Nonlinear Model of Asset Dynamics
Nonlinear Model of Asset Dynamics
Keywords
Nonlinear dynamic model; Strange attractor; Life cycle; Econometric models; Asset manage-
ment.
sets. It is important to determine the reasons upon then the occurrence short-term fluctuations may lead
which there have been significant changes in certain to a nonlinear development of fixed assets lifecycle of
elements. Often, the changes in fixed assets are af- the industry and to fluctuations in the dynamics of
fected by the reconstruction, division or merger of an their development. The active production assets life-
enterprise, the changes in the organizational structure cycle averages 10-15 years and this cycle can be com-
and management system, improvement of production pared with the economic cycle of average duration
processes and forms of labour organization; restora- (Juglar cycle). To the reasons for economic cyclicality,
tion of worn and obsolete assets; the level of industrial C. Juglar added a delay in making investment deci-
specialization and cooperation; the change in the en- sions by launching new production facilities. In addi-
terprise geographical location, etc. tion, this includes the time lag between the decrease
It is very important to use fixed assets efficiently, in sales and the liquidation of operational capacities.
that is, all of their elements should in a sense con- As a result, C. Juglar cycles acquire additional dura-
tribute to the production, increase the provided ser- tion (Tuyakova & Cheremushnikova, 2016). Fixed as-
vices or achieve other purposes of the enterprise. To sets lifecycle is presented in the form of a diagram in
assess the efficiency of using fixed assets, it is sug- Figure 2. The diagram clearly shows the main Juglar
gested to evaluate them using various comparative cycle phases, such as recovery, upswings, recession and
coefficients (Nicolis & Prigozhin, 1990). depression.
tion to disposal (Lutkevich, 2022). EAM is mainly that different asset classes undergo different lifecycle
used in industries that depend heavily on expensive stages. The choice of commercial equipment, such as
and complex physical assets such as vehicles, facto- dump trucks and rolling stock, can be an important
ries and heavy equipment, more often this is done decision, but the project stage is primarily an acqui-
with specialised EAM software. It is often used for sition stage, and not a complex design and assembly
this purpose, as it can provide a holistic view of an stage. Likewise, such stages as commissioning, trial
organization’s physical assets throughout their entire period and overclocking are likely to be fast events
lifecycle (Facility Force, 2023). The known users in- that do not require particular attention (Medvedieva
clude the oil and gas, shipbuilding, mining, energy, & Ahapova, 2020). But the managing of various pro-
government, utilities, aerospace and defence indus- duction stages still requires significant attention. Sim-
tries. Asset lifecycle management (ALM) is one of ilar comments can be made for facilities, information
the common features of the EAM software. There technologies (IT) and line assets, each of them goes
are four stages of asset lifecycle management, which through lifecycle stages in its own way with its own
include planning, procurement/acquisition, operation unique problems and requirements.
and maintenance, and disposal (Comparesoft, 2023). In the direction of studying the fluctuations impact
It covers the main stages of an asset’s lifecycle from on the development of fixed assets, it is necessary to
its initial design to planning for its production or con- consider how short-term fluctuations affect the pro-
struction, if it is a building or other infrastructure, in- duction in general, and, as a result, the development
cluding warranty management, decommissioning and of fixed assets in the industry. There are four major
disposal. ALM is a restricted approach to fixed as- factors that cause both long-term trends and short-
sets managing and includes a set of interrelated it- term fluctuations in the market. These factors are gov-
erative processes. During the design and assemble ernment, international transactions, speculation and
stage of a project, programs are managed to com- expectation, and supply and demand. Economic activ-
plete the project, at a much longer stage of operation ity can influence market trends, for the better or for
and maintenance, the process focuses on asset per- the worse. Government policy and geopolitical events
formance management, portfolio assets and project are factors that can lead to either stability or insta-
management leads the overall investment portfolio in bility in markets. Higher interest rates and taxes, for
assets in accordance with the strategic purposes of the example, can deter spending and result in a contrac-
company (Sheilagh, 2021). tion or a long-term fall in market prices. In the short
The fixed assets lifecycle model presented in this term, these news releases can cause large price swings
article has many more stages than the traditional as traders and investors buy and sell in response to
model on which fixed assets lifecycle management ap- the information (Mitchell, 2022). Fixed assets are for
proaches mentioned above are based (Hrabynska & long-term use and include land, buildings, leasehold
Kosarchyn, 2022). The weaknesses of the traditional improvements, equipment, machinery, and vehicles.
