008 Sq. meters and builds up area of 4025 Sq. meters. The
plant started with supply of Manual Rack & Pinion to Maruti Suzuki, small 10% share of
business. Since then it has grown significantly. The plant currently manufactures manual
Rack & Pinion Steering gear, steering suspension and linkage products for passenger car
application.
2.2 VISION
To be the leader in the domestic Steering business
To establish global presence.
Provide superior products and services to our customers and maintain market
leadership
Evolve as an institution that serves the best interests of all stake holders
Pursue excellence through total quality management
Ensure the highest standards of ethics and integrity in all out actions
Major Customers include Maruti Suzuki, Tata Motors, Fiat and Ford, Ashok Leyland;
Eicher, Hero Honda, Renault, Toyota, TVS Motors Company, Mahindra, Yamaha, Swaraj
Mazda, Hyundai, Fiat, and Honda. The major overseas customers are CNH UK, DEUTZ
Germany, Electro motive USA, HATZ Germany, YAMAHA Asia, and TRW Europe &
USA.
6
The plant entered into exports in 2003 by supplying steering gears for M/s SAIPA - a
joint venture between Kia Motors, Korea and the Iranian Government. the Exports
Destination are USA, Mexico, Germany, UK, Italy, Bulgaria, Jordon, Kenya, Taiwan, Iran,
Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia and Japan. In 2005, the plant started
supplying to M/s John Deere US, for their farm utility vehicle.
The company had been facing space constraints in view of its growing as exports. It
will also expand its product range by including hydrostatic steering gear for farm tractors.
Rack & pinion steering gear for electro power steering. Some more Rane Group Units is
expanding their operation. Rane NSK Steering System limited, which manufactures energy
absorbing steering columns, is setting up a production facility at Uttaranchal. Similarly Rane
Brake Linings Limited and Rane Engine Values Limited are also contemplating building a
new plant in Chennai.
7
TECHNOLOGY
Rane group brings to its clientele, the best of technology & Expertise through
strategic technical partnership with leaders from around the – State-of-the-art Technology.
TRW Automotive US LLC, Power steering system, Ball Joint Seat belt system and
engine valves.
NSK Japan, Energy absorbing steering columns and Manual RCB SG.
2.6 FACILITIES
Rane Group partners with a wide spectrum of Auto majors to provide the concept to
product solution. It is made possible by manufacturing and testing facilities at each group of
companies.
FACILITIES
CHAPTER-3
8
PRACTICES IN RML
3.1 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
These elements are considered so essential to TQM that many organizations define
them, in some format, as a set of core values and principles on which the organization
is to operate.
11
CHAPTER-4
ACHIEVEMENTS
4.1 THE DEMING PRIZE
The Deming Prize is one of the highest awards on TQM (Total Quality Management)
in the world. It was established in 1951 in commemoration of the late Dr. William Edwards
Deming who contributed to Japan’s proliferation of statistical quality control ager the World
War II.
The Deming Prize is given for organizations such as companies, institutes, divisions
of organizations, operational business units and headquarters offices whose quality of
products is the pinnacle of their respective cadre.
The first of the RANE group to win this prestigious award was Rane Brake Lining
Limited in the year 2003. The same award was presented to Rane Engine Valve limited and
Rane TRW Steering Systems Limited in the year 2005 for culminating their product quality.
In the year 2007, this distinguished award was bestowed on Rane (Madras) Limited for its
significant development of quality of the products delivered to its customers.
13
The Deming Grand Prize was created to commemorate the first International
Conference on Quality Control (ICQC), held in October 1969 in Tokyo, and to maintain and
upgrade the spirit of the conference long into the future. With the purpose of further
developing the world of quality control, the Deming Grand Prize was established with a fund
from surplus conference revenues.
An organization may apply for the Deming Grand Prize three years or more
(including the award year) after it has received the Deming Prize or the Quality Control
Award for Operations Business Units. When it is recognized that an applicant's
implementation of TQM has improved substantially beyond the level at the time it won the
Deming Prize, the organization is awarded the Deming Grand Prize.
Rane (Madras) Limited was named the winner of this award for its audacious
developments in quality in the year 2012. This signifies that the products produced from
Rane (Madras) Limited are of such quality that the customer takes no pain to verify them for
standards.
