0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views31 pages

Traffic Management Report for 3 Abbott Road

The Traffic Management Report for 3 Abbott Road, Artarmon, NSW, prepared by Loka Consulting Engineers, outlines the existing conditions, proposed development, and traffic management strategies for a residential flat building with 12 units. It includes assessments of car parking provisions, driveway designs, and traffic flow data, indicating compliance with relevant Australian standards. The report aims to identify the impacts of the development on the local street network and propose mitigation measures.

Uploaded by

Amir Whed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views31 pages

Traffic Management Report for 3 Abbott Road

The Traffic Management Report for 3 Abbott Road, Artarmon, NSW, prepared by Loka Consulting Engineers, outlines the existing conditions, proposed development, and traffic management strategies for a residential flat building with 12 units. It includes assessments of car parking provisions, driveway designs, and traffic flow data, indicating compliance with relevant Australian standards. The report aims to identify the impacts of the development on the local street network and propose mitigation measures.

Uploaded by

Amir Whed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Job Number: 21NL243-T1 Date: 20th December, 2022

Traffic Management Report for


3 Abbott Road, Artarmon, NSW

Prepared by

LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS PTY LTD

Nermein Loka

BSC, ME, MIE(AUST), CPEng, NPER, RPEQ

Senior Civil Engineer

Director
Table of Contents

1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3
2. Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................ 4
2.1. Existing Development..................................................................................................... 4
2.2. Public Transportations.................................................................................................... 4
2.3. Existing Road Conditions ............................................................................................... 6
3. Proposed Development ......................................................................................................... 7
4. Off Street Car Parking Provision ............................................................................................ 7
4.1. Car parking .................................................................................................................... 7
4.2. Bicycle Parking............................................................................................................... 8
5. Car Park and Driveway Layout .............................................................................................. 8
5.1. Driveway and Ramp Design ........................................................................................... 8
5.2. Dimensions of Parking Spaces ....................................................................................... 9
6. Traffic Flows and Volumes .................................................................................................. 11
6.1. Daily Traffic Data .......................................................................................................... 11
6.2. Traffic Survey ............................................................................................................... 12
6.3. Existing Road Service Level ......................................................................................... 13
6.4. Intersection Assessment .............................................................................................. 15
7. Traffic Generation................................................................................................................ 16
8. Swept Path Analysis ............................................................................................................ 20
9. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 20
Appendix A Architectural Plan ………………………………………………………………………….21
Appendix B Sidra Intersection Analysis…………………………………………………………………23
Appendix C Swept Path Analysis …………………...…………………………………………………27
1. Introduction

Loka Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd has been engaged by Kennedy Associates Architects to provide
a Traffic Management Plan for the site at 3 Abbott Road, Artarmon, NSW (refer to Figure 1-1 and
Figure 1-2) within Willoughby City Council for D.A. stage.

A Traffic Management Plan and Report is required for the proposed development to identify the
impacts of the proposal on the local street network and mitigation measures required to ameliorate
any impacts. This includes:

• A description of the site and details of the development proposal;


• A review of the road network in the vicinity of the site, and traffic conditions on that road
network;
• A review of the geometric design features of the proposed car parking facilities for
compliance with the relevant codes and standards; and
• An assessment of the adequacy and suitability of the quantum of off-street car parking
provided on site.

Figure 1-1 Subject site (from SIX maps)


Figure 1-2 Site location (from SIX maps)

2. Existing Conditions

[Link] Development

The current site is approximately 1538.7 m2 and it has one existing vacant childcare centre with
two driveways entry and exit from Abbott Road.

[Link] Transportations

The area is connected to public transport, with bus and train stations located in close proximity to
the site.

