0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views8 pages

US-China Trade War: Economic Impact Analysis

Uploaded by

rthread12
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views8 pages

US-China Trade War: Economic Impact Analysis

Uploaded by

rthread12
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Francis Gabriel S.

Hipolito 02/12/2021

Alexandra Faith F. Layug BSME-1C

A trade war is known to be an economic conflict caused by extreme

protectionism in which states raise or create tariffs or other trade factors against a

rivalling party in response to trade barriers. On Monday, 4th of October, it has been

reported once again that two countries, USA and China, have been involve in such

economic fracture. China’s abrupt growth was noted in the early 1978, and has been

known to manufacture a lot of items, equipment, and many more to be distributed and

sold into different countries all across the globe. Where in the USA is deemed to be the

top 1 global economic contributor, making both countries earn the spotlight in the world

of economy.

Unfair business practices that harm a country's markets are often at the root of

trade conflicts, according to experts. A trade barrier, such as a tax on an important

product imported from another nation, may be imposed in an effort to safeguard

domestic industry or generate employment. This tit-for-tat conflict might turn into a trade

war if the other nation responds in kind. The US thinks that China is playing unfair

business in order to shovel up their economy. Anywhere in the world, China is known

for being a copycat nation. Chinese companies have a reputation for ripping off Western

products and modifying them to fit the Chinese market. To further their business model,

they have a name for it called "Shanzhai," which means making counterfeit or pirated
goods. According to Marine (2015), Chinese company Xiaomi has just launched the 399

(roughly $64) Yi Action Camera, which looks like a budget version of the $130 GoPro

HERO, which is a US product, but with better specs. However, the Yi's Sony 16MP

sensor is able to shoot at 120 frames per second at 1080P and 60 frames per second at

720P, whereas the HERO can only shoot at 30 frames per second. This kind of

scenario is an example of how China tries to rip off the US. There are a lot of products

that are being modified in China, and that is the reason why the US government went

ablaze and started the trade wars. US tariffs on a few major import items–washing

machines, solar panels, steel and aluminium–were raised in the early months of 2018.

However, it soon became clear that US trade policies were aimed at China despite

these tariffs' non-discriminatory nature. Between 2018 and 2019, the United States

increased tariffs on thousands of Chinese products, resulting in a total of $350 billion in

imports from China. Over the course of several rounds of tariffs, China targeted about

$100 billion worth of US exports in retaliation.

As of 2021, the tariffs that were in place when the agreement was signed in

January 2020 were still in effect. While tariff reductions have long been a hallmark of the

United States' global leadership in global trade policymaking, this trade war represents

a dramatic shift from that role.

Both sides suffered economic losses as a result of the trade war, which diverted

trade flows away from both China and the United States. According to Heather Long of
the Washington Post, "U.S. Economic growth has slowed, business investment has

stalled, and businesses have not hired as many people. Across the country, many

farmers have gone bankrupt, and the manufacturing and freight transportation sectors

have reached lows not seen since the previous recession. Trump's actions amounted to

one of the most significant tax increases in recent memory." According to a September

2019 Moody's Analytics study, the trade war has already cost the US economy nearly

300,000 jobs and an estimated 0.3 percent of real GDP. Other studies estimate that the

cost to the U.S. GDP is expected to be around 0.7%. Bloomberg Economics estimated

in 2019 that the trade war would cost the US economy $316 billion by the end of 2020,

while more recent research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Columbia

University found that tariffs imposed by the US on Chinese imports cost U.S. companies

at least $1.7 trillion in stock price losses. Numerous studies have found that US

companies primarily paid for US tariffs, with a total cost estimated at nearly $46 billion.

Tariffs compelled American businesses to accept lower profit margins, reduce wages

and job opportunities for American workers, postpone potential wage increases or

expansions, and raise prices for American consumers or businesses. According to an

American Farm Bureau spokesperson, "farmers have lost the vast majority of what was

once a $24 billion market in China" as a result of Chinese retaliation.

Meanwhile, the United States' goods trade deficit, China continued to rise,

reaching a new high of $419.2 billion in 2018. The trade deficit had shrunk to $345

billion by 2019, roughly the same level as in 2016, owing largely to reduced trade flows.

It should be noted that, while the United States' trade deficit with China decreased, the
country's overall trade deficit did not. Trump's unilateral tariffs on China diverted trade

flows away from China, increasing the US trade deficit with Europe, Mexico, Japan,

South Korea, and Taiwan. The trade war caused China economic pain, but not enough

for it to cave in to the Trump administration's core demands for major structural reform.