14
CHAPTER-5
Steering System: The steering gear mechanism is used for changing the direction of two or
more of the wheel axles with reference to chassis. The condition for correct steering is that all
the four wheels must turn about the same instantaneous centre of rotation. It prevents the
excess wear of tyres.
The steering system works with the suspension system to provide directional control
with a comfortable amount of steering effort. It must do this while allowing for the necessary
movement in the vehicle’s suspension system. Some parts serve both systems. The steering
system consists of a steering gear, steering linkage, a steering column and a steering wheel.
Two types of steering systems are widely used in today’s vehicles: rack-and-pinion steering
and “conventional” steering.
Rack-and-pinion Steering
Conventional Steering
Conventional steering transmits the circular motion from the steering wheel
through a gear that moves an arm through a back-and-forth arc, acting on a set
of linkages to steer the wheels. It is also referred to as “recirculating ball” or
“worm gear” steering, for the type of gear it uses, or parallelogram, trapezium
or simply linkage steering, for the shape formed by the shape formed by the
linkage set. This type of system can be found on most rear wheel drive cars,
light trucks and full size vans.
For smooth performance of the system, the steering system of any vehicle should
fulfil the following requirements:
1. It should multiply the turning efforts applied on the steering wheel by the
driver.
2. It should be to a certain degree irreversible so that the shocks of the raod
surface encountered by the wheels are not transmitted to the driver’s hands.
3. The mechanism should have self-rightening effect so that when the driver
releases the steering wheel after negotiating the turn, the wheel should try to
achieve straight ahead position.
The steering gear is a device for converting the rotary motion of the steering wheel
into straight line motion of the linkage with a mechanical advantage.
The steering gears are enclosed in a box, called the steering gear boxes. There are
many different designs of steering gearbox, some of them are as follows:
Worm and Sector Steering Gear Box
Worm and Roller Steering Gear Box
Cam and Double Lever Steering Gear
Worm and Ball bearing Nut steering Gear
Cam and Roller Steering Gear
Cam and Peg Steering Gear
Recirculating Ball Steering Gear
Rack and Pinion Steering Gear
In the Rack and Pinion steering gear, a pinion is mounted on the end of the steering
shaft. It engages with a rack which has ball joints at each end to allow for the rise and fall of
the wheels. The rods connect the ball joints to the stub-axles. The rotary movement of the
steering wheel turns the pinion which moves the rack sideways. The movement of the rack is
converted to the wheels.
17
CHAPTER-6
PLANT-3 (PUDUCHERRY)
The Rane (Madras) Limited consists of two main plants:
1. The Steering Gear Products (SGP) Plant
2. The Steering & Suspension Linkage products (SSLP) Plant.
The Steering and Suspension and linkage products plants produces Inner Ball joints (IBJ),
OBJ (Outer ball joints), housing to hold them together and also perform assembly of the
above mentioned parts.
The SGP plant produces the rack and pinion necessary for the rack and pinion
assembly used in the steering mechanism. The housing to hold them together is also produced
in this plant. The assembly of the all the parts is performed in the assembly section in this
plant.
18
CHAPTER – 7
7. Rack Cell in Rane Madras Limited
The Steering Gear Products (SGP) plant includes both the pinion cell and
Rack Cell. Four active rack lines perform this job of producing rack of various types based on
the necessity of the customer. The two major types of racks are the male and the female rack.
The racks produced here are MUL, ALTO, YR9, D40, etc.
The processes involved in the production of a rack is listed below:
19
7.2 Parting
The outer diameter or the surface of the parted work piece is grinded so as to obtain a
smooth surface and also to have the advantages of easy machinability and safety
during handling.
21
a) Facing is the process of removing metal from the end of the work piece to
produce a flat surface. Most often, the work piece is cylindrical. When a lathe
cutting tool removes metal it applies considerable tangential force to the work
piece.
b) To safely perform facing operation, the end of the work piece must be
positioned close to the jaws of the chuck. The work piece should not extend
more that 2-3 times its diameter from the chuck jaws unless a steady rest is
used to support the free end.
c) Turning is by far the most commonly used operation in a lathe. In turning, the
work held in the spindle is rotated while the tool is fed past the work piece in a
direction parallel to the axis of rotation. The surface thus generated is a
cylindrical surface.