1. It takes 3 minutes walking (220m) from the site to Hampden Rd at Jersey Rd bus stop (refer
to Figure 2-1).
2. It takes 4 minutes walking (350m) from the site to Artarmon Station train stop (refer to Figure
2-2).
Table 2-1 shows the bus and train line names; routes and the time between two successive trips.
Refer to Transport NSW for accurate details.
Stop Line Route Weekday Weekday Weekend Weekend
No. Name hours interval hours interval
N90 City Town Hall to Hornsby 01:54- 60 min 01:54- 60 min
1 via Chatswood 04:54 04:54
N91 Bondi Junction to 01:23- 50 min 01:23- 50 min
Macquarie Park via City 05:13 05:13
Town Hall (Night Service)
T1 Berowra to City via 04:30- 10 min 04:30- 10 min
2 Gordon 00:53 00:38
T9 Hornsby to North Shore 05:17- 15 min 05:24- 15 min
via City 01:27 01:37
Table 2-1 Bus and train line, route, and time

Figure 2-1 Site to Hampden Rd at Jersey Rd bus stop (Source Google maps)
Figure 2-2 Site to Artarmon Station train stop (Source Google maps)

2.3. Existing Road Conditions

The proposed development is bounded by:

• Hampden Lane on the East


• Abbott Road on the West
• No. 2-4 Jersey Rd on the North
• No. 3-11 McMillan Rd on the South.

There is one proposed vehicular crossing to the site from Abbott Road

Abbott Road
Abbott Road is a local road and not classified by Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW).

Abbott Road is approximately 9 metres wide with kerbs and gutters on both sides. it provides
linkage from McMillan Road to Jersey Road. It has an undivided travel lane in one direction with
kerbside parking on both sides.

Jersey Road
Jersey Road is a local road and not classified by TfNSW.

Jersey Road is approximately 12 metres wide with kerbs and gutters on both sides. It has a divided
travel lane in for both directions with total 4 lanes and kerbside parking on both sides.
McMillan Road
McMillan Road is a local road and not classified by TfNSW.

McMillan Road is approximately 9 metres wide with kerbs and gutters on both sides. It has an
undivided travel lane in one direction with kerbside parking on both sides.

3. Proposed Development

The proposed development will facilitate the construction of a residential flat building development
consisting of one basement level primarily for car parking with entry from Abbott Road, ground floor
level and 2 upper levels with a total of 12 units.

4. Off Street Car Parking Provision

4.1. Car parking

The subject development is proposed to be under Affordable Rental Housing SEPP 2021. Since
the development is proposed by a social housing provider, the car parking requirement and
summary are shown in Table 4-1 to 4-3.

Land use Minimum number of car parking spaces

(i) for each dwelling containing 1 bedroom—at least 0.4


parking spaces, or
Medium density
(ii) for each dwelling containing 2 bedrooms—at least 0.5
residential flat
parking spaces, or
buildings
(iii) for each dwelling containing at least 3 bedrooms— at
least 1 parking space,
Table 4-1 Off-street car parking space provision rate

Units and bedrooms provided are summarized in Table 3-2.

Bedroom Number of units


2-bed 9
3-bed 3
Total 12
Table4-2 Bedroom summary

Required minimum parking spaces for the proposed development is shown in Table 3-3.

Parking Unit Parking Required


Amount Required Proposed
type type rate spaces
2-bed 9 0.5 4.5
Residential 8 8
3-bed 3 1 3
Table 4-3 Required minimum car parking spaces

It’s provided 8 residential parking spaces including 3 accessible parking spaces and 3 LHA gold
parking spaces.
The design complies with the requirement from SEPP (2021).

The architectural plan of the proposed development has been prepared Kennedy Associates
Architects and is attached in Appendix A.

4.2. Bicycle Parking

There are 4 bicycle spaces provided at basement level.

5. Car Park and Driveway Layout

[Link] and Ramp Design

The design of the driveway, internal roadways & ramps, and car parking spaces must comply with
Australian Standards; details are shown in the ground floor architectural plan. Table 5-1 and Table
5-2 assess the compliance of the site to Australian Standard.

Table 5-1 Driveway and ramp design

FEATURE AS 2890.1 Architectural Plan Compliance

Driveway width • 3.0 to 5.5 for Category The design is


1. 6.1m two-way entry complied with AS
• 6.0 to 9.0 for Category between two kerbs 2890.1
2.

Ramp grade Longer than 20m – 1:5 Flat grade @ 2.5m The design is
maximum. 5% @ 7.1m complied with AS
Up to 20m long – 1:4 Flat grade @ 5.4m 2890.1
maximum.

Transition grade no
more than 1:8.

First 6m no more than


1:20.

