Youth Policy Development in India
Youth Policy Development in India
net/publication/351450124
CITATION READS
1 1,317
1 author:
Casimir Raj.M
DON BOSCO ANBU ILLAM
37 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Casimir Raj.M on 10 May 2021.
Foundotions of
Youth Development
b?
ABc
ffi #
iffi*
)=l-
re
II
Rajiv Gandhi National lnstitute of
Youth Development
Rajiv Gandhi National lnstitute of PGDYD OO1
Youth Development FOUNDATIONS OF
YOI.]'[H DEVELOPMENT
Block
_Course Written by
Writer
Introduction
,rOa^r,nOt ra"
DT. DEVENDIRAN
Associate Professor UNIT-I. Defining youth: Social C;;;;tr_,
Dept. of Social Work Youth "f
Central Universitv
Mizoram
MARY LIYA K. A.
Research Scholar, School of Counsellins UNIT-II. Value Base for youth D"r"l,rp*."t
Human Services and Social Work
University of Auckland
NewZealand.
Ms. SANGEETHA
'Student Counsellor UNIT-II. PsychologicalNeeds,ConcernsuoAf
*------
St. Joseph's Mar. Hr. Sec. School and problems of youth
Chennai
Dr. ALBIN -
Asst. Professor UNIT-III. Educational, Crlturul *JE"hrfl,ofrJ-
Dept. of Social Work Needs, Concerns and Issues anJ proUtems
Assam University of Youth
Silchar
- 78801 l, Assam
BLOCK3:OppORTUNITTEffi
OF YOUTH
DR. L. KATHIRESAN
Asst. Professor UNIT-I. Education and Skill O.*too_*r--
Dept. of Social Work Opportunities and Challen!". oi Voutt
Assam Universitv
Silchar -
78801I, Assam
DR. ROBERT CLIVE
Associate Professor UNIT-II. Employability *a g-otorrn*f--_
Dept. of Social Sciences Opportunities and Chilteng", of youth
Crossland Collese
Brahmavar- 57 6il
3, Karnataka
DR. JONAS RICHARD
Asst. Prof & Head UNIT-III. Health- physical, .rrtut,
Dept. of Social Work "-otiorutlrrJ
Social weltiein!: opp"ri""iii",
*o
Kritu Jeyanthi Collese Challenges of youth
Bangalore
DR. AMALA JEYA RAYAN
Principal UNIT-IV Citizenship and Civic U"gug".*t -
Don Bosco Arts& Science College Opportunities and Chalelgls oi
%rtr,
Keel Eral, Tuticorin Dt
)F BLOCK 4: VARIOUS POLICIES FOR YOUTH
{T DEYELOPMENT
/DR. CASIMIR RAJ UNIT-I. Genesis of Youth Policy in India
/ Lecturer, Paster Lenssen,
Polytechnic College, Kuthenkuly,
Tirunelveli Dt.
Coordinators
[Link] Mahadevan [Link] Botcha
Adjunct Professor Assistant Professor
Head, Department of Social Work Department of Social Work
RGNIYD, Tamil Nadu-602 105 RGNIYD, Tamil Nadu-602 105
June,2016
All rights reserved. No part of this work maybe reproduced in any form, by mimeography or any other
means, without permission in writing from the Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development.
Further information on the Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development courses may be
obtained from the Institute Office at Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu - 602 105.
ation,
I.1 INTRODUCTION
Young people today live in a globalised society characterised by a wide array of
prospects and problems, innovations and challenges, promise and despair. They
are confronted with unprecedented progt'ess in connectivity and communication
brought about by the Internet revolution, globalisation, new ideologies, multi-
cultural and multi-ethnic exchanges between countries and within public and
private sector institutions. Young people are a vulnerable global majority that
are influenced by these rapid developments. Their life situations and lifestyles are
deeply affected by the various demographic, economic and social changes in the
dominant society (Motcham, 2014).
The present demographic, political, ideological, economic and social changes
around the globe affect the life situation, wellbeing and lifestyles of young people
in every country. They live in a prolonged and complex period of transition
79
slittemt
Young people need to cope wth
from childhood to youth and to adulthood' status,
urd ,rrr".rtuiity ouit the suitability of
Foundations of Youth tht
DeveloPment longer period or Rnanciat dependency not only with I|SCA
choice;;^;il;" to wLether it will provide th-em
r
occupational throe ir
incomebutalsoruusociatrecognitionasanadultmemberofsociety(Biggartal young peopl While
[Link]"v ir u tool [Link]
walther, 2006,p.41). eb;;nv,"Vo"tt
is assured by different welfare stat
.i, *"[Link]"organisationi' lirhric,
issues and needs It is often stated tl
"r"';;;;Jit
international, independent and voluntary
Sccon,
in ttre lublicpolicy sphere. often,
becat is a ri,
young people,s [Link]. * overtooked the top youth
or opinions ofyouth never reach
their voices are not heard the concerns t() cns
it e-pofltical agenda (United Nations' 2004)' rtcl ior
of present-day youth and youth poli
A greater knowledge and understanding practitioners Acctlt
researchers' policy makers'
are of paramount tmfo'tu'"" for clllp()
;;..t who work for and with young people' ('tlstll'
tlclivt
Check Your Progress - I:
[Link]? :
Irt it t
ir llil
y()ul
F YOUTH POLI clcn'
I.2 THE PUR
[Link],[Link]
iffi"g iil *t9:i:1::T,Y::':l:1;f,*:1
of todav,
a
l:H^tffi:ril"or*;rr-u"".pt.a u. r
increasingly r""og,'i'Ji *'
t'v t*to: Tq i1-foi:;::ll tlT:?1;:,|,oJ"'"TX:?
