EP A RSP
Production Part Approval Process
(PPAP)PPAP is to demonstrate supplier’s understanding of:
Le cose a faa VAs ota st, 0 deed oUt
= pursed Ga agr Sea css ea eek
ie Se S beta L@sti te hia pS aCe) Production
SOO NR) cscs er meee
eat ithe ede ae ee gi ii Ses om Dice
rua rhea ee uunscey yes pp 0 Ma possi
Cae = Ue eS hy Sartore ied rts
Sie siapile| panies Re rm renee
Perret! Ba DY cS CA 1) ed ene Soe
Acsuabis Phas Seco mE co
Se Bete Certain
a Characteristics | | Significant an ae
Siuciurostitud STE ete
Vea Cee Ten pei ae ar |
E30) Gs Zia Ohae ns
4 Material aman WA D3 ct
leper oe ee oa,
Model Year (MY) bls fore Characteristics roan Verification
eer Tere no) Wests te Syren
Pass Through ene not
Characteristics Pena seusdApplication
nS Dae aed
Ci ded Veal 1001-0 (elem ole | malol a [Taal Crem (om
lage. Ee oe
Sam N Mac amceye)(-(0 0 oy-U RICE [0 aes eee
y All new vehicle programs and "running changes" for vehicles
ColWT ec UaT QYAIaM ecole Ute: oTA I Goi eit ep oe. G es ie i o-a 2)
y Any change in supplier operating pattern (i.e. new shift)
(4 copia Sane aed)
y Any additional, modified or reconfigured production tooling,
equipment or work streams
C8 cae be Ve eens ed)
v Revised customer DPV (Daily Production Volume) exceeding
AY-Uelit=Xe RS] 9) \lt=Lmrer-T er (ell VA(=\/=)] MGe=i es MPtBIDContent
aes
Cinta Lore ee ea)
CR regia Oa ieiac a eua ai ibi ee
+ Ford special requirements to PPAP 18 elements.
See Lchmt 0s ee ea Gite Ate S| Ee
+ VPP usage
Ce idee Ot eatenDiez aaa REL OL caeg
PHASED PPAP PROCESSWhat is the Phased PPAP?
4-4 #2Phased PPAP?
+ Phased PPAP is Ford’ s approach to PPAP process management
atl Rd asa Ee Oma fees
+ Introduced to improve upon launch performance
ib ea
ai OSes en
Gama 0LOLIKcooM- 10] 9) 9 AML Ca COM ANMTOLUSSULC]
* Manufacturing capability (iif 77)
+ Product quality (7* Jat)
+ And production capacity (7 fiz)
5 felielm CN es: Merc en aba UD)Phased PPAP vs the old PPAP
iM aed ees
wwe
a PP ia=0)
+ Phased PPAP organizes the process into four phases
Sierra noe CCC)
+ Phase 1: Quality Verification
+ Phase 2: Production Verification
+ Phase 3: Capacity VerificationSupplier Phased PPAP Process Map
Re ace Neds 8
ie
Ete rae ayy er)
a Se Te tC eT Ui ery smn UtLy
Ue eee acl ee ee Ce ete eee)
Sec isak Ten ee eee) ferries
Emenee Harada ase Quality Verification for all
oe ie alae pete
Panera fede are eer)
Pea niscesti a tal ey Soo aoe
Canes aaas Pac sa eee nn a cad
eis ersten
arene eae
Peeve
rege
Scioto
CINPhase 0: Run-At-Rate G#i444Er*)
iment
‘tenon
oa
‘Copyright © 2000-2008 Ford Motor Company. Al rights teserved.Phase 1 Prerequisites (Phase 1fJckAt)
= In order to begin Phase 1, the following are required:
= SoitPhase 1, BABI PARE:
Successful completion of Run-at-Rate (Phase 0) for at least one work
stream
Het Bb — RAPER OD TE eT
Capacity Analysis Report completed for at least one Job1-intended
production work stream
YB Ab — RAE PER MTN TEP BEST OT
Tier “X” successful completion of Phase 1
ar hi 7am Phase 1 PPAP.
‘Copyright © 2000-2008 Ford Motor Company. Al rights reserved.Continue Production Part
Approval Process (PPAP)
using parts trom Phase 0
+ Appearance criteria #13}
+ Sample parts [#14]
+ Master samples [#15]
+ Customer-specitic requirements [#17]
«As defined by PPAP.
Important note: for supptors with only Return to
‘one production stream, completion of Phase 0 for
Phase 1.4 20ccur atthe same time. | | corrective action
ais Slee pay bBo EDWhat is required to get Phase 1 PSW approval?
