Supplier
selection
C1 C2 C3
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
A1 A2 A3
ANP method
1. The priority vectors
Network structure 2. The super matrix
Pair comparisons The ranking of
3. The cluster matrix alternatives
matrix 4. The weighted super matrix
5. The limit super matrix
6. The utility index
C1 C2 C3 C4
1 429 0.600 5 4
2 649 0.700 4 5
3 459 0.400 1 1
4 419 0.500 2 2
MAUT method
The decision matrix 1. The normalized decision The ranking of
Weight of attributes matrix alternatives
2. The marginal utility score
3. The final utility score
C1 C2 C3 C4
1 3 100 10 7
2 2.500 80 8 5
3 1.800 50 20 11
4 2.200 70 12 9
C1 C2 C3 C4
1 0.319 0.167 0.140 0.344
2 0.191 0.333 0.279 0.219
3 0.229 0.267 0.349 0.156
4 0.319 0.167 0.140 0.344
C1 C2 C3 C4
1 0 0.498 0.598 0
2 0.401 0 0.201 0.363
3 0.282 0.198 0 0.546
4 0 0.498 0.599 0
C1 C2 C3 C4
-0.683 0.498 0.598 0
0.401 -1.194 0.201 0.363
0.282 0.198 -1.398 0.546
0 0.498 0.599 -0.909
IDOCRIW method
1. The normalized decision
matrix
2. The degree of entropy
3. The entropy weight (W)
4. The square matrix The ranking of
The decision matrix
5. The relative impact loss attributes
matrix
6. The weight system matrix
7. The criterion impact loss
weight (q)
8. The aggregate weight ( )
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
1 5 3 4 2 3
2 2 4 1 4 2
3 5 2 4 3 3
TODIM method
1. The normalized decision
The decision matrix matrix The ranking of
Weight of attributes 2. The relative weight alternatives
3. The dominance degree
4. The overall dominance
degree