22
Broaching is a machining process that uses a toothed tool, called a broach, to remove
material. This is the bottleneck operation of this flow process. Broaching operations
are used for processing of various internal and external surfaces. This is also
recommended for processing of round and irregular shaped holes which may have flat
or contoured surfaces. Some of the cavities and holes are directly machined by
broaching operations, the example is spline hole. Sometimes execution of broaching
operation requires more than one pairs. The teeth of a gear or spline may be broached
altogether or one or a few at a time. Normal indexing operation (see milling machine
operation for details) is done for cutting teeth by broaching. After completion of
broaching of one tooth indexing action is performed and another tooth is broached
and this continues till all the teeth are [Link] is widely used for faster
finishing operations in metal working so it is a fit case for mass production. Merits
and demerits of broaching operations are described below.
24
(b) Production run time in case of broaching is very large as a broach has very
long life. The whole processing load is shared by so many teeth.
(c) Due to faster operation and longer tool life, it is relatively cheaper.
(d) Both rough cutting as well as finished cutting can be completed in a single
pairs of tool.
(g) It is also capable to process internal and external surface including intricate
shaped cavities.
(h) Broaching makes the effective use of cutting fluids as it facilitates the flow
of cutting fluid into the cuts.
In addition to the above merits the operation of broaching has some demerits, which
are described below:
(a) Broach is a multipoint cutting tool having multi cutting edges. Preparation
of cutting edges is a costly affair. Its initial cost is quite high.
(b) There is a limitation of size of work piece in case of broaching. Very large
sized work pieces cannot be subjected to broaching operation.
7.7 Degreasing
The date marking is an important process as it determines the date, time and
batch the particular job is produced.
In Rane(madras) Limited a specific date is used to mention the various
information as mentioned below:
Month
Name of the
Company
R 11 K 15 B D
H Batch
Year of Production Code
Date
Shift
7.11 Tempering
7.12 Straightening
Due to the process of the tempering, there are chances that the job might have
undergone tensile forces and would have curved or lost straightness.
In order to bring the job back to its original straight stature straightening is
performed.
The straightness is verified manually using dial gauges and if any deformity is
noticed the job is straightened.
31
Crack detection is performed for the detection of minute cracks that might
have formed due to tempering and the other tensile operations that have been
performed.
Here crack detection is performed following non-destructive testing method.
The most reliable method of non-destructive testing would be by using
radiography. The radiation used in radiography testing is a higher energy
(shorter wavelength) version of the electromagnetic waves that we can see as
visible light. The radiation can come from an X-ray generator or a radio-active
source.
The part is placed between the radiation source and a piece of film. The part
will stop some of the radiation. Thicker and denser area will stop more of the
radiation. The film darkness will vary with the amount of radiation reaching
the film through the test object.
32
CHAPTER – 8
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
1. Pareto analysis is a formal technique where many possible courses of action are
competing for attention.
2. It is a creative way of looking at causes of problems because it helps stimulate
thinking and organize thoughts.
3. This technique helps to identify the top portion of causes that need to be addressed to
resolve majority of the problems.
4. Once predominant causes are identified, then tools like the Ishikawa diagram or
Fish-bone analysis can be used to identify the root causes of the problems.
5. It is common to refer Pareto as “80/20” rule, under the assumption that, in all
situations, 20% of cause determine 80% of problems.
6. The application of Pareto analysis in risk management allows management to focus
on those risks that have the most impact on the project.
By Pareto analysis chart it is found that first 3 defects are contributing for 80%
of total defects.
Based on this concept we had taken Rack cell rejection for further studying.
Rack cell problem data book is made on the basis of rejection quantity in PPM.
Then ranking is made based on
1. Customer severity
2. Interruption in production
3. Defect detection
[Link] PROBLEM REJECTION PPM CUSTOMER SEVERITY RANKING IN INTERRUPTION DEFECT DETECTION TOTAL RANK
As per ranking ‘A’ type category as ‘Rack flat thread rejection’ is high priority
problem and also its contributing high rejection as 1208 PPM. So Flat Thread
Rejection is taken as a QC Project.
36
If the thread formation is OK on the Rack there will be proper steering control. If flat
thread occurs in rack. Rack and IBJ connecting end breaks which leads the car to travel in
varied path apart from original path ultimately leads to Accident.
37
Improper flat thread result to steering out of control and it may leads to fatal accident
High rejection – 1208 PPM
Rework of rack at final assembly is non value added activity.