Hamas) iseadee
Phase 0
PPAP Elements (Before R@R)
Design Records (Released)
Engineering Change Documents
Phase 182
Continue Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
[#9] Dimensional measurements
#10) MeteriauPetormance tests
‘Customer Engineering Approval
#11) Statistical process nackege
Process FMEA
[#12] Cualitied Laboratory Documentation
[215] Appearance criteria
#14) Sample parts
Contral Plans
Measurement System Analysis
‘Capacty Analysis
Report
[#15] Master samples
[#17] Customer-specifc requirements (other)
16. Checking Aids
Specific Requrements
- All AIM issues must be closed with €D.
Packaging Approval (FAPI121)
= Sub-suppller readiness
+ Supplement -
CRT Agreement
PPAP Package
1
Phase 182 PSWInput Requirements (Phase 26 ci7RA LE)
= Phase 2 requires the following (Phase2ji ZLib AE) :
— All Job 1 intended production work streams have successfully
completed Run-at-Rate (SrA4e"2kab mse 7 sae)
— Capacity Analysis Reports completed for all Job 1 intended
production work streams (/)r4i4e "2B a Te Me Pe IED
— Tier ‘X’ successful completion of Phase 2 (4> fii 7énkPhase 2
PPAP).
Paget -Dale Te dae ae
Sonoomannes >
+t 2000 2004 Ford Motor Company. Al aghts reserved.Phase 2: Production Verification (4
(Phase 0_been
‘conducted and
‘Quay Vertications
(Phase 1) boon
Satisted for ALL
steams?
subnet
‘important note: Phase 2 and Phase 3
‘Copyright © 2000-2004 Ford Motor Company. Al rights reserved.Phase 3: Capacity Verification
Phase
Warartii8)
‘scamacty
‘soaie
epon
cure and pan i -
cere acon ae
I Database
Phase and dant
ce SS ~
‘Copyright © 2000-2004 Ford Motor Company. Al rights reserved.Ford Special Requirements to PPAP 18
Ta)
pete mma: asides Ais1. Design Record
Bebe
+ The design must be released and authorized by Ford D&R.
CaeE sop ie aoae ad eM De eae eee Oe AW ats) Pac
+ Where the design record is in electronic format, the organization shall
produce a hard copy (e.g., GD&T drawing) to identify measurements taken.
Came aam ees C7 BCE: Sing SHEE) yea meee EG: B)
(fae AP 6 A et On oe Was I ae Ace EA
DR Tas etal akes
+ Engineering change level properly indicates the latest design change.
Cen ah ee Oe omee ce vias peat ee
+ For FSS, if the parts are identified as black box, the design record should at
least specifies the interface and performance requirements. (e.g. Vehicle
Assembly Position).
Peed ea 0A Pei SOP sree NE ane ay mee as ca. GUNG a eae
ieee2. Engineering Change Documents
Be eae
+ SREA signed by CFT.
GNA Dae ean
Cin) 15 toe OLe ie. 100
See Ras oO la tcy
BLoerai isa)
Ha DAGINZSUbON\a RCo lieth cia aad eo
uA SOc oy SUL Le AALS E Eh Lite a
WERS = World Engineering Release System3. Customer Engineering Approval
Ed aig
+ The organization shall obtain documented Ford Product Development
engineering approval of DV (Design Verification) and PV (Production
Validation) tests of the initial sample parts.
Ma Dieu gioesa rol PsA a Ome tata
+ The organization shall conduct the PV testing on parts/products which were
fedede (Ueto = Lamar) Mv Se Oe uae A aC)
+ Where appropriate, Ford Engineering records initial sample part approval on
the ESER/ESO,
iby ileal Spa esMh cise ee So] ol pea o ON Daa pa
+ WERS Alert for Interim-Approval.
Ure te tue SA eA Sea4. DFMEA
ae Seen Ly
+ When developing FMEA, the requirements of Ford FMEA handbook (special
characteristic definition) shall be met.
tera Unt Eee Rat alla seepage aN
+ For parts with YC/CC, DFMEAs must be approved in writting by Ford D&R
engineer.
eae
De naLe
fe ea (07/0 One Ee eraecas Iba asec Dt
ae ea SEL AL
+ Ford reserves the right to review and tle all organization-developed
Py aa Coad hee Muciau aL amb wa NaS NDE eg
+ Over patent concerns, sometimes, supplier does not wanna share DFMEA,
we could review it at the supplier site or have the supplier bring them to our
Colo SOG Ieee aU Ne5. Process Flow Diagram
Weiies
ict F222 ill Mapping the Manufacturing Process.
Cae
* Organize the team
- HET
Sao Wacol eP elt)
ON pcs meee Ue ON cee) 33
Identify sources of variation in each process
ea ol
eee eee)
a lepec ed besa iM Sly)
Detainee kate)5. Process Flow Diagram
Weiies
Ce) aay
Op No.
