0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views4 pages

Hydraulic Network Evaluation Report

The document provides a detailed hydraulic analysis of a fluid network, including node, pipe, tank, and pump data, highlighting issues such as constant demands at nodes and low pressures. It warns of missing secondary losses in pipes and suggests improvements for efficiency and design. Additionally, it evaluates the performance of the pump and tank, recommending adjustments for better network functionality.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views4 pages

Hydraulic Network Evaluation Report

The document provides a detailed hydraulic analysis of a fluid network, including node, pipe, tank, and pump data, highlighting issues such as constant demands at nodes and low pressures. It warns of missing secondary losses in pipes and suggests improvements for efficiency and design. Additionally, it evaluates the performance of the pump and tank, recommending adjustments for better network functionality.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Data and Output from file File Baru

Fluid viscosity : 0,000001


Friction loss equation : Hazen Williams

WARNING
****
Secondary loss in the pipes are missing. For more realistic design you should add
secondary
A relatively long pipes model in the software may contain several pipes in reality
depending on the real length of each pipe
****
Demands type of pattern at nodes are Constant
Average demand is applied to all nodes. Please consider the maximum demand
condition

Node Data (At time 48 for extended flow)


Absolute Relative
Node Ground Elv Energy Energy Demand Notation
( m ) ( m ) ( m ) ( l/s )

1 196,39 196,39 0,00 0,00


2 196,67 196,38 -0,29 0,00 upstream
208,18 downstream
3 196,94 208,17 11,23 0,00
4 196,85 208,15 11,30 0,00
5 191,00 208,10 17,10 0,09
6 191,11 208,05 16,94 0,12
7 194,00 207,99 13,99 0,05
8 191,30 207,93 16,63 0,18
9 189,12 207,89 18,77 0,16
10 189,04 207,88 18,84 0,12
11 184,20 207,81 23,61 0,18
12 182,00 207,69 25,69 0,16
13 176,00 207,60 31,60 0,05
14 174,98 207,54 32,56 0,00
15 178,05 207,46 29,41 0,10
16 175,25 207,39 32,14 0,12
17 0,00 207,32 207,32 0,08
18 179,60 207,25 27,65 0,00
19 179,00 207,23 28,23 0,05
20 188,00 207,15 19,15 0,25
21 187,33 207,14 19,81 0,16
22 188,00 207,14 19,14 0,08
23 184,47 207,11 22,64 0,08
24 186,28 207,10 20,82 0,00
25 188,59 207,08 18,49 0,08
26 192,46 207,07 14,61 0,25

Pipes and flow data (at time 48 for extended flow)

From To
Pipe Node Node Length Diameter Dischg C hf Slope
( m ) ( m ) ( l/s ) ( m ) m / m
1 1 2 10,00 0,1400 3,85150,0000 0,008 0,0008
2 2 3 10,00 0,1400 3,85150,0000 0,008 0,0008
3 3 4 10,00 0,1400 3,84150,0000 0,019 0,0019
4 4 5 95,23 0,1140 2,40150,0000 0,052 0,0005
5 5 6 99,75 0,1140 2,31150,0000 0,051 0,0005
6 6 7 113,79 0,1140 2,19150,0000 0,053 0,0005
7 7 8 136,24 0,1140 2,14150,0000 0,060 0,0004
8 8 9 115,09 0,1140 1,95150,0000 0,043 0,0004
9 9 10 45,76 0,1140 1,79150,0000 0,015 0,0003
10 10 11 228,21 0,1140 1,67150,0000 0,064 0,0003
11 11 12 166,92 0,0890 1,48150,0000 0,126 0,0008
12 12 13 137,79 0,0890 1,32150,0000 0,084 0,0006
13 13 14 113,07 0,0890 1,27150,0000 0,064 0,0006
14 14 15 147,29 0,0890 1,26150,0000 0,083 0,0006
15 15 16 147,99 0,0890 1,16150,0000 0,071 0,0005
16 16 17 157,41 0,0890 1,04150,0000 0,061 0,0004
17 17 18 229,88 0,0890 0,96150,0000 0,077 0,0003
18 18 19 57,54 0,0890 0,95150,0000 0,019 0,0003
19 19 20 246,84 0,0890 0,90150,0000 0,074 0,0003
20 20 21 65,97 0,0890 0,66150,0000 0,011 0,0002
21 21 22 16,50 0,0760 0,49150,0000 0,004 0,0002
22 22 23 161,01 0,0760 0,41150,0000 0,025 0,0002
23 23 24 138,90 0,0760 0,33150,0000 0,014 0,0001
24 24 25 166,65 0,0760 0,33150,0000 0,016 0,0001
25 25 26 228,45 0,0760 0,25150,0000 0,013 0,0001

