0% found this document useful (0 votes)
312 views5 pages

Power Sharing in Modern Democracies

Uploaded by

ranjit.jhaa81
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
312 views5 pages

Power Sharing in Modern Democracies

Uploaded by

ranjit.jhaa81
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CLASS - 10th

Class 10 Chapter
Civics - 11:(Power
– Chapter Sharing) - Civics
Power Sharing Social Science

1. What are the different forms of power sharing in modern democracies? Give an example
of each of these.

Answer

The different forms of power sharing in modern democracies are:

 Horizontal Division of Power


It is the sharing of power among the different organs of government, for example,
power sharing by the executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary. In this type of
power sharing arrangement, different organs of government, placed at the same
level, exercised different powers. Such a separation ensures that none of the organs
can exercise unlimited power, thereby putting a check on each other.
 Vertical Division of Power
It is a system of power sharing among governments at different levels. For example,
a general government for the entire country and governments at provincial or
regional levels. In India, we refer to it as the Central Government, State
Governments, Municipality, Gram Panchayat etc. The Constitution lays down the
powers of different levels of government.
 Division of Power among different Social Groups
Power can also be shared among different groups which differ socially like different
religious and linguistic groups. ‘Community Government’ in Belgium is a good
example of this type of power sharing. The system of reserved constituencies in India
is another example. Such an arrangement is used to give minority communities a fair
share in power, who otherwise would feel alienated from the government.
 Division of Power among Political Parties, Pressure Groups and Movements
In contemporary democracies such a division takes the form of competition among
different parties, which in turn ensures that power does not remain in one hand and
is shared among different political parties representing different ideologies and
social groups.

2. State one prudential reason and one moral reason for power sharing with an example
from the Indian context.

Answer

 Prudential Reason: Power sharing helps in reducing the conflict between various
social groups. Hence, power sharing is necessary for maintaining social harmony and
peace. In India, seats are reserved for the weaker sections of society. Example :
reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. This allows the
weaker sections also to participate in the running of the Government.
 Moral Reason: It upholds the spirit of democracy. In a truly democratic setup, the
citizens too have a stake in governance. In India, the citizens can come together to
debate and criticise the policies and decisions of the government. This in turn puts
pressure on the government to rethink its policies and reconsider its decisions.

Printed from [Link]. Score more in your Exams - Start learning from Best Tutors on Vedantu.
Book your free trial today - Call us at +91 92433 43344
Class 10 Civics – Chapter 1: Power Sharing Social Science

3. After reading this chapter, three students drew different conclusions. Which of these do
you agree with and why? Give your reasons in about 50 words.
Thomman – Power sharing is necessary only in societies which have religious, linguistic or
ethnic divisions.
Mathayi – Power sharing is suitable only for big countries that have regional divisons.
Ouseph – Every society needs some form of power sharing even if it is small or does not
have social divisions.

Answer

Ouseph’s statement is the most logical, and thus, should be agreed on. Every society needs
some form of power sharing even if it is small or does not have social divisions. A
democratic society is one where its members or citizens through participation acquire a
stake in the system. Power sharing not only prevents conflict between various groups in the
society but it also generates a sense of belongingness among them to the society. Power
sharing helps to maintain a balance of power among various institutions and also keep a
check on how it is exercised. Irrespective of the size of a country or the type of a society,
people will be more satisfied where they have a say in the functioning and decision making
processes of the system.

4. The Mayor of Mrchtem, a town near Brussels in Belgium, has defended a ban on speaking
French in the town’s schools. He said that a ban would help all non-Dutch speakers integrate
in this Flemish town. Do you think that this measure is in keeping with the spirit of Belgium’s
power sharing arrangements? Give your reasons in about 50 words.

Answer

No, This measure is not in keeping with Belgium’s power sharing arrangements. The
arrangements seek to maintain peace between the French and Dutch-speaking
communities. By banning French, the mayor will cause civil unrest. Both the languages
should be made acceptable in the town’s schools. This bilingual education system will be a
better way to integrate the people of the town.

5. Read the following passage and pick out any one of the prudential reasons for power
sharing offered in this.
“We need to give more power to the panchayats to realise the dream of Mahatma Gandhi
and the hopes of the makers of our Constitution. Panchayati Raj establishes true democracy.
It restores power to the only place where power belongs in a democracy – in the hands of
the people. Given power to panchayats is also a way to reduce corruption and increase
administrative efficiency. When people participate in the planning and implementation of
developmental schemes, they would naturally exercise greater control over these schemes.
This would eliminate the corrupt middlemen. Thus, Panchayati Raj will strengthen the
foundations of our democracy.”

Printed from [Link]. Score more in your Exams - Start learning from Best Tutors on Vedantu.
Book your free trial today - Call us at +91 92433 43344
Class 10 Civics – Chapter 1: Power Sharing Social Science

Answer

The prudential reason for power sharing offered in this passage is giving power to
panchayats is also a way to reduce corruption and increase administrative efficiency.