Operator fatigue is high
Low operator morale
Scraping of bought of parts at the time of rework at assembly leads to increase in cost
of quality
DATE SHIFT MACHINE MODEL JOB DIA PRODUCED QTY REJ QTY TYPE OF REJECTION
• Whenever the job got rejected, we will check the spindle and job run out.
Since all the three jaws does not meet with the specification they should be rebored.
Separate jaw setting for different diameter requires more space for spare maintenance.
Quick setting / Adjustment training for operators requires more time for establishing.
So team will decide to taking job run out issue for further study.
41
CHAPTER-9
ANALYSIS OF ISSUE
Nominal group technique is usually done with the help of facilitator. It involves 5 stages
namely
Introduction and explanation
Silent generation of ideas
Sharing ideas
Group discussion
Voting and sharing
Based on this analysis method possible causes of the problem Flat Thread Rejection
have been found and these have to be applied in Cause and Effect Diagram.
We have Eliminate some possible causes By Experience/ Gemba.
43
Man
Machine
Method
Material
Based on these probable causes for the defects identified from Brainstorming Analysis are
classified according to the categories in the diagram and then validate the causes which is
responsible for the defects.
CATEGORY METHOD
Rack overhanging distance checked with various trials and found the same flat thread
rejection. Hence it is Insignificant.
Visually checked jaw teeth location. Mismatching of jaws will lead to uneven clamping .but
found all 3 jaws located with even distance and jaws properly engaged with spindle teeth.
Hence it is Insignificant.
46
Checked incoming material run out and found 0.03 mm against the spec of 0.05 mm (Pre
straightening operation done at parting cell) . Hence it is Insignificant.
9.7 Job contact area with jaw
47
EN8C Bar material checked and found 54 HRA against the spec. of 50 to 54 HRA .Also
chemical parameters has ensured against of spec and found no difference. Hence it is
Insignificant.
We checked across diameter on the job and found ± 5 micron against the spec of
tolerance ± 10 micron . Hence it is Insignificant.
9.9 CATEGORY MACHINE
Checked chuck lubrication points and jaw play and found no abnormalities-
Every 6 month chuck PM activity done by tool room. Ensured PM records for last 6 months
and found ok .Hence it is Insignificant.
Thread tool holder spec M14 X 1.5 pitch, thread depth 16 mm checked and found ok. Tool
life monitoring system checked and found ok. The tool tightening and edges found no
abnormalities. Hence it is Insignificant.
Spec of spindle speed is 1800 – 2000 rpm. Ensured with digital tachometer reading is
2000 rpm against of spec. Hence it is Insignificant.
Checked and found program standardization done for all models. After standardization we
are using only 8 offset for all customers. Hence it is Insignificant.
We checked concentricity of between the inner bore dia and outer dia. Spec is - 0.02 mm
and found 0.01 mm against of spec . Hence it is Insignificant.
Back lash variation checked and found 0 micron against component tolerance of ± 20
micron and machine tolerance 8 micron. Checked backlash program with 10 trials and found
no variation. Hence it is Insignificant.
Checked spindle run out by dial gauge. spec is – 0.02 mm and found 0.01 mm against of
the spec . Hence it is Insignificant.
9.99 Turret indexing position
53
Checked turret X axis and Y axis position. Found 0.02 mm against the spec of 0.03 mm.
Hence it is Insignificant.
Program defined as 10 passes for M14 X 1.5 pitch threading operation. We checked
and found the same. Hence it is Insignificant.
Boring insert program
54
Boring holder Insert and clamping screw combination tool set up verified and found ok.
Hence it is Insignificant.
Jaws damages will lead to uneven clamping and job run out. So flat thread occurred
because of job run out. Hence it is Significant.
Problem identified but root cause of the problem still not identified. So team has
decided to further study in this issue.
CHAPTER-10
55
We conduct a trial with various operators for loading and unloading. During loading, the
job hitting on the jaws edges. So this is major root cause for jaws damage.
RESULT
During loading the job hitting of jaws repeatedly .So jaws got damaged, so while
running jobs getting run out, so flat thread rejection occurred. Hence it is
Significant.
Jaw re boring frequency maintained by tool room But jaw bulge is our monitoring
point.
We didn’t have preventive maintenance for jaw edge damages.
During loading the job hitting of jaws repeatedly .So jaws got damaged.
So while running jobs getting run out, so flat thread rejection occurred. Hence it is
Significant.