Pump data

Pump number : 1
Pump status : ON
Design Discharge = 2,39 ( l/s )
Design Head = 25 ( m )
Operating Discharge = 3,85 ( l/s )
Operating Head = 11,8 ( m )
Assumed Optimum Efficiency = 95 %
Approximated running Efficiency = 38,57 %

Tank Data

Tank Number 1
Tank shape : Prismatic
Area = 48 ( m 2)
Maximum Elevation = 216,85 ( m )
Minimum Elevation = 207,85 ( m )
Elevation during simulation = 208,15 ( m )

----------------------------------------------------
COMMENT AND EVALUATION
----------------------------------------------------

The following general comments are based on hydraulics performance of the network.

The comments are aimed at suggesting whether the network need updating
The comments are devided into 1. Node, 2. Pipe, 3. Tank, 4. Pump, and their
interactions
---------------------------------------------------
GENERAL COMMENT AND EVALUATION
---------------------------------------------------

The flow is steady state (average condition).


Consider simulating with the maximum velocity during peak hour that can be as high
as 1.6 of the average velocity
Higher velocity means higher head loss needed to flow the water
---------------------------------------------------
COMMENT ON RESERVOIRS
---------------------------------------------------

Number of reservoir in the network 1


Reservoir elevation 1 = 196,389999389648
Maximum reservoir elevation = 196,389999389648
Minimum reservoir elevation = 196,389999389648

The capacity of reservoir 1 has been assumed as unlimited. Edit the reservoir if
necessary

---------------------------------------------------
COMMENT ON NODES
---------------------------------------------------
The ratio between the maximum average demand of all nodes and the minimum average
demand of all nodes = 61,25
The range of demand is too high, check the high and low demands in the network

The demand of one or more nodes are constant. Chek the demand. The following are
the nodes with constant demands
Node 5 , Node 6 , Node 7 , Node 8 , Node 9 , Node 10 , Node 11 , Node 12 ,
Node 13 , Node 14 , Node 15 , Node 16 , Node 17 , Node 18 , Node 19 , Node
20 , Node 21 , Node 22 , Node 23 , Node 24 , Node 25 , Node 26
All demands at nodes are constant(no fluctuation) This is not realistic, correct
the demands (ignore when intended)

Number of demand patterns available = 10


Number of demand patterns used = 1
Check whether there is a demand pattern which is not required

The minimum pressure in node(s) are negative (for example node 7 ). This node is
not capable of distributing water in the node's area

The network was simulated under average demand. The coefficient at all nodes is 1
Low pressure at nodes, for example node 7 may even lower during peak flow (during
early in the morning or evening). Use EXTENDED simulation for more complete results

---------------------------------------------------
COMMENT ON PIPES
---------------------------------------------------

All pipes in the network is the same [Link] you sure to use the same pipe type?.
Consider stronger pipe like GI when the pipe is not underground
There are 25 stright pipes
Among the stright pipes, there are 25 pipes without secondary loss coefficient such
as bends
Parts or all of the secndary loss coefficient along the pipes are small. Consider
to use secondary coefficient at least = 1.0 for each pipes
Correct the pipes data

Following are pipes with too large diameter (Ignore if it is intentionally


assigned)
Pipes 1 , Pipes 2 , Pipes 3 , Pipes 4 , Pipes 5 , Pipes 6 , Pipes 7 , Pipes
8 , Pipes 9 , Pipes 10 , Pipes 11 , Pipes 12 , Pipes 13 , Pipes 14 , Pipes
15 , Pipes 16 , Pipes 17 , Pipes 18 , Pipes 19 , Pipes 20 , Pipes 21 , Pipes
22 , Pipes 23 , Pipes 24 , Pipes 25 ,

---------------------------------------------------
COMMENT ON TANKS
---------------------------------------------------

Size of tank 1 is much larger than normal. Tray to reduce it

Height of tank 1 0 to 4 meters underground, check again

---------------------------------------------------
COMMENT/ EVALUATION ON PRESSURE REMOVAL BOX
---------------------------------------------------

Tidak ada BPT dalam jaringan

---------------------------------------------------
COMMENT ABOUT PUMPS
---------------------------------------------------

There is 1 pump in the network


Pump 1 very inefficient. Consider different pump size

End of Report
Printed on 15/12/2024

You might also like