model with regard to short-term fluctuations (busi- Depreciation is listed with the cost of goods sold if
ness processes) are not in what activities they cover, the expense associated with the fixed asset is used in
but in the lack of sufficient detail to see the main life- the direct production of inventory. Examples include
cycle stages that support these processes and how the the purchase of production equipment and machinery
processes interact (Kozyk et al., 2018). Based on the and a building that houses a production plant (John
analysis, separate processes for operation, optimisa- F. Kennedy Memorial Library, 2023).
tion, maintenance and improvement have been iden- With short-term fluctuations, output gaps occur
tified, although they can be a part of the same or- between the actual and potential production of goods.
ganisational unit for operation and maintenance, the The output gap G is the difference between the actual
tasks and purposes of the people responsible for op- output of a product and its potential output in rela-
erating and maintaining the facility are completely tion to the potential output at a certain period in time
different. Another point to note is that the same de- and is described by the following formula:
sign, assembly, operation, optimisation, maintenance
and improvement processes are used for all of the or- G = [(Y − Y ∗)/Y ∗] × 100 (1)
ganisation’s assets. This is an important point that
is absent in the traditional model. While some of the where: Y ∗ is a potential output (Schuman &
individuals who perform these processes can be as- Brent, 2005).
sociated with a particular project or asset, the pro- Potential output, in turn, is the maximum sustain-
cesses themselves are not specific for a project or plant able output rate that the industry can produce, also
(Alieksieiev et al., 2014). It is also should be noted called output at full employment, using capital and
labour at higher rates than usual and exceeding Y ∗ Indication of the nonlinear function through
for a certain period of time. It is stated that the pro- formula (3):
duction potential output grows over time, while the
actual output grows at a variable rate and reflects the fi (pi , xi , Li wi , r, k)
growth rate Y ∗, which takes into account the vari-
n
able rates of technical innovation, capital accumula- 1 X 1 − hi
= κ (1 − η) 1 − aij pj (t) +
tion, weather conditions, etc. At the same time, the Pi (t) j=1
1 + r(t)
actual output is not always equal to the potential out-
put (Blanchard, 2020). Based on the system analysis αi −1 βir(t)Fik (t)
× (xi (t)) (Li (t)) −
of a nonlinear dynamic mathematical model, it was xi (t)Pi (t)
determined that the development dynamics of fixed w (t)
asset of a separate industry strikes with an unimag- − (1 − γ) i Li (t) (3)
xi (t)
inable variety of behaviour types varying from simple
equilibrium points to multiple periodic (fluctuations) The nonlinear function was replaced in (2) and ob-
or chaotic depending on the value of some generalised tain the following expression of formula (4):
coefficient. Moreover, this complex behaviour is asso-
ciated with the loss of stability in the development fi (pi , xi , Li wi , r, k) =
of a fixed asset and the economic system as a whole.
n
The development dynamics of fixed assets of the i- 1 X 1 − hi
κ (1 − η) 1 − aij pj (t) + ×
th industry xi (t) of the economic system is described Pi (t) j=1 1 + r(t)
by the mathematical model of a multi-industry econ-
omy by a nonlinear system of differential equations αi −1 βi r(t)Fik (t)
(xi (t)) (Li (t)) − −
presented in formula 1 (Beisenbi, 2019): xi (t)Pi (t)
wi (t)
(1 − γ) Li (t), (4)
"
dxi (t) 1 xi (t)
= xi (t) κ(1 − η)
dt Txi
The first approximation was represented relatively
n to x(t) and equation (2) at fixed values pj (t) = pj0 ,
1 − 1 X 1 − hi
aij pj (t) + pi (t) = pi0 , xi (t) = xi0 , Li (t) = Li0 , r(t) = r0 ,
Pi (t) j=1 1 + r(t)
Fik (t) = Fi0
k
, wi (t) = wi0 as formula (5):
α−1 β r(t)Fik (t)
× (xi (t)) (Li (t)) − dx α γ1
xi (t)Pi (t) = x(1 − x) (5)
# dt T α
wi (t)
− (1 − γ) Li (t) − µi , where in formulas (6) and (7):
xi (t)
i = 1, . . . , n (2) T = Txi , x = xi (t), α = β − µi ,
n
where: Txi is the time constant of fixed assets that 1 X 1 − hi
β = κi (1 − η) 1 − aij pj0 +
characterises the development dynamics of fixed as- pi0 j=1 1 + r0 (6)
sets of the i-th industry; κi , αi and βi are the parame-
k
ters of production function (αi +βi = 1), respectively; αi−1 βi r0 Fi0 wi0
(xi0 ) (Li0 ) − − (1 − γ) Li0
η is the tax rate on the income of the industry; αij xi0 Pi0 xi0
is the coefficient of material consumption of the i-th
products type for the j-th product; pj (t) is the price of γ1 = (αi − 1) κ(1 − η)
n
!
