0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views6 pages

Understanding Competency-Based Education

Uploaded by

fadouabel302
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views6 pages

Understanding Competency-Based Education

Uploaded by

fadouabel302
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

COMPETENCY BASED APPROACH

The concept of competence-based teaching and learning means


different things to different people. In fact, there is no single
agreed definition of the concept because professionals define it
from different contexts. There are many terms used to refer to
competence-based teaching and learning. Such terms include
competence-based education, competence-based curriculum,
proficiency-based education, outcome-based education,
mastery-based education, standard-based education and
performance-based education.

In his book "Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching",


Richards describes CBLT as follows:
"Competency-Based Language Teaching focuses on what
learners are expected to do with the language, rather than on
knowledge about the language. It is a performance-based
approach to teaching that emphasizes the use of language in
specific contexts."

Auerbach (1986) provides a useful review of


factors involved in the implementation of CBE
programs in ESL, and identifies eight key
features:
1. A focus on successful functioning in society.
The goal is to enable students to become
autonomous individuals capable of coping
with the demands of the world.
2. A focus on life skills. Rather than teaching
language in isolation,
CBLT teaches language as a function of
communication about concrete tasks.
Students are taught just those language
forms/skills required by the situations in which
they will function. These forms are determined
by “empirical assessment of language
required” (Findley
and Nathan 1980: 224).
3. Task- or performance-centered orientation.
What counts is what students can do as a
result of instruction. The emphasis is on overt
behaviors rather than on knowledge or the
ability to talk about language and skills.
4. Modularized instruction. “Language
learning is broken down into manageable and
immediately meaningful chunks” (Center for
Applied Linguistics 1983: 2). Objectives are
broken into narrowly
focused sub objectives so that both teachers
and students can get a clear sense of
progress.
5. Outcomes that are made explicit a priori.
Outcomes are public knowledge, known and
agreed upon by both learner and teacher.
They are specified in terms of behavioral
objectives so that students know exactly what
behaviors are expected of them.
6. Continuous and ongoing assessment.
Students are pretested to determine what
skills they lack and post tested after
instruction in that skill.
If they do not achieve the desired level of
mastery, they continue to work on the
objective and are retested. Program
evaluation is based
on test results and, as such, is considered
objectively quantifiable.
7. Demonstrated mastery of performance
objectives. Rather than the
traditional paper-and-pencil tests, assessment
is based on the ability to demonstrate
prespecified behaviors.
8. Individualized, student-centered
instruction. In content, level, and pace,
objectives are defined in terms of individual
needs; prior learning and achievement are
taken into account in developing curricula.
Instruction is not time-based; students
progress at their own rates and
concentrate on just those areas in which they
lack competence.
MERITS
There are said to be several advantages of a
competencies approach
from the learner’s point of view:
1. The competencies are specific and practical
and can be seen to relate to
the learner’s needs and interests.
2. The learner can judge whether the
competencies seem relevant and
useful.
146
3. The competencies that will be taught and
tested are specific and public – hence the
learner knows exactly what needs to be
learned.
4. Competencies can be mastered one at a
time so the learner can see what has been
learned and what still remains to be learned.
syllabus
Jack C. Richards emphasizes that a competency-based
syllabus:
 Encourages practical application of language.
 Focuses on the functional use of language rather
than theoretical knowledge.
 Reflects the needs of the learners and the specific
context in which they will use the language.
Components of a Competency-Based Syllabus
1. Competency Statements:
o Clearly articulated outcomes that learners should

achieve (e.g., "Can use past tense verbs to describe


previous work experience").
2. Performance Indicators:
o Specific behaviors or actions that show a competency

has been mastered (e.g., "Accurately uses 80% of past


tense verbs in an oral narrative").
3. Content Areas:
o Topics or themes are included as a framework for

contextualizing competencies (e.g., travel, health,


education).
4. Tasks and Activities:
o Activities designed to help learners develop and

practice the competencies.


o Examples: role-playing, simulations, completing

forms, group discussions.


5. Assessment Tools:
o Tools such as checklists, rubrics, and task-based

evaluations to measure performance.


o Example: a rubric for assessing a formal email's

grammar, tone, and organization.

Example of a Competency-Based Syllabus Unit


Unit Theme: Workplace Communication
Competencies:
 Greet and introduce oneself and others in a formal setting.
 Write a professional email to a colleague.
 Participate in a team meeting and contribute ideas
effectively.
Tasks:
 Practice greeting and introductions through role-playing.
 Draft a professional email based on a given scenario.
 Conduct a mock meeting with assigned roles for discussion.
Assessment:
 Checklist for greeting and introductions.
 Rubric for assessing email clarity, format, and tone.
 Observation and feedback for meeting participation.
,

Common questions

Powered by AI

CBE promotes individualized learning by tailoring content, level, and pace to individual needs, taking into account prior learning and achievement. Instruction is not time-based, allowing students to progress at their own rates and focus specifically on areas where they lack competence . This leads to personalized educational experiences, enabling students to proceed only after mastering specific competencies, which may result in increased motivation and engagement as students can see tangible progress based on their individual efforts .