Changes of grade no
more than 1:8.

Internal • One-way – 3.0m One way in the ramp: The design is


Driveway/Ramp minimum between 4.45m complied with AS
width kerbs 2890.1
• Two- way – 5.5m
minimum between
kerbs

Note: 300mm
clearance on both side
when there is a high
kerb or barrier on both
sides.
Headroom 2.2m min between the Head clearance with slab The design is
floor and an overhead thickness & mechanical complied with AS
obstruction. services is shown 4.12m 2890.1

Ensure min. 2.2m overall


and 2.5m at disabled
parking at CC stage

[Link] of Parking Spaces

The design of the car parking spaces should be in compliance with AS 2890.1.

Table 5-2 Dimensions of parking spaces

FEATURE AS/NZS 2890.1, Architectural Plan Compliance


2890.3 & 2890.6
Residential 5.4m x 3.0m 5.4m x 2.4m The design is
parking space complied with AS
2890.1
Accessible 5.4m x 2.4m 5.5m x 2.4m adjacent a 5.5m The design is
parking space adjacent a 5.4m x x 2.4m shared zone complied with AS
2.4m shared zone 2890.6
LHA(Gold) 5.4m X 3.2m 5.4m X 3.2m The design is
Parking space complied with
Livable Housing
Design Guidelines
Third Edition
Aisle width 5.8m minimum 5.8m The design is
complied with AS
2890.1
Blind aisle 1m extension Min 1m The design is
beyond last parking complied with AS
space 2890.1

Bicycle parking 1.2m x 0.5m vertical 1.2m x 0.5m The design is


space complied with AS
2890.3
Bicycle aisle width 1.5m 1.64m The design is
complied with AS
2890.3
Gradients within a 1:20 (5%) parallel to -2.5% @ 24m The design is
parking module the angle of complied with AS
parking. 2890.1
1:16 (6.25%) in any
other direction.
Parking envelope According to Complies with AS 2890.1 The design is
AS2890.1 Figure complied with AS
5.2 2890.1

As required in AS 2890.1:2004, a triangular area with 2.5m (face to driveway) by 2.0m (face to
street) will be kept clear of obstructions to visibility (Refer to Figure 4-1).
Figure 5-1 AS 2890.1:2004 requirement

In accordance with AS 2890.1:2004, sight triangle is hatched in red and shown in the following
Figure 5-2.

Figure 5-2 Sight triangle


Ensure any object within the sight triangle is max. 1.15m high or 50% transparent above 0.9m if
higher than 1.15m.

The sight triangle requirement complies with Australian Standard.

6. Traffic Flows and Volumes

[Link] Traffic Data

Road and Maritime Service (RMS) collect traffic volume information from roadside traffic collection
devices across the NSW network.

From RMS’s average daily traffic volume map the nearest traffic counting station is station ID 33023
at 70m South of Sunnyside Crescent, Castlecrag 2068 located approximately 3.6 km East North of
the subject site.

Subject Site

Figure 6-1 Traffic Count Station

From the counts undertaken at Station ID 33023 in 2022 average daily traffic account of 14,886
vehicles Northbound and 13,764 vehicles southbound were counted on average per day passing
across Eastern Valley Way.
[Link] Survey

Traffic Counts were undertaken during the morning and afternoon peak periods to gauge the
performance of the current road system.

Traffic Survey is performed by Trans Traffic Survey PTY LTD on Wednesday 7th of December,
2022 in the morning between 7:00am to 9:00am and in the afternoon between 4:00pm to 6:00pm
at two (2) locations:
• Connection at Abbott Rd. & McMillan Rd.
• T-junction at Abbott Rd. & Jersey Rd.

Figure 6-2 Locations of Traffic Survey

The full result of the traffic analysis is summarised in Figure 6-3 to 6-6 below.
Figure 6-3 Traffic Survey at Abbott Rd. - McMillan Rd. Wednesday

Figure 6-4 Traffic Survey at Abbott Rd. - Jersey Rd. Wednesday

[Link] Road Service Level

The capacity of the urban road is generally determined by the capacity of intersections. Table 4.3
and 4.4 of the RMS’s ‘Guide to Traffic Generating Developments’ provide guidance on mid-block
capacities for urban roads and likely levels of service. The tables are reproduced below.