the j-th product; pi (t) is the price of products of the i- 1 X 1 − hi βi
th industry; hi is the share of the repaid loan from the 1− aij pj0 + (Li0 )
pi0 i=1 1 + r0
loan amount received by the i-th industry; r(t) is the
k
interest rate on the loan capital; L(t) is the number of αi −2 1 r0 Fi0 w i0
(xi0 ) + 2 + (1 − γ) 2 (7)
employees in the i-th industry of the economy; µi is 2 pi0 (xi0 ) 2 (xi0 )
the retirement rate of fixed assets of the i-th industry
of the economy; Fik (t) is the amount of credit funds The logistic equation (5) with ∆t = 1 can be repre-
of the i-th industry invested in the production devel- sented as a one-dimensional mapping in formula (8):
opment; γ is the social insurance coefficient; w i (t) is α γ1
the wages level in the labour market. xn+1 = 1 + xn 1 − xn (8)
T α
Whence it follows that D < 0 at α < 2T , therefore, The mechanism of further development of events is
at T < α < 2T the fixed points of the function ϕ2 (x) similar: at a certain value of the parameter (2.54 . . .)
α α T < α < α∞ = (2.56699 . . .) T (another bifurcation
are only the points x1 = 0 and x2 = If α ≥
T +αγ point) a stable cycle of order 2n−1 of the function
2T , then D ≥ 0 and (18): ϕ(x) splits into two, which form the cycle of order 2n ,
r ! (n = 1, 2, . . .). In this case, the “old” cycle loses the at-
α 2T + α α − 2T tractor properties, transferring them to the new cycle,
x3,4 = 1∓ (18)
2γ T + α α + 2T and αn is finite. Moreover, it turns out that αn < 3T .
Thus, the function ϕ(x) has cycles of order 2n at all
Note that at α = 2T three fixed points coincide natural n. The successive bifurcations of doubling pe-
α α
x2 = x3 = x4 = . The function derivatives riods of the attracting cycle of mapping (7) occur up
T +αγ to the value α = α∞ = T (2.5699 . . .), at which the
ϕ2 (x) at these points ϕ2 (x3 ) and ϕ2 (x4 ) do not exceed attracting cycle reaches an infinitely long period, and
unity in absolute value: cycles of periods 2n , n = 1, 2, . . ., will be repulsive.
2 2 The quadratic mapping (7) in this case does not have
2 T +α γ 2 α cycles of other periods. At α∞ < α ≤ 4T the map-
ϕ (x3 ) =
T α γ2 ping has cycles with any period, including aperiodic
α T +αα T +α 2 trajectories. Such trajectories during the successive it-
− 2 x−2 x+6 x erations will wander in an irregular, chaotic manner
γ T γ T
α T +α α
T +αγ 3
inside a quadrilateral of length and width
−4 x ≤1 (19) γ T 4γ
T α x=x3 Thus, at α < α∞ mapping (7) has a single stable cycle
of period 2n , which, apart from a set ofmeasure zero,
and: α
attracts all points from the segment 0, . When
2 2 γ
2 T +α γ 2 α α > α∞ , the dynamics of mapping (7) becomes more
ϕ (x4 ) =
T α γ2 complex. In this case, there are aperiodic trajecto-
α T +αα T +α 2 ries that are not attracted to cycles. The sequence of
− 2 x−2 x+6 x values αn , at which period doubling bifurcations are
γ T γ T
observed, satisfies the simple law (21):
T +αγ 3
−4 x ≤ 1. (20) αn − αn−1
T α x=x3 = δ = 4.6692 . . . (21)
αn+1 − αn
This means that for the function ϕ2 (x) they are at-
The number δ is the Feigenbaum universal con-
tractors, therefore the corresponding second-order cy-
stant. It shows that the sequence of doubling bifur-
cle of the function ϕ(x) is an attractor. At α ∼
= 2T the
cations is universal. From the above conducted anal-
cycle doubled, a second-order cycle emerged from the
ysis of the fixed asset development model, it follows
first-order cycle, and the attraction property passed
that fixed assets and the economic system as a whole
to this new cycle, such values of the α parameter are
is developed without fluctuations as long as the con-
called bifurcation points. What happens with a fur-
ditions α ≤ 2T are met. Under certain relations be-
ther increase in the parameter α? Here it is necessary
tween the values of the growth rate of fixed assets
to consider already three functions ϕ(x), ϕ2 (x) and
α : α1 < α2 < . . . < αn < . . ., and time constant T
ϕ4 (x). The last of these functions is (in x) an 8th de-
the interval (2T < α < α∞ = T ∗ 2.5699 . . .) corre-
gree polynomial.√Its fixed points up to the value of the
sponds to the infinite sequence of bifurcations, each of
parameter α ≤ 6T are√only four fixed points of the
which leads to cycles of a higher order with a period
function ϕ2 (x). At α ≤ 6T , the function derivatives
doubling at each successive bifurcation. The values are
ϕ2 (x) at the points x1 , x2 , x3 and become equal to
accumulated near some special value α∞ , after which
1, and with further growth of α pairs of the function
orbits with an “infinite period” are obtained, that is,
fixed points ϕ4 (x) appear near each of them. For the
a strongly pronounced chaotic behaviour. Ultimately,
ϕ2 (x) function, these points form two stable cycles of
the entire space of the dynamical system states, de-
the second-order, and for the function ϕ(x) they form T +αα
a stable cycle of the fourth-order. At α > (2.54 . . .)T fined by the area of a quadrilateral of width
4T γ
this cycle becomes unstable, and it is replaced by the α
stable cycle of the period 8, etc. and length turns out to belong to a single chaotic
γ
Hrabynska, I., & Kosarchyn, M. (2022). Factors in the Mankiw, G.Í. (2002). Principles of Economics. Piter,
formation of super-cycles in world commodity mar- Russia.
