0% found this document useful (0 votes)
293 views52 pages

Highrise Building Design Considerations

The document outlines considerations for high-rise building design, focusing on parking systems, circulation methods, and structural requirements. It includes specifications for various types of ramps and parking layouts, as well as details on vertical transportation systems such as elevators and escalators. Case studies of notable high-rise buildings in Dhaka, Seoul, and Barcelona are also presented, highlighting their architectural features and parking solutions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
293 views52 pages

Highrise Building Design Considerations

The document outlines considerations for high-rise building design, focusing on parking systems, circulation methods, and structural requirements. It includes specifications for various types of ramps and parking layouts, as well as details on vertical transportation systems such as elevators and escalators. Case studies of notable high-rise buildings in Dhaka, Seoul, and Barcelona are also presented, highlighting their architectural features and parking solutions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

NATIONAL : SOUTH BREEZE SQUARE, DHAKA

LIGHT-HOUSE, DHAKA

INTERNATIONAL : S-TRENUE TOWER, SEOUL, SOUTH KORE

PUIG TOWER, BARCELONA, SPAIN

HIGHRISE CASE STUDY


CONSIDERATION FOR A HIGHRISE BUILDING

PARKING
• SURFACE PARKING
 CORE • BASEMENT PARKING
• MULTI-STORIED PARKING
 MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL • AUTOMATED PARKING
SERVICES
 STRUCTURE
 PARKING AND CIRCULATION CIRCULATION
 HVAC SYSTEM VERTICAL CIRCULATION
 LOAD • ELEVATOR
• ESCALATOR
 WATER TREATMENT AND PLUMBING
 STRUCTURE • STAIRS – PUBLIC STAIRS
SERVICE STAIRS
FIRE ESCAPING STAIRS
BASEMENT PARKING ACCORDING TO BNBC

• PARKING RAMP SLOPE < 1:8


• CONTINUOUS RAMP LENGTH IN ONE DIRECTION < 39’-4”
• DISTANCE BETWEEN RAMP ENTRY AND ROAD > 14’-9”
• CLEAR HEIGHT BETWEEN RAMP AND UPPER FLOOR > 7’4”
• RAMP FOR ONE WAY TRAFFIC SHOULD BE 9.84’
• RAMP FOR BOTHWAY TRAFFIC SHOULD BE 13.94’
• 1 CAR IS REQUIRED PER 200 SQFT
RAMP TYPE
RECTANGULAR RAMP AND
PARKING

• USUALLY RECTANGULAR SHAPED PARKING AND RAMP GOES WELL


ALONG THE STRUCTURE’S LONGER SIDE DIMENSION.
• MORE HORIONTAL SPACE IS REQUIRED TO SATISFY RAMP GRADE
CRITERIA THAN ACCOMMODATE VEHICULAR MOVEMENT BETWEEN
RAMP ENDS.
• REQUIRES LESS FLOOR AREA AND SIMPLE AND ECONOMICAL TO
CONSTRUCT.
• CAUSE DIFFICULTIES TO GET ON AND OFF THE STRAIGHT RAMP.
• HAVING TWO WAY LANES ON PARKING FLOOR MAYBE HAZARDOUS.
• UP AND DOWN LANES INTESECT ON THE PARKING FLOOR UNLESS
THE FLOOR AREA IS SO LARGE THAT EACH CIRCULATION CAN BE
CURVE RAMP AND PARKING

• SINGLE SURFACES THAT PERMITS VEHICLES TO CIRCULATE ON A CONTINUOUS HELICAL PATH BETWEEN
PARKING LEVELS.
• MOVEMENT : UP- COUNTER-CLOCKWISE, DOWN- COUNTER-CLOCKWISE, ENTRANCE AND EXIT ON THE SIDE.
• FIT NARROW SITE BUT WASTE MORE SPACE.
• DIRECTLY ABOVE EACH OTHER ON SUCCEEDING FLOORS.
• SHOULD BE CLEARWAY TYPE.
• CONTINUOUS 360 DEGREE ROTATION BETWEEN TWO PARKING LEVELS.
• CSTLY CONSTRUCTION.
• OFFER BETTER TRAFFIC OPERATION BY PROVIDING GRADUAL TURNING AS COMPARED TO SHARP TURNING.
• DRIVERS HAVE A CLEAR VIEW EACH WAY EVEN WHEN THERE IS A CROSSING OF PARKING ON EACH
PARKING FLOOR.
RAMP AND PARKING
SYSTEM
CLEARWAY PARKING PARALLEL RAMP DESIGN

• • UP AND DOWN RAMP SLOPE IN THE SAME


INTERFLOOOR TRAVEL PATH COMPLETELY
SEPARATED FROM POTENTIALLY DIRECTION.
• RAMP SURFACES ARE PARALLEL.
CONFLICTING PARKING – UNPARKING
• VEHICLES MUST ROTATE IN OPPOSITE
MOVEMENTS.
• PROVIDE SAFEST MOVEMENT WITH LEAST DIRECTIONS.
• CHEAPER TO CONSTRUCT.
DELAY.
• PREFERRED FOOR SELF PARKING DESIGN.
ADJASCENT
• FEASABLEPARKING
FOR SMALL CLEARWAY RAMP.

• PART OR ALL TRAVEL IS PERFORMED ON


CLEARWAY PARKING ADJASCENT PARKING
ACCESS AISLES.
• REQUIRES LESS AREA PER PARKING STALL.
• TWOFOLD USE OF TRAVEL PATH.
• FEASABLE FOR SMALLER LAND PARCEL.
• HAS POTENTIAL IN CAUSING ACCIDENTS.

OPPOSED RAMP DESIGN CLEARWAY PARKING ADJASCENT PARKING


• VEHICLES ROTATE IN THE SAME DIRECTION.
• UP AND DOWN RAMPS ARE IN OPPOSITE
DIRECTION.
• REQUIRED RAMP SURFACES TO BE OPPOSED.
• THE OPERATION IS SAFER.
OPPOSED RAMP DESIGN PARALLEL RAMP DESIGN
PARKING LAYOUT AND
ANGLES
0 DEGREE/PARALLEL PARKING
• PARALLEL PARKING REQUIRES EXPERIENCE,
CONFIDENCE AND PATIENCE.
• PARKING SPACES – 7.5*2.75 M
ADVANTAGES :
 WORKS WELL IN NARROW SPACES.
 REQUIRES MINIMUM PAVEMENT AREA.
DISADVANTAGES :
 DIFFICULTY IN MANEUVERING.
 LESS THAN IDEAL VISIBILITY OF ADJASCENT
TRAFFIC.
 INEFFICIENT USE OF ON-STREET SPACE.
90 DEGREE PARKING
• MOST EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL.
• DIMENSIONS – 6*2.75 M
DRIVING AISLES WIDTH (2 WAY) – 7M
TWO ROWS PLUS AISLE WIDTH – 19M
ADVANTAGES :
 WORKS WELL WITH EITHER ONE OR TWO AISLES.
 HANDLES THE MOST VEHICLES PER SQUARE FT.
DISADVANTAGES :
 REQUIRES WIDEST AREA.
 TWO WAY TRAFFIC CAN CREATE PROBLEMS WITH
VISIBILITY.
60 DEGREE PARKING
• IDEAL FOR FAST TURNOVER RATE OR PREDOOMINANTLY SHORT
TERM USE.
• OFTEN OFFSET BY INEFFICIENT CIRCULATION PATTERNS AND ONE
WAY AISLES.
• DIMENSIONS – 6*2.75M
DRIVING AISLES WIDTH (1 WAY) – 5.5M
TWO ROWS PLUS AISLE WIDTH – 16.5M