Type of Road One-Way Mid-block Lane Capacity (pcu/hr)


Divided Road 1000
Median or inner lane
Undivided Road 900
With Adjacent Parking Lane 900
Outer or kerb lane Clearway Conditions 900
Occasional Parked Cars 600
Occasional Parked Cars 1500
4 lane undivided
Clearway Conditions 1800
4 lane divided Clearway Conditions 1900
Level of Service Two Lanes
One Lane (veh/hr)
(per direction) (veh/hr)

A 200 900
B 380 1400
C 600 1800
D 900 2200
E 1400 2800

Abbott Road

Based on the traffic analysis and roadside environment (occasional parked cars), it is considered
that Abbott Road operates within the mid-block capacity for an urban road with interrupted flow.
Abbott Road is currently functioning at a level of service B in peak hour conditions (at maximum
240 vehicles in one lane at peak hour).

The RMS guide states a service level B, ‘This level is in the zone of stable flow and drivers still
have reasonable freedom to select their desired speed and to manoeuvre within the traffic
stream, although the general level of comfort and convenience is little less than that of the level of
Service A.’

McMillan Road

Based on the traffic analysis and roadside environment (occasional parked cars), it is considered
that McMillan Road operates within the mid-block capacity for an urban road with interrupted flow.
McMillan Road is currently functioning at a level of service B in peak hour conditions (at maximum
244 vehicles in one lane at peak hour).

The RMS guide states a service level B, ‘This level is in the zone of stable flow and drivers still
have reasonable freedom to select their desired speed and to manoeuvre within the traffic
stream, although the general level of comfort and convenience is little less than that of the level of
Service A.’

Jersey Road

Based on the traffic analysis and roadside environment (occasional parked cars), it is considered
that Jersey Road operates within the mid-block capacity for an urban road with interrupted flow.
Jersey Road is currently functioning at a level of service A in peak hour conditions (at maximum
221 vehicles in two lane at peak hour).

The RMS guide states a service level A, ‘This, the top level is a condition of free flow in which
individual drivers are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom
to select desired speeds and to manoeuvre within the traffic stream is extremely high, and the
general level of comfort and convenience provided is excellent.’
[Link] Assessment

The existing intersection operating performance of the surveyed intersection for the weekday
morning and afternoon peak hours were assessed using the SIDRA software package (version 7.0)
to determine the Degree of Saturation (DS), Average Delay (AVD in seconds) and Level of Service
(LoS).

SIDRA program provides Level of Service Criteria Table as below.

The Average Vehicle Delay (AVD) provides a measure of the operational performance of an
intersection as indicated below, which relates AVD to LOS. The AVD’s should be taken as a guide
only as longer delays could be tolerated in some locations (i.e., inner city conditions) and on some
roads (i.e. minor side street intersecting with a major arterial route). For traffic signals, the average
delay over all movements should be taken. For roundabouts and priority control intersections (sign
control) the critical movement for level of service assessment should be that movement with the
highest average delay.

The degree of saturation (DS) is another measure of the operational performance of individual
intersections. For intersections controlled by traffic signals, both queue length and delay increase
rapidly as DS approaches 1. It is usual to attempt to keep DS to less than 0.9. Degrees of Saturation
in the order of 0.7 generally represent satisfactory intersection operation. When DS exceed 0.9
queues can be anticipated.

The full SIDRA outputs are presented in the Appendix B for the existing conditions as well as
proposed conditions.
7. Traffic Generation

An indication of the traffic generation potential of the development proposal is provided in


accordance with Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) publication ‘Guide to Traffic Generating
Developments 2002’.

RMS guidelines are based on an extensive survey of a wide range of land uses.
The existing site is a vacant childcare centre.
The subject site is residential (12 units in total)
Identified as medium density residential flat building.

Rates.
Smaller units and flats (up to two bedrooms):
Daily vehicle trips = 4-5 per dwelling
Weekday peak hour vehicle trips = 0.4-0.5 per dwelling.
Larger units and town houses (three or more bedrooms):
Daily vehicle trips = 5.0-6.5 per dwelling
Weekday peak hour vehicle trips = 0.5-0.65 per dwelling.