Deals
ecetal
Wee
Baie
eeriad
peer aeul
(ire)
rea
omic
7 RARE
Part Characteristic
PUR
ire
Celera csde
BU gl | =P
General Procedure to develop PFMEA: #jiji3!| xt #2 FMEA HN
res reetee ns
Ca Seca i ceeeta es aaa
Deane Rees
naan
: 2
HEED Ia
Ste alee mie CeltE
Oe asd
lorena
genede
BU gl | =P
eicn Ie Sa aE to develop PFMEA: 4ij ii! xt FEFMEA £4) — Sic tnt He (22)
al peer ee eas gion
POV OC Rukus ied
Die agar d
Pee uae cl tc
ie esd
SU CR URC
8 Ib a
RUE e a acute tae
ie Se Une
Pa Meu Moloedde
BU gl | =P
Process FEMA Output is): FEMA ‘fii:
a Seca eich
Cee irate ced Mele iitcel
Sis yal Tee BR ee | ee eae as dd
Pera Rate Mun acs oe ey et
i are ea cba
+ How to control these thingsde
BU gl | =P
Cae a Moca areca gee aC MC RT a Se =
using the CRT approach.
VE seal al =a
is SE Aa tL
Sabo ere acer ae
Seco a rc Uneem a aS Ca eh de a eRe neh EU Wasco
rea aes eae ate cet PLL VOE ia
Seca eee Mae nun Ue a= Wu nates N ry
Crore Un Ct ty NSS 7 cc reece se
Seman a Rue Tease
Deiter ee ecela StNiieed erees tat
+ PFMEA is living document. (8D, SREA...) PFMEA%! 4s! S877. Control Plan
Eesti)
PUM EC Owe (psi eaap ai pee =i
+ Documenting the logical order of processes, start to finish
DA a eee ee
Bee arc eecis ici faeces Cue cry
Pn Atl iea cot ate ee oa
Beano ag
(Bipipriig wae epee cIC Eee
Sa ear ke uo amt
Cae A Bk, BA TAB
+ What to do, if all failed7. Control Plan
Eesti)
* CC/SC list is properly cascaded in to CP.
aE SiS St a/c cacdivi- cea)
Seon cluneM umn uae
SAS A aE Hl PU BSP
+ The Reaction Plan should be evaluated for effectiveness and use.
aa (eO eas a cal ose ca
+ Lists all process parameters and part characteristics that require specific quality
Peer econ
Set ae eOM ne gia i sibel Gis baal F(a pic
CRSP) 910) SM Si O00 Soa md BDSM Gi)
Seek ota ee
ziti] Bbrab [e et ae)7. Control Plan
Et lai
Se ere ne
+ Government Regulations
Spee
+ Fiold Actions
SM
Sete gece
Potential Critical Characteristics and
Significant Characteristics Identified
cae aU!
Pee Cie ORE EUR ee-Uled
peered Sluis)
—
v
v
o
v
u8. Measurement System Analysis
CU em
+ All gauges (both general or dedicated) in Control Plan.
Dae ae DESEO De LC eae TT eRe ee Pade er aiy
Boe eee
+ MSA 3.0 based. 48FMSA3.0fiR4.
+ Associated % tolerance and % study variation.
fee Meteo On eceete
+ To variable gages, the parts used for the Gauge R&R study must be within
Design Record specifications.
Sane ees oO SNe aaa acum aap Ree
+ The acceptance criteria for Gauge R&R as a percent of TOLERANCE is less
than 10%. If %tolerance is over 10% customer approval is needed. The
Gauge is unacceptable if % tolerance is over 30%. NDC more than 5.
Cie OMIM -lalele f o-Uclec-re 71M IAI C= \o Mn Neo a eetPe Uselare mately
IE aay
Dimensional Measurements to compare the actual part with the drawing
(bubble prints). Default are 3 parts measured (5 pcs preferred).
Gee mad es dE ea
If production parts will be produced from more than one cavity, mold, tool,
die, pattern or production process, a dimensional evaluation on one part
from each should be completed.
Be ee Ie ie bo eee cle as ceed
Sioa asst
sea oe ai im
Make one of the parts measured as "Master Sample “
oe a ede10. Material/Performance Test Results
DUE UREA LR a-ae Si UES
+ Where Ford specifies that materials are to be purchased from an approved supplier.
Ei aiever alan haa ua us
baie Sa oes
o fo De ee Oa
CBE Tag tem ae Bree a
+ AILPV test requirements are clearly identified in the DVP&R. (PVP&R)
PAV Guo
PaCS ten eM eho Taare eae
fuse PE eae
Pee Cae reat a Stee UCR MU | aceueted to Uy
(fully calibrated and certified),
Senate ace NR aL zt DeSMP itt cole tel elo
Cp pe etm
+ MSA should be conducted before Ppk study.
eu Uwe cal peal DAG hase amNY ISTAY
+ Ppk is required for Initial Process Study, SCs and CCs must meet at
minimum 1,67 Ppk.