6. Different arguments are usually put forth in favour of and against power sharing. Identify
those which are in favour of power sharing and select the answer using the codes given
below? Power sharing:
A. reduces conflict among different communities
B. decreases the possibility of arbitrariness
C. delays decision making process
D. accommodates diversities
E. increases instability and divisiveness
F. promotes people’s participation in government
G. undermines the unity of a country

(a) A B D F

(b) A C E F

(c) A B D G

(d) B C D G

Answer

(a) A B D F

7. Consider the following statements about power sharing arrangements in Belgium and Sri
Lanka.
A. In Belgium, the Dutch-speaking majority people tried to impose their domination on the
minority French-speaking community.
B. In Sri Lanka, the policies of the government sought to ensure the dominance of the
Sinhala-speaking majority.
C. The Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power sharing to protect
their culture, language and equality of opportunity in education and jobs.
D. The transformation of Belgium from unitary government to a federal one prevented a
possible division of the country on linguistic lines.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) A, B, C and D
(b) A, B and D
(c) C and D
(d) B, C and D

Printed from [Link]. Score more in your Exams - Start learning from Best Tutors on Vedantu.
Book your free trial today - Call us at +91 92433 43344
Class 10 Civics – Chapter 1: Power Sharing Social Science

Answer

(d) B, C and D

8. Match list I (forms of power sharing) with List II (forms of government) and select the
correct answer using the codes given below in the lists:

List I List II

1. Power shared among different organs of government Α. Community government

2. Power shared among governments at different levels Β. Separation of powers

3. Power shared by different social groups C. Coalition government

4. Power shared by two or more political parties D. Federal government

1 2 3 4

(a) D A B C

(b) B C D A

(c) B D A C

(d) C D A B

Answer

1 2 3 4

(c) B D A C

9. Consider the following two statements on power sharing and select the answer using the
codes given below:
A. Power sharing is good for democracy.
B. It helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups.
Which of these statements are true and false?
(a) A is true but B is false

(b) Both A and B are true

(c) Both A and B are false

Printed from [Link]. Score more in your Exams - Start learning from Best Tutors on Vedantu.
Book your free trial today - Call us at +91 92433 43344
Class 10 Civics – Chapter 1: Power Sharing Social Science

(d) A is false but B is true

Answer

(b) Both A and B are true

Download Others Chapter Pdf From : CBSE Class 10th Study Material

Printed from [Link]. Score more in your Exams - Start learning from Best Tutors on Vedantu.
Book your free trial today - Call us at +91 92433 43344

Common questions

Powered by AI

Power sharing prevents conflicts by ensuring all social groups are represented, reducing feelings of marginalization. For example, India’s reserved constituencies for disadvantaged sections ensure diverse societal representation. Similarly, Belgium’s community governments support linguistic balance, showcasing inclusivity that mitigates ethnic tensions .

Power sharing supports democratic principles both prudentially and morally by ensuring peace and upholding democracy. Prudentially, it reduces social conflicts by accommodating diverse groups, seen in India's reservation for weaker sections allowing inclusive governance. Morally, it supports the democratic ethos by enabling citizen participation in governance, fostering accountability and responsiveness of government actions, as people can debate and influence policies .

Modern democracies employ several types of power sharing to prevent the concentration of power including: Horizontal Division of Power, where power is distributed among different branches of government (executive, legislature, judiciary) to ensure checks and balances; Vertical Division of Power, as seen in federal systems where power is allocated across different levels of government (central, state/provincial, local); Division of Power among Social Groups, ensuring representation of minority communities to give them a share in decision-making, such as 'community government' in Belgium; and Division among Political Parties and Pressure Groups, encouraging competition and ensuring diverse representation .

The evaluation of the three statements about power sharing reveals that Ouseph’s perspective is the most comprehensive and logical. The need for power sharing extends beyond large or socially diverse societies to all democratic societies, ensuring stakeholders feel included and reducing potential conflicts, thereby strengthening democratic governance irrespective of a country's size or diversity .

Power sharing is beneficial for maintaining peace because it helps reduce conflicts by accommodating the diverse interests of different social and linguistic groups. For instance, Belgium’s community government system helps different language groups share power, preventing ethnic strife. Similarly, in India, reservations for scheduled castes and tribes help include disadvantaged groups in governance, promoting social harmony .

Belgium’s power sharing model prevented linguistic conflict by allowing equal power distribution among its communities. In contrast, Sri Lanka’s policies favored the Sinhala-speaking majority, marginalizing Tamils, leading to demands for federal power sharing to maintain cultural and educational equality. Belgium avoided division through federalism, while Sri Lanka faced ethnic tensions due to dominance policies .

Panchayati Raj is supported prudentially for reducing corruption and enhancing administrative efficiency. By empowering local governance, transparency increases and citizens can directly control development projects, eliminating middlemen, thereby strengthening democratic foundations by returning power to the people .

Banning French in Mrchtem's schools contradicts Belgium's power sharing framework designed to maintain linguistic harmony. Such a measure risks civil unrest by disrupting peace between linguistic communities, undermining Belgium's bilingual approach aimed at integration. Instead, a bilingual system reflects equitable power sharing and cultural respect, fostering social cohesion .

Power sharing minimizes arbitrariness by dispersing power across various institutions and interest groups, preventing concentrated control. It ensures participation by engaging different communities and political ideologies, fostering inclusivity and responsiveness in government actions, which is crucial for democratic health .

Belgium’s shift from a unitary to federal structure exemplifies power sharing by respecting linguistic and regional diversities, thereby averting national fragmentation along language lines. This transformation dispersed power between regional governments, accommodating diverse groups and promoting national unity through shared governance .

You might also like