Individualized, student-centered instruction is effective in improving language competency outcomes as it allows for teaching to be tailored to the student's individual pace, learning style, and specific linguistic needs . This approach accommodates diverse learner backgrounds and experiences, enabling personalized feedback and support, which can lead to enhanced motivation and engagement. By focusing on individual deficiencies and progressively building on existing skills, it supports the efficient development of language competencies tailored to a student's context and goals, often resulting in higher achievement rates and better retention of language skills . However, it requires dedicated resources and skilled instructors to balance individual learning needs with class dynamics .

CBLT differentiates itself from traditional language teaching by focusing on performance rather than knowledge about the language. This approach emphasizes the use of language in specific contexts to enable successful functioning in society. It highlights teaching language as a function of communication about concrete tasks rather than in isolation . Additionally, CBLT involves task- or performance-centered orientation, modularized instruction, and outcomes that are made explicit a priori, contrasting with the typical structure of traditional language teaching .

Transparency of learning outcomes is crucial in Competency-Based Education because it ensures that learners are fully aware of what is expected of them and what they must achieve. By making competencies specific, public, and explicitly defined, learners can assess their relevance and utility, leading to a clear sense of direction and purpose in their studies . This transparency can boost motivation as students understand exactly what they need to work on and achieve, potentially increasing focus, engagement, and ownership of their learning goals .

Competency-based assessments differ from traditional assessments by focusing on demonstrated mastery of specific performance objectives rather than testing theoretical knowledge through paper-and-pencil tests. These assessments are typically based on the ability to perform tasks and solve problems in authentic contexts, requiring students to demonstrate skills and understanding through practical applications . This approach can lead to more meaningful educational outcomes as it ensures that learners can apply their knowledge effectively in real-world situations. It arguably promotes deeper learning and skills retention, aligning educational outcomes more closely with the demands of society .

Explicit and public outcomes in a competency-based education model are significant because they ensure that both teachers and students have a shared understanding of the expectations and objectives of the learning process. This transparency fosters a clear framework for instruction and assessment, allowing teachers to align their teaching strategies with student goals . It positively influences the teacher-student relationship by fostering mutual accountability and collaboration, as both parties work towards clearly defined and agreed-upon objectives. As a result, it can enhance trust and open communication, creating a more effective and motivational learning environment .

A competency-based syllabus can be aligned with learners' needs by establishing clear competency statements that directly reflect the linguistic demands learners will face, thereby ensuring relevance to their personal or professional goals . Performance indicators should be tailored to specific contexts in which learners expect to use the language, such as workplace communication or social interactions. Additionally, tasks and activities must be relevant and practical, such as role-playing common scenarios the learners are likely to encounter, ensuring the skills being taugth are immediately applicable . Aligning assessment tools to reflect real-world language use further reinforces this alignment, facilitating practical application of language skills in their intended contexts .

Task- and performance-centered orientation plays a key role in structuring Competency-Based Language syllabi by emphasizing the application of language skills in practical, real-world tasks. The syllabi focus on defining clear competencies and performance indicators that learners need to achieve in specific contexts, and then designing activities like role-plays, simulations, and group discussions to practice these skills . This orientation drives the curriculum to shift from abstract grammar knowledge to actionable language use, ensuring that learners are prepared for actual language use in societal interactions, significantly impacting how language education is delivered and assessed .

The continuous assessment process in CBLT benefits learners by providing ongoing feedback and opportunities for improvement. Students are pretested to identify areas of deficiency and post-tested after obtaining instruction in those areas. If mastery is not achieved, students continue to work on the objectives, ensuring comprehension and skill acquisition before moving on . This method reinforces learning, helps solidify knowledge in a practical manner, and prevents students from progressing with gaps in understanding, ultimately leading to enhanced competence and confidence .

The benefits of implementing a modularized instruction approach in CBE include breaking down learning into manageable and meaningful chunks, allowing for clear articulation of progress for both teachers and students . This granularity helps in pinpointing specific needs and adapting teaching strategies to address them effectively. However, challenges include the potential for increased complexity in curriculum planning and the need for robust assessment mechanisms to ensure accurate tracking of each module's mastery. Teachers may also require additional training to effectively implement and manage modularized learning paths .

You might also like