ES gee) Pel ee ACY ALE
a
Cie oleMo RY: Ute oKel- lt ae ORO
+ If Ppk < 1.67, Error Proofing or 100% Inspection is required.
UE NA eed Oe PAE eee | a ee iVCpk or Ppk?
Equation Definition
Process capability for two-sided Process performance for tvo-
specification limits; does not take into specification limits; does not take
(USL -LSL)6o J aecount where the process is centered ( into account where the process is
cp tered (i.e, what the process
(ie., what the process average (X)
is),
Process performance based on the
USL-X Process capability based on the upper
—— ea en upper specification
specification limit
30
Procese performance based on the
=LSL__ J Process capability based on the lower [elaine
cpl
vl 30 specification limit
Cpl
Process perf
specification limits taking into
where the process is
Process eapability for two-sided
specification limits taking into account|
where the process is centered.
Minimum of
| Cpu, Cpl12. Qualified Lab Documentation
fae ane
The qualified laboratory (internal or external) shall have a laboratory scope
and documentation to show it is qualified to conducted the inspection and
testing for PPAP.
Bie DAZ i
$e FEY eB FB)
HEA ATE AC fF
The external laboratory shall be in compliance with the latest ISO/IEC 17025
(or national equivalent).
ed eS aiew re 110) Om NAO) DEL
SUSI HE FI ALBESR13. Appearance Approval Report
PDR Rii aa
+ All parts/products having appearance criteria shall be reviewed and
approved by the appropriate Ford activity (Design Quality).
paca am es ale Ne Ses Sel ed a
dime Me eae eG OO
+ Appearance approval includes, but is not limited to: overall appearance,
surface quality, color, texture, and gloss.
See yeaa ece a.) Veet eM a 2B eh
+ Visual "match-to-master" is the specified requirement for AAR sign-off.
Numeric evaluations should only be used for on-going quality control after
visually acceptable parts/products are attained.
SUNS Yogic Lz Es eam ve (Rene
Dea aR ea au ew yao bai SBR
+ AAR plan and Pre-AAR.
ee) We cs14. Sample Production parts
id
+ Customer defines the quantity.
Ce Seb Se mE ATEN eae
+ Sample Parts are needed for the parts functioning in the Vehicle or
Letey Ua te LAAN
Sie ie aie, cece eo ec WI ee Laas
+ Photos as evidence is acceptable.
CRG atc seam (cose15. Master Sample
Dai
+ Master sample which is retained in the supplier’ s site for reference. Master
sample has the same life as PPAP package.
Ream ee eee eee en eam i eee Lh
+ Supplier shall retain a master sample from each position of a multiple cavity
die, mold, tool or partern, or production process unless otherwise sepcified by
the customer.
. eR TR.
a ieee Se
See ices elaine
+ Dimensional Result is required form Master Sample
ee ia die ace oa16. Checking Aids
Live iE ee
+ Gauge strategy and drawing approved by customer.
See ie Le Cas
+ The gauges are to the latest design level.
az Ree ara oes
+ MSA study to checking fixtures is required.
Dereon cece a. LS .vn IhSWART Olu ms) relies Ce amr ney eee
Bre eel WN) ene male sing:
+ Expendable Package VS. Returnable Dunnage.
nen Gia e a Ome eg
Se eH
- FoE&FAP: FORM 1121 (via FSBC)
Sea e Gn een MPR AMO ps8) |B gS) 310 Las a)
- NA: FORM 150E
ci tc eel
+ Trial shipment that simulates the production logistics process. (Water
Shipment Trial for exporting suppliers)
See UE Sab OLE ep iS L UP Me Ug ce oD Ca:
na Saal17. Customer Specific Requirements
Bx er-yey-Wot NANA Va ii (orl (Ce) Opel)
+ Measure the ability of a supplier to meet Ford Motor Company’ s Capacity
Planning Volume (CPV) with quality parts, on time.
eM eee calla) Peat ae fh
+ Capacity verification to each work station to identify the bottleneck process
F PAL BET LAR AR L FF
* CPV information should be ibade Lome 1a
See SNM Ee tam oa alenok17. Customer Specific Requirements
- Supplement-K & IMDS
Pa Go iS Ses Geto
+ Supp.K is used to demonstrate the linkage between the Drawing - FMEAs -
Control Plans - Operator Instruction Sheets.
Nba name Ese) al V7 saat =P etc AE Ue see
+ All material need to comply to requirement of WSS-M99P9999-A1.
Cie bea UE Se seie el ae LA e DaanVPP Usage
Nd) de seize)are T awn di aed
tie or
COMA] od soe A a1 eo =a Cad Cel [