For the proposed development there are 12 small units in total. Therefore, there is a traffic
generation potential of approximately 6 vehicles per hour during peak periods.

Existing childcare centre is vacant

The future vehicle trips should be discounted by the existing trips to evaluate the net increase in
traffic generation due to the proposed development. This is shown in Table 5-1.

Time Land use Rate Work days

Future Residential 12 units 0.5 per unit +6.0

Vacant 1 existing
Existing - 0
Childcare

Net +6.0
Table 7-1 Traffic generation for future and existing development net Increase in peak hour

According to the Table above, it is likely that the proposed development will result in a change in
the traffic generation by approximately 6 additional vehicle trips/hr during weekday peak hour
from Monday to Friday.
+5 +1
+1
+3
+2

Figure 7-1 traffic generated by the proposed development at evening peak hour
(Assuming 80% of the residential traffic generation will exit the development at morning peak hour)
+1 +5
+5

+1

Figure 7-2 traffic generated by the proposed development at evening peak hour
(Assuming 80% of the residential traffic generation will enter the development at evening peak hour)
Figure 7- 3: level of service pre and post development at Abbott Road – McMillan Road in morning peak hours

Figure 7- 4: level of service pre and post development at Abbott Road – McMillan Road in evening peak hours

Figure 7- 5: level of service pre and post development at Abbott Road – McMillan Road in morning peak hours

Figure 7- 6: level of service pre and post development at Abbott Road – McMillan Road in morning peak hours
8. Swept Path Analysis

To ensure all vehicles enter and exit the site in a forward direction, swept path analysis has been
conducted in the Appendix C.

It is our opinion that the proposed car parking and driveway comply with Australia Standard.

9. Conclusion
This traffic impact assessment has been prepared in accordance with the requirement of the
RMS ‘Guide to Traffic Generating Developments’.

Traffic Generation by the development does not affect the level of service at all intersections.

The site is located within public bus and train transportation. This would minimize the need for
staff and visitors of the proposed development to drive their own vehicles to and from their
various activities.

The Traffic Management Report concludes that the proposed residential development is suitable
in relation to internal traffic according to AS2890 and is suitable for the subject location in relation
to the impact of traffic.
APPENDIX A
Architectural Plan

LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS PTY LTD


balcony above
2-4 Jersey Road
A three storey apartment building B C D
B D C

S
T1

HAM
H12

balcony
adjoining building setback 9.37m

exi

PDE
S
stin
gc
ont

N LA
our
860
ABBOTT ROAD

NE
balcony above

0 0
S
building above

exi
exi
st building above

st
ing

ate building setback


ing
con

exi
tou

con

ex 000

r
r

we
910

ist
87
ting

tou

se
00

ing

of
r 88
con

c
exis

on

on
T02 T03 ting

000

tou

loc S
tou

ati
H20 cont

r
H7 our

r 89

adjoining
T09 9000
T04 T05 T06 0 bin room

000

xim
DP 9774 H10 H19 H19 H19 T18

pro
boundary 71.654m 49°21' H15

ap

bou
T14 T15 E / 88600 E / 87748 E / 87355 T21 E / 86420 E / 85558

S
T10 T12

nda
T11 T13 E / 87096
H5 H5 H5 H5 H8
H5

ry 2
H5
boundary 20.115m 139°21'

.3
TPZ

95m
ADG side setback L00-03 SMH E / 85642 s
91000 ontour

2.03 sq m e
building above non habitable 3m lin

298°
t
igh
2 5.3% 2

S
s
front setback 7.435m
c

33'
existing

E / 86124
rampin RL / 85550
g abov
e bins E / 85475

rear setback 10.05m


building above bikes walkway max 1:20 E / 85497
ADG side setback
E / 87181 rise 245 E / 86259
E / 85533
L00-03 habitable 6m RL / 85795 RL / 85550

S
RL / 85550

sig E / 85627
ht E / 85671
pumpset s s s s TPZ lin
26.19 sq m
es
FFL / 85795
building above

room

building above
10.3%

existingSsewer to be diverted -Sextent of divertion


fire pump room
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
fire water tank

