0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views11 pages

Reliability Analysis of Non-Repairable Systems

The document discusses the reliability of non-repairable systems, focusing on duty cycles, competing failure modes, and mixed populations. It outlines how to model system reliability using Weibull distributions and the impact of duty cycles on reliability calculations. Additionally, it explores conditional reliability and hazard rate functions for components from mixed populations and provides examples for plotting these functions under varying conditions.

Uploaded by

Aniket Adsule
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views11 pages

Reliability Analysis of Non-Repairable Systems

The document discusses the reliability of non-repairable systems, focusing on duty cycles, competing failure modes, and mixed populations. It outlines how to model system reliability using Weibull distributions and the impact of duty cycles on reliability calculations. Additionally, it explores conditional reliability and hazard rate functions for components from mixed populations and provides examples for plotting these functions under varying conditions.

Uploaded by

Aniket Adsule
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Reliability of Non Repairable Systems

Duty Cycles

Components of a system may not operate continuously during a system's mission. To model this, a

factor called the Duty Cycle (dc) is used.

Consider a system with three components: A, B and C in series. Assume that all three components

follow a Weibull failure distribution with the parameters βA = 1.5, ηA = 5000 for A, βB = 2.5, ηB = 3000 for

B and βC = 2, ηC = 4000 for C. Determine the reliability of the system for 1500 hr of operation given that

it has worked for 1000 hr since installation. Assume the duty cycles to be 30%, 50% and 100% for A, B

and C.

How much will be the error if we ignore duty cycles ?


Competing Failure Modes

Often, a group of products will fail due to more than one failure mode.

One can take the view that the products could have failed due to any one of the possible failure

modes, but since an item cannot fail more than one time, there can only be one failure mode for

each failed product.

In this view, the failure modes compete as to which causes the failure for each particular item.

This can be viewed as a series system reliability model, with each failure mode composing a block

of the series system.


n
R(t )   RFM i
i 1
Reliability and hazard rate functions of mixed population

The reliability of a component drawn at random from a mixed population composed of n types of

failure subpopulations is its reliability, R1(T), given that the component is from subpopulation 1, or

N1/N plus its reliability, R2(T), given that the component is from subpopulation 2, or N2/N and ………

so on

N1 N N
f (t )  f1 (t )  2 f 2 (t )  ........... n f n (t )
N N N
h(t) = f(t) / R(t) Where, S (Ni / N) = 1
N1 N N
R(t )  R1 (t )  2 R2 (t )  ........... n Rn (t )
N N N
Conditional reliability and hazard rate functions

N1 N N
R1 (T  t )  2 R2 (T  t )  ........... n Rn (T  t )
R(t | T )  N N N
N1 N N
R1 (T )  2 R2 (T )  ........... n Rn (T )
N N N

Plot this function for a mixed population with components having exponential Time To
Failure (TTF) distribution.
Conditional Reliability function

Consider a component drawn at random from a mixed population composed of 2 types of failure

subpopulations with failure rate λ1 = 0.001 given that the component is from subpopulation 1,

and λ2 = 0.005 given that the component is from subpopulation 2. Proportion of type 1 and type 2

population components are 0.8 and 0.2 respectively.

Plot the hazard rate function.

How will the function look like if the proportions become 0.2 and 0.8 respectively?
Hazard Rate of individual populations

Sub-population 1 Sub-population 2
0.006
0.0012
0.005
0.001
0.004
0.0008

Hazard rate
Hazard rate

0.003
0.0006
0.002
0.0004
0.001
0.0002
0
0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Time Time
Effective Hazard Rate as a function of mixed population

0.002 0.0045
0.0018 p1 p2 0.004 p1 p2
0.0016 0.0035
0.8 0.2 0.2 0.8
0.0014
0.003
Hazard rate

Hazard rate
0.0012
0.0025
0.001
0.002
0.0008
0.0006 0.0015
0.0004 0.001
0.0002 0.0005
0 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Time Time

p1 = proportion of strong population


p2 = proportion of weak population
Conditional Reliability function: Homework

Consider a component drawn at random from a mixed population composed of 2 types of failure

subpopulations with same Shape factor, b = 3 and h1 = 1000 hr given that the component is from

subpopulation 1, and h2 = 500 hr given that the component is from subpopulation 2. Proportion

of type 1 and type 2 population components are 0.8 and 0.2 respectively.

Plot the hazard rate and conditional reliability function.

How will the functions look like if the proportions become 0.2 and 0.8 respectively? Plot from 100

to 2000 hr with 500 hr interval.


Effective Hazard Rate as a function of multiple failure mode

Each failure mode has its own


distribution and hence its own
hazard rate.
The observed hazard rate is a
consequence of hazard rate
functions of all failure modes.
QA

You might also like