Indeed, as the trade war dragged on, Beijing reduced tariffs for its other trading partners

in an effort to reduce its reliance on US markets. Both parties announced the final

agreement on January 15, 2020, which largely mirrored Beijing's initial offer —

increased goods purchases plus commitments on improved intellectual property

protection, currency, and forced technology transfer.

Because of this, it's important to realize that the United States and China do not

trade in a vacuum. A global economy is a web of countries where purchased goods are

made and sold before they reach their final destinations in different countries. Many

other countries, products, and businesses will likely be affected by the U.S. decision to

impose tariffs on China as a major manufacturing hub.

According to Peterson Institute for International Economics research, 87 percent

of the products that will be affected by the tariffs are supplied by non-Chinese

corporations operating in China, while only 13 percent are supplied by Chinese

companies. To target one country or one industry is nearly impossible in our global,

interconnected economy, and may even affect some of our closest allies.
The tariffs imposed by the Trump administration could have a greater impact on

American businesses than those targeted in China. For every dollar spent on a "Made in

China" product, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco calculated in 2011 that 55

cents went to services produced in the United States. 6 Increasing tariffs and starting

trade wars in a global economy may have unintended consequences for the U.S.

economy.

The impact of Trump's trade war with China on American consumers will not be

felt for some time, but it will eventually. There's a safety net in the form of a buffer.

Because of new tariffs, companies have to pass the increased costs on to consumers.

Cost increases in business take time to trickle down into retail prices. Prices are likely to

rise, but it won't happen all at once.

According to Hsu (2021) The U.S.-China trade war is continuing. Donald Trump's

presidency began with an investigation into China's unfair trade practices and the

slapping of 25% tariffs. Those tariffs are still in place four years later. At an ornate

signing ceremony at the White House involving President Trump and Chinese Vice

Premier Li Hè, the two sides declared a trade truce. Although the full text of the

agreement has not been made public, reports indicate that it commits China to

purchasing an additional $200 billion in American goods over the next two years,

compared to 2017. The agreement's text, which has been made public, shows China

pledging to protect American intellectual property, stop coercive technology transfers,


and refrain from using currency devaluation as a trade weapon. It also included an

enforcement mechanism that would allow import tariffs to be imposed if disputes were

not resolved. In other words, Beijing effectively paid for the deal with the promise of a

windfall in American goods purchases. President Trump appears to have accepted an

IOU as a declaration of victory.

Time will tell whether the innovations in the agreement on enforcement succeed

where others have failed, and much will depend on China's willingness to translate

agreements into law and, more importantly, enforce them. However, the key question

for the United States — especially now, when the US economy is in the worst shape

since the Great Depression as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic — is whether the

economic costs paid for those enforcement agreements were worth the billions of

dollars lost in value, hundreds of thousands of jobs lost, stagnation of US

manufacturing, and devastating effects of the trade war on American farmers.

Finally, the phase one agreement disappointed because, together with the trade

war, it severely harmed the US economy while failing to make significant progress in

fundamentally resolving the structural imbalances in the US-China trade relationship.

The consequences may not be felt as of now, but it will deal a huge blow later on as

time goes by.


DOCUMENTATIONS
REFERENCES

- [Link]

price-cost

- [Link]

- [Link]

gain-how-the-us-china-trade-war-hurt-america/

- [Link]

for-us-china-trade-war

Common questions

Powered by AI

The U.S. maintained high tariffs on Chinese imports as part of a strategy to pressure China into altering its trade practices, particularly concerning intellectual property and market access issues . By imposing tariffs, the U.S. aimed to create a leverage point, encouraging China to negotiate more favorable terms for the U.S. The tariffs were also intended to support domestic industries by leveling the playing field against what were perceived as unfair advantages held by Chinese companies . Despite the tariffs' adverse effects on the U.S. economy, such as increased consumer prices and job losses, they were seen as a necessary tool to achieve broader strategic goals, including addressing trade imbalances and ensuring fair competition .

The U.S.-China trade war has long-term implications for global supply chains by catalyzing shifts and diversification efforts. Companies have been seeking to minimize reliance on any single country, especially China, by spreading manufacturing and production across various regions to mitigate risks of future trade disruptions . This process, often called 'decoupling,' impacts global trade logistics, cost structures, and supply chain integration. Furthermore, China's strategic lowering of tariffs for other trade partners outside the U.S. suggests an intent to realign itself with allies, potentially fostering new trade blocs while challenging the previous dependence on the American market . These shifts could lead to sustained changes in how global trade networks operate .