FFL / 86395 LHA gold LHA gold

electrical
15240

s
ne

motorcycle
li
ht

terrace above
A 1 sig A
crossfall max 1:40 E / 88200
RL / 85795
E / 90679
RL / 86395 rise 600 detention tank

comms bulky goods


E / 86034

ramp max 1:20 E / 86696


RL / 86150
rise 355

TBC
ADG side setback driveway

S
E / 87981 E / 86151
water tank L00-03 habitable 6m building above RL / 85795 RL / 86150
min 10,000L TPZ
A/H A/H 12.08 sq m

boundary 19m 319°21'


above above 8.8% E / 86351
sig
1 E / 88147 ht 1
ADG side setback L00-03 lin
building above e s
Lot 375 non habitable 3m

S
DP 752067
3000

Site Area 1458.2sqm


Site Area 1538.87sqm T40
post post
(inc additional piece of land) H7 E / 88952 E / 88305 E / 87559
boundary 72.505m 49°21'
adjoining building setback 5.501m

Setout T31 T30 T29 T27

existing con
T41 brick retaining wall underground parking approx H9 SMH H9 T24

sign post
Point DP 15806 H12 H9 T22

exi
H10

S
H9 H14

stin

adjoining building setback


gc
91000
tour

exis
existin

ont
ex

tour 91000
91000

is
existin

ting
existing con

our
tin
90000

driveway above ramp driveway approx gc


contour

gc

890
con
on
tou
gc
91000

ur
ontour

00
onto

tou
balcony above T37 r8 c
ontour

80 ting

r 90
existing

H10 raised patio 00 exis 0


8700

000
balcony below
balcony above

balcony above
B D C
11 McMillan Road 11 McMillan Road
three storey apartment building three storey apartment building
9285 19020 28070 8505
T42
A B C D
H11

LEGEND ABBREVIATION LEGEND TREE LEGEND


site boundary s storage T00 arborist report tree number
site setback A/H access hatch tree protection zone
0
rth

grid lines structural root zone


LEVELS LEGEND
no

driveway / carparking TPZ encroachment


FFL / 100 finished floor level (mm)
common landscaped area
E / 100 existing ground level (mm)
0 5m RL / 100 relative level (mm)
1:100 @ A1 / 1:200 @ A3 P / 100 proposed ground level (mm)

2205 - SD 01 PLANS [Link]


project architect: specialist housing title: job no - sheet no - revision:

KENNEDY ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON LEVEL -01 BASEMENT 2205 - DA-06 - P17
level 3 / 1 booth street annandale 2038
nominated architect - anthony nolan - 6773 date:
p + 61 2 9557 6466
16/12/22 PRELIMINARY
APPENDIX B
Sidra Intersection Analysis

LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS PTY LTD


Table B1 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with MCMillan Road
AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions

Table B2 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with MCMillan Road


AM Peak Hour Post Development

Table B3 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with MCMillan Road


PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions
Table B4 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with MCMillan Road
PM Peak Hour Post Development

Table B5 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with Jersey Road


AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions

Table B6 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with Jersey Road


AM Peak Hour Post Development

Table B7 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with Jersey Road


PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions

Table B8 Movement Summary of Abbott Road with Jersey Road


PM Peak Hour Post Development
APPENDIX C
Swept Path Analysis

LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS PTY LTD


HAM
PDE
NL
ANE
850 clear
RL / 85550
bins bikes walkway max 1:20
rise 245
RL / 85795 RL / 85550

1500

1500
RL / 85550
3200 x 5400 3200 x 5400

s s s s
pumpset
FFL / 85795

building above
room
fire pump room
fire water tank

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
FFL / 86395 LHA gold LHA gold