kets. Economics of Development, 21(2), 19–27. DOI: Medvedieva, I., & Ahapova, M. (2020). Simulation of the
10.57111/econ.21(2).2022.19-27. capital structure of an enterprise taking into account
John F. Kennedy Memorial Library. (2023). BUS 5026 the dynamics of parameters of the external environ-
Global Business Environment. [Link] ment. Economics of Development, 19(2), 44–59. DOI:
[Link]/[Link]?g=1272092&p=9332314, [accessed 10.21511/ed.19(2).2020.05.
on 25th August 2023] Mitchell, C. (2022). 4 Factors That Shape Market Trends.
[Link]
King A.M. (2011). Internal Control of Fixed Assets: [Link], [accessed on 8th July
A Controller and Auditor’s Guide. John Wiley & 2023]
Sons, the USA.
Nicolis, G., & Prigozhin, I. (1990). Knowledge of the com-
Kozyk, V., Zalutska, Kh., & Zalutsky, V. (2018). Hy- plex. Mir, Russia.
brid development of modern enterprises. Economics,
Entrepreneurship, Management, 5(1), 39–46. DOI: Ruelle, D., & Tacens, F. (1971). On the nature of turbu-
10.23939/eem2018.01.039. lence. Communicative Mathematical. Physics, 20(2),
67–192.
Kurmanov, S. (2023). Various production planning mod-
els for manufacturing execution systems. Scientific Schuman, C.A., & Brent, A.C. (2005). Asset life cycle
Horizons, 26(1), 111–120. DOI: 10.48077/scihor.26 management: towards improving physical asset per-
(1).2023.111-120. formance in the process industry. International Jour-
nal of Operations & Production Management, 25,
Lenart, L., & Pipien, M. (2013). Almost Periodically
566–579. DOI: 10.1108/01443570510599728.
Correlated Time Series in Business Fluctuations.
Analysis Proceedings of the 6th Polish Symposium of Senchukov, V. (2019). The solution of optimization prob-
Physics in Economy and Social Sciences, 123(2), 567– lems in the economy by overlaying integer lattices:
583. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2006343. Applied aspect. Economics of Development, 18(1),
Li, T., & Yorke, J.A. (1975). Period three implies chaos. 44–55. DOI: 10.21511/ed.18(1).2019.05.
American Math Monthly, 82, 985-992. DOI: 10.2307/ Sheilagh, O. (2021). The European Guilds: An Economic
2318254. Analysis. Princeton University Press, the USA.
Liapis, K.J., & Kantianis, D.D. (2015). Depreciations Tamulevińienĺ, D., & Mackevičius, J. (2019). Method-
methods and life-cycle costing (LCC) methodology. ology of complex analysis of tangible fixed assets.
Procedia: Economics and Finance, 19, 314–324. DOI: Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 7(8),
10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00032-5. 1341–1352. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(38).
Lu, Y., & Su, M. (2011). Asset allocation model across
Tuyakova, Z.S., & Cheremushnikova, T.V. (2016). Fea-
business cycle. International Conference on Business
tures of accounting and evaluation of fixed assets at
Management and Electronic Information, 2, 327–330.
various stages of their life cycle in accordance with
DOI: 10.1109/ICBMEI.2011.5917913.
the requirements of IFRS. International Accounting,
Lutkevich, B., & Essex, D. (2022). Enterprise Asset Man- 38, 2–23.
agement (EAM). [Link]