In response to the U.S. tariffs, China strategically reduced tariffs for its non-U.S. trading partners. This approach aimed to diversify its trade relationships and decrease its economic reliance on the U.S. market . The strategic rationale included strengthening ties with other economies, ensuring stable trade flows, and leveraging these relations to offset the negative impact of the American tariffs . By improving terms with other partners, China sought to secure alternative markets for its goods, thus buffering its economy against U.S. trade policies .

Intellectual property (IP) concerns were central to the U.S.-China trade dispute, with the U.S. accusing China of inadequate protection and enforcement of IP rights, technology theft, and coercive technology transfers . The Phase One agreement attempted to address these concerns by committing China to enhance IP protections and stop forced technology transfers . However, the effectiveness of these measures remains questionable, as it depends on China's willingness and ability to implement and enforce such commitments . Critics argue that while promises were made, the deal lacks detailed enforcement mechanisms and does not guarantee substantive changes in China's IP practices . Overall, while a step in the right direction, the measures proposed may not fully resolve the deep-seated IP issues .

The U.S. tariffs caused significant disruptions in global trade patterns. They diverted trade flows away from China, unintentionally increasing the U.S. trade deficit with other regions, including Europe, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan . The interconnected nature of the global economy meant that targeting specific countries was challenging since a considerable proportion of affected products were supplied by non-Chinese companies operating in China . Furthermore, China's response involved reducing tariffs for non-U.S. trading partners to lessen its dependency on U.S. markets, thereby reshaping global trade alignments .

The trade war resulted in several unintended economic consequences for American consumers and businesses. Tariffs levied on Chinese imports increased costs for U.S. companies, who then had to either absorb these costs by reducing profit margins or pass them onto consumers as higher prices . The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found that a significant portion of spending on 'Made in China' goods went to services in the U.S., indicating the tariffs could inadvertently harm American businesses more than their intended Chinese targets . Additionally, the trade war contributed to economic uncertainty, leading to postponed business investments and expansions .

The United States initiated the trade war due to concerns over unfair business practices and protection of its domestic industries. The U.S. viewed China's business model, particularly practices like 'Shanzhai' – the imitation and modification of Western products – as harmful to its markets. An example cited is Xiaomi's Yi Action Camera, which resembles the GoPro HERO but with superior specifications, at a lower price, illustrating China's strategy of undercutting U.S. businesses . The U.S. also accused China of intellectual property theft and coercive technology transfer . These practices contributed to the perception of unfairness and prompted the U.S. to increase tariffs on Chinese goods .

The Phase One agreement aimed to address structural imbalances by increasing China's purchases of American goods by $200 billion over two years and improving protections for American intellectual property . While the agreement signaled a temporary truce, it failed to make significant progress on fundamental issues such as coercive technology transfer and trade imbalances. The deal was largely seen as Beijing purchasing goods to ease tensions, without addressing deeper issues . Its enforcement mechanism was another area of concern, as it relied heavily on China's willingness to follow through on commitments, which remained uncertain . Overall, while the agreement provided short-term economic relief, it did not resolve the underlying trade conflicts .

The trade war significantly affected American economic sectors. Manufacturing and freight transportation sectors faced downturns, reaching historic lows, while business investments stalled . Farmers suffered considerably as they lost a substantial portion of the Chinese market, previously valued at $24 billion, due to Chinese retaliatory tariffs . The economic slowdown resulted in nearly 300,000 job losses and an estimated 0.3% reduction in real GDP, with some studies suggesting the GDP impact could be as high as 0.7% . Additionally, U.S. companies faced increased costs due to tariffs, which led to lower profit margins and higher consumer prices .

The U.S.-China trade war affected the United States' overall trade deficit and economic growth in multiple ways. Contrary to the intended goal of reducing the trade deficit with China, the trade war resulted in a temporary decrease followed by shifts in trade flows, diverting imports to other countries, thereby increasing the U.S. trade deficit with regions like Europe and Mexico . The broader impact saw economic growth slowing down, with a near 300,000 job loss, business investments stalling, and sectors like manufacturing hitting recession-era lows due to uncertainty and increased costs . Studies estimated the trade war could reduce U.S. GDP by around 0.7%, reflecting significant economic damage with limited success in achieving a better trade balance .

You might also like