electrical

motorcycle
850 clear

1
crossfall max 1:40 RL / 85795
RL / 86395 rise 600 detention tank

comms bulky goods

ramp max 1:20


RL / 86150
rise 355
driveway
water tank RL / 85795 RL / 86150

A/H min 10,000L A/H


above above

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS ENTRY AT BASEMENT


SCALE 1:100

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION


3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON, NSW
THIS DRAWING IS THE C PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS ENTRY
PROPERTY OF LOKA Copyright 3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON, B.V. B.V.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Loka NSW AT BASEMENT
AND MUST NOT BE
N
Consulting 1 : 100 U.N.O 21NL243
RETAINED, COPIED OR USED
Engineers
A FOR COORDINATION B.V. B.V. 19-12-22 WITHOUT THE WRITTEN COPYRIGHT: THIS DESIGN AND PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED WHOLLY
CONSENT AUTHORITY:
as date of OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS
CONSENT OF THE COMPANY WILLOUGHBY CITY COUNCIL NERMEIN LOKA T01 A
issue
HAM
PDE
NL
ANE
850 clear
RL / 85550
bins bikes walkway max 1:20
rise 245
RL / 85795 RL / 85550

1500

1500
RL / 85550
3200 x 5400 3200 x 5400

s s s s
pumpset
FFL / 85795

building above
room
fire pump room
fire water tank

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
FFL / 86395 LHA gold LHA gold

electrical

motorcycle
850 clear

1
crossfall max 1:40 RL / 85795
RL / 86395 rise 600 detention tank

comms bulky goods

ramp max 1:20


RL / 86150
rise 355
driveway
water tank RL / 85795 RL / 86150

A/H min 10,000L A/H


above above

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS EXIT AT BASEMENT


SCALE 1:100

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION


3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON, NSW
THIS DRAWING IS THE C PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS EXIT
PROPERTY OF LOKA Copyright 3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON, B.V. B.V.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Loka NSW AT BASEMENT
AND MUST NOT BE
N
Consulting 1 : 100 U.N.O 21NL243
RETAINED, COPIED OR USED
Engineers
A FOR COORDINATION B.V. B.V. 19-12-22 WITHOUT THE WRITTEN COPYRIGHT: THIS DESIGN AND PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED WHOLLY
CONSENT AUTHORITY:
as date of OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS
CONSENT OF THE COMPANY WILLOUGHBY CITY COUNCIL NERMEIN LOKA T02 A
issue
850 clear
RL / 85550
bins bikes walkway max 1:20
rise 245
RL / 85795 RL / 85550

1500

1500
RL / 85550
3200 x 5400 3200 x 5400

s s s s
pumpset
FFL / 85795

building above
room
fire pump room

fire water tank


8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
FFL / 86395 LHA gold LHA gold

electrical

motorcycle
850 clear

1
crossfall max 1:40 RL / 85795
RL / 86395 rise 600 detention tank

comms bulky goods WAITING BAY


ramp max 1:20
RL / 86150
rise 355
driveway
water tank RL / 85795 RL / 86150

A/H min 10,000L A/H WAITING BAY


above above

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS TWO VEHICLES PASSING EACH


OTHERS AT BASEMENT

850 clear
RL / 85550
bins bikes walkway max 1:20
rise 245
RL / 85795 RL / 85550

1500

1500
RL / 85550
3200 x 5400 3200 x 5400

s s s s
pumpset
FFL / 85795

building above
room
fire pump room
fire water tank

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
FFL / 86395 LHA gold LHA gold

electrical
motorcycle

850 clear

1
crossfall max 1:40 RL / 85795
RL / 86395 rise 600 detention tank

comms bulky goods WAITING BAY


ramp max 1:20
RL / 86150
rise 355
driveway
water tank RL / 85795 RL / 86150

A/H min 10,000L A/H WAITING BAY


above above

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS TWO VEHICLES PASSING EACH


OTHERS AT GROUND FLOOR
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON, NSW
THIS DRAWING IS THE C PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT
PROPERTY OF LOKA Copyright 3 ABBOTT ROAD, ARTARMON, SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS TWO B.V. B.V.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
AND MUST NOT BE
Loka NSW N VEHICLES PASSING
Consulting 1 : 100 U.N.O 21NL243
RETAINED, COPIED OR USED
Engineers EACH OTHER
A FOR COORDINATION B.V. B.V. 19-12-22 WITHOUT THE WRITTEN COPYRIGHT: THIS DESIGN AND PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED WHOLLY
CONSENT AUTHORITY:
as date of OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF LOKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS
CONSENT OF THE COMPANY WILLOUGHBY CITY COUNCIL NERMEIN LOKA T03 A
issue

You might also like