So we have identify the root causes of rack flat thread rejection by validation through
data.
ROOT CAUSE: Job run out due to Jaws edge damage while loading the job.
3. WHY: Soft jaws not withstand the job loading force given by operator.
MACHINE SCOPE:
Based on the study collet type chuck idea is considered for further analysis.
Team has decided that one intermediate flange to provide between machine part and
collet. The intermediate flange have designed for connecting of machine part with collet. As
per design the team have made the flange by internal sources.
Additionally we have added one intermediate flange for collet mounting. So draw bar
length also increased for intermediate flange width. Draw bar length increased from 500 mm
to 550 mm Due to intermediate flange extension. Successfully we implemented the collet
type clamping method instead of chuck type clamping method.
61
CHECKING RESULT
CONFIRMATORY TRIALS
After implementation of collet type clamping instead of chuck type clamping trials are
made for flat thread rejection. We found no rack flat thread rejection. Rack flat thread
rejection eliminated from 1208 PPM to 0.
63
After side effects verification found rack flat thread rejection eliminated. But rack overall
length rejection obtained frequently.
PROJECT REVISIT
Why length under size rejection came after collet type clamping modification?
Trial taken for length under size frequent rejection.
64
10.8 FINDINGS
Draw bar pull the jaws during clamping so job cannot comes out while clamping.
Draw bar push the collet during clamping – So job slightly comes out while clamping,
so that job u/s rejection comes.
Trial contacted with various operator and various models. In that trial, Length u/s
rejection not occurred at particular operators to ran the machine.
Job slightly comes out during collet type clamping. Some operators always given
external support manually at the time of clamping.
If to give external support properly during clamping the rejection will be eliminated.
65
COUNTER MEASURE: To ensure job not move along with draw bar while clamping.
IDEAS GENERATION: Auto support butting stopper to be provided for rack clamping.
MACHINE SCOPE:
We having 8 station in turret.
4 station only using for current operation.
We can utilize the turret station for auto butting stopper
VERIFICATION OF IDEA
PQCDSM
P – production
Q – quality
C – cost
D – delivery
S – safety
M – morale
67
CONCLUSION
Quick movement
To Easley setting to machine
Low cost
Long life
Simple design
Based on these characteristics simple design is made.
CONFIRMATORY TRIALS
SIDE EFFECTS
Cycle time increased from 63 sec to 69 sec (6 sec for auto front butting).
Setting adjustment time reduced from 31 min to 14 min.
Productivity increased from 276 no’s to 282 no’s.
68
• Length under size rejection due to collet clamping modification were eliminated.
For each shift setup has been changed 2 times. So the implementation of butting
stopper have reduced the setup time from 31 min to 14 min which will increases the output
per shift.
69
Before
Total Available time = 7.33 * 3600 * 0.8 = 21110.4 secs = 351.84 mins
Where 0.8 is 80 % based on OEE since no one can work 100%.
Total cycle time in secs = 63.
Available time – setting time = 21110.4 – 3720 = 17390.4 secs.
Output per shift = 276 No’s.
After
Total Available time = 7.33 * 3600 * 0.8 = 21110.4 secs. = 351.84 mins.
Total cycle time in secs = 69.
Available time – setting time = 21110.4 – 1680 = 19430.4 secs.
Output per shift = 282 No’s.
70
STANDARDIZATION
5W – 1H CHART
BOOK OF LEARNING
The book of learning is a reference tool that has stored data from the inception of the
industry to the latest possible update in the process flow of various products produced
in the industry.
It is very important tool in the process of learning as it can be used for reference
purpose in case any new idea has been conceived.
It contain information about the previously achieved projects and improvements
which could act a perennial source of innovations and ideas.
For future reference, the data obtained from the various studies and observations have
been updated in the book of learning.
71
CONCLUSION
So we have eliminated rack flat rejection from 1208 PPM to 0 PPM and rack length under
size rejection from 648 PPM to 0 PPM.
PARETO ANALYSIS
CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM
BRAINSTORMING ANALYSIS
WHY WHY ANALYSIS
HISTOGRAM
BAR CHART
PIE CHART
STRATIFICATION
72
HORIZONTAL DEPLOYMENT
WHAT – Collet type clamping method, Auto front support butt stopper.
WHERE – All 6 Jobber Machines.
WHEN – March’15.
WHO – Project Team & QCC Team.
HOW – By Designing as per dimensions.