e*rri, io05: 5) A nationar vouth poli
a
rfffi'Hi:;ffi:xTifrilfi?J' ;&u;;" a
io .rrrrr" tirat they have a national youth policy and an accompanying plan of
action.
According to ESCAP (l9gg, p. 5), a successful national youth policy should
.*po*"r,-"nable and youth, maximise their participation in society-and
".r"orrrug. concerned with its
ensure stronger coordination between the various organisations
delivery. rne BsceP (1999, p. 10) outlines the beneflts of a national youth policy:
. It fosters a stronger spirit of cooperation between young and old;
. It creates common goals for youth, the government, NGOs and the private
sector;
' It provides a way to plan for the future of youth;
. It raises the profile of youth as an important group within society;
In a similar vein, UNESCO (2005, p. 5) states that when there is an effort
to formulate
to its
a national youth policy, it serves as a symbol of that society's commitment
young citizens. A successful policy-formulation process comprises the following
elements:
. The allocation of adequate resources (time, human resources and budget);
o d strong partnership between key stakeholders;
. The active participation of young people at all stages of the formulation pro-
cess;
. The coupling of national youth policies with action plans;
. The mainstreaming of youth policies in the policy environment
(UNESCO,
2005, p. 5).
Youth policies are more likely to be successful if youth issues are well integrated
p' 35)'
into niional planning and implementation mechanisms. Williamson(2002,
who has ptayid a ceritral role in the international youth policy review
process of
the Council of Europe, has argued that there are five component features
to youth
o'the
policy, which can be labelled [Link] C's":
. Coverage (geographical area and social groups that are covered, plus policy
doinains);
. capacity (the role and relationship of government and youth NGOs);
. competence (the question of training and Qualifications);
. Co-operation, co-ordination and coherence (hierarchically and horizontally);
. Cost (the financial and human resources required)'
8l
Foundations of Youth
Development
A National youth Board was established in 1969 and the Board suggested the
setting up of a state advisory board on youth in each state and a district youth
board in each district. This was the beginning of an organisational set-up within
the union government to cater for the exclusive needs of the youth population and
to safeguard and promote youth interests in the national plans and programmes
(Saraswathi, 2008, p. 56-58).
There are several programmes funded by the Planning Commission, included in the
Five Year Plans for the welfare and development of youth in India. The First Five
Year Plan (1951-1956) aimed at co-ordinating all the existing youth services atthat
time such as the Scouts'and Guides'organisation, the NCC, the students'unions,
sports and athletic associations in or outside the colleges, dramatic clubs, and so
on (Madan , 2007 , p. 132). The perspective on youth and youth services underwent
changes in the successive plans of the 1970s and the 1980s. The Fifth Five Year
Plan (1975-79) stated the wealth of the community resources but included reference
to intellectual and cultural heritage and stressed that young people from all
backgrounds should get a proper share of this wealth (Planning Commission,1975;
Saraswathi, 2008, p. 60). The Sixth Five Year Plan (1980-85) described youth as a
'vast human resource which is characterised by idealism, zeal, active habits, positive
attitude towards service to others, an urge to be self-reliant and a willingness to
explore newer and non-conformist approaches to societal problems' (ibi[.
82
'Ihe Sixth Plan (1980-85) recognised the need for a national youth policy Genesisof YouthPolicyinlndia
1fua1
would integrate the work of relevant departments for effective implementation of
programmes. The guiding principles adopted in this regard were:
l. To provide greater equality of opportunity to all among the youth;
2. To liberate their talent which is now lost to the society;
3. To ensure a higher average level of relevant basic skills and education through
; work and service;
rh
)r
4. To enable a smooth transition of the youth from childhood through adolescence
to adulthood, as well as from the school to the world of work and service;
f,r
1e 5. To channelize their energies, idealism and healthy aspirations towards
rh development task, projects and programmes (Saraswathi, 2008, p. 6l).
n, 'Ihe Seventh Five Year Plan (1985-90) envisaged
development of human resources
ts
in all development programmes and qualitative improvement of education, skill
formation, and health status (Planning commission, 1985; Saraswathi, 2008, p.
:d 62). As apart of the re-structuring programme on 20th August 1986, India's young
al Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi announced 'twenty points on youth development
and participation'which were integrated in the Seventh Five Year Plan (Chowdhry,
1988, p. 156).
)r
:o The Ninth Five Year Plan (1997-2002) emphasised the importance of 'youth power'
v; (Yuva Shakti) and the need to promote this resource in nation-building (Planning
-o commission, 1997). The Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007) recognised the very
special needs of adolescents and the importance of providing them with the right
stimulus, role models and environment so that they could grow as assets to the
ts
nation. These developments are reflected in the National Youth Policy adopted in
rf
2003 (Planning Commission, 1997).
rg
IE
Check Your Progress - III:
rf
,d l. Describe in brief the development of youth policy?
h
n
d
rt
2014
S, The bovernment of India, stating that it valued the importance and the
o resourcefulness of the youth population, formulated the National youth
rt Policy (NYP) in 1988. This initiative was also prompted by the United Nations
rr International Year of Youth in 1985. The central theme of the policy was the
ie promotion of 'personality and functional capability'of the youth.
ll
As the first policy, it addressed the youth population in general to equip them to
;.
meet their obligations adequately and to give them their due share in the country's
a
life and progress. The objectives then were to instil in the youth awareness and
e
respect for the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution and willingness to
o
further the rule of law, national integration, non-violence, secularism and socialism;
to promote awareness of the rich cultural heritage of the nation; to develop in the
83
]llundrllonr of Youth
l)evelopment
youth qualities like discipling self-reliance, justice and fair play; and
maximum access to education (Saraswathi, 200g, p.67).
to a5;
The NYP 1988 also aimed to implement programmes for the removal | *.n.,
unemployment, rural and urban, educated and non-educated. It also planned It'u,r.
a committee on National youth programmes (coNyp) .to bring together l.t. Ir
various representatives of concerned ministrieg departments and national 1,,,o.
5
organisations, to advise the Ministry of youth Affairs and sports in discha
its duties in the effective implementation of the National youth policy,. H
lnrita
it failed to execute its objectives, primarily because of the weak implemer leE
strategy (Sivakumar, 2012, p.38). lclvrc
In 1993, the Government of India established the Rajiv Gandhi National Ins I unu".
of Youth Development (RGNIyD) as an apex information and research c Is. su
on youth development issues. Though Nyp 2003 spelled out an impler [Link].
mechanism more clearly than the r988 policy, there were still problems
in 1,,,.
through on the actions (Sivakumar, 2012, p.3g). The rwp zooE focused on
needs of those aged 13-35, but recognised adolescents (aged 13-19)
group requiring a different approach from that of young adults (aged
as a sp€ L*,
'l'lrc
zvis). N
recognised, moreover, the need for a multi-dimensional and integrated
approacl with su
serving youth needs and contained wide-ranging objectives.
l ndex,
llrrgets
Strciall'
bclongi
tlrtlp-or
r I istrict
Check Your Progress - IV:
.lirrnmu
1. Write a short note on different youth policies in India? liom cl
li'om st
Iurzardr
includir
youth i;
correcti
Youth
kceping
il
Check Your Progress - V:
in brief the essential features of NYP 2014?
I
,]
1. Describe
t
e?:1illilH?;#ii'"**i:i;il*:,111#::fr
svstem i{9
based welfare errcfam i-+^ a^ ..^-^ r^,-
more dependent ?"'"?i#J::3;l#fl.".ffi
and individualisil;:};ffi}?;
ilt:
in India is part of social poricy wtrictr is dynamic ano ctranges according to the
socio-economic situation of the country.
After independencq the following organisations were
involved in various youth
welfare activities: the Scouts'und c.,Id.r'organisation,
the NCC, the students,
IJnions, sports and athretic associations,
dramatic clubs, etc. At present, the
87
Foundations of Youth government implements the youth policy through RGNIYD, NYKS, NSSS and
Development NGOs. It is evident that industrialisation, interest groups, institutions, different I tf
ideologies and different international agencies have greatly influenced and shaped {N;r
Indian youth policy. Though the government takes an integrated approach to llr';t
address the needs of the young people, a lot more needs to be done. Illiteracy ,rtttl
among youth, unemployment, and health issues are yet to be addressed fully and
comprehensively. As it is evidenced with only 5 states and I union territory in the
country have an explicit youth policy in place (Motcham, 2011, p. 50).
5. Ministry of Youth Affairs and sports (2003) National youth policy 2003, New .).()
Delhi:Government of India.
2.0
6. Planning commission - Five Year Plans of l, 5,6,7 and 9th Five year plans,
New Delhi, Government of India l ltr.:
lx)p
I lrc
ISSUr
[Link]. Ra! gotcham, Assistant Professor, Don Bosco College of Arts & r'vltl
Science, Department of Environmental Science & Value Based Education, Keela r lc:vt
Eral, Thoothukudi.
l'"
2.1
I ndi
Irh
Indr
11()\t
rep(
(623
(Cer
poli
acti,
dete
agc
toa
dict
apl
grol
this
88