ADVANTAGES :
 IN AND OUT MADE EASIER.
 GOOD VISIBILITY.
 LENDS ITSELF WITH EITHER ONE OR TWO WAY AISLES.
 MOST COMMON SHOORT TIME PARKING SOLUTION.
DISADVANTAGES :
 REQUIRES MORE PAVEMENT PER VEHICLE THAN 90 DEGREE.
 HANDLES LESS VEHICLES PER LINEAR MITRE.
45 DEGREE PARKING
• SIMILAR BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS AS 60
DEGREE PARKING.
• DIMENSIONS – 6*2.75M
DRIVING AISLES WIDTH (1 WAY) – 4.5M
TWO ROWS PLUS AISLE WIDTH – 14M
ESCALATORS
VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION COMMON PATTERN OF ESCALATORS:
ELEVATORS A. 25° INCLINATION
B. 30° INCLINATION
Sizes & capacity of Hydraulic elevators C. 35° INCLINATION

STANDARD ESCALATOR STEP


WIDTHS:

HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR ELECTRIC ELEVATOR


1.5*LIFT LENGTH = LOBBY SPACE
STAIR
THREE TYPES OF STAIR: (BASED ON FUNCTION)
[Link] STAIR
[Link] STAIR
[Link] ESCAPING STAIR

GENERAL RULES OF RISER AND TREAD FOR PUBLIC


BUILDING:
RISER: 140-160 MM
TREAD: 280-320 MM
WIDTH OF THE STAIR: 150-250 MM

GENERAL RULES OF RISER & TREAD FOR OFFICE:


RISER: NOT GREATER THAN 190MM.
TREAD: NOT LESS THAN 250 MM.
NO OF RISERS IN A FLIGHT: NOT MORE THAN 16
General information
LOCATION : 52, GULSHAN AVE, DHAKA 1212
HEIGHT : 2114.17 FT
FLOOR : ABOVE GROUND – 14
BELOW GROUND - 3
PROJECT CONSULTANT : ARC ARCHITECTURAL
CONSULTANTSZ
BUILDING TYPE : HIGH-RISE BUILDING
MAIN USAGE : COMMERCIAL
CLIENT : SOUTH BREEZE HOUSING LTD

PROJECT ARCHITECT :NAHAS AHMED KHALIL


Ar. FARZAD EHSAN
Ar. REHMAN TAKI FERDOUS

SOUTH BREEZE SQUARE


GROUND FLOOR
PLAN SEMI BASEMENT ENTRY

OFFICE

101561 SQFT LOBBY

BASEMENT ENTRY

MAIN ENTRY
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN
OFFICE AREA

1:4 CORE TO OFFICE


RATIO
BASEMENT 1 PLAN

SEMI BASEMENT OFFICE

34% RAMP CIRCULATION


BASEMENT
CIRCULATION

DN PARKING
CLEARWAY PARKING

DRIVER’S WAITING
PARKING

BASEMENT
CIRCULATIO
48% RAMP CIRCULATION
N

PARKING
(STACK)

RAMP 17’

DN

BASEMENT-1 PARKING
BASEMENT-2 PARKING
BASEMENT-3 PARKING
22’
FIRE STAIR FOR OFFICERS (11.5 ft)

FIRE STAIR FOR OUTSIDERS (11.5


ft)
17’ 25’

28’

FIRE LOBBY (12.5*28 ft)

TYPICAL FLOOR
PLAN
PICTURES
NATIONAL CASE STUDY
SIMPLE TREE
LIGHTHOUSE
ARCHITECTS: VOLUME
ZERO
LOCATION: KEMAL ATATURK
AVENUE DHAKA 1212
YEAR: 2018
SITE AREA: 1746 M²
AREA: 9962 M²
FLOORS: 20
SIMPLETREE LIGHTHOUSE
LOCATION
FORM

APPROACHED THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE, THE FORM SEEMS TO BE A PLAY OF


PLANES LAYERED WITHIN. A HIERARCHY OF TACTILITY EXPRESSES ITSELF IN
THESE PLANES, BEGINNING WITH A CONCRETE PLATE THAT FOLDS AT THE
CROWN, AND FOLLOWED WITHIN WITH PLANES OF GLASS AND LOUVERED
SPACE

AS PART OF AN URBAN FABRIC, POCKETS OF GARDENS HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED


THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING OPENING UP TO BECOMING URBAN WINDOWS. THESE POCKETS
OF GREEN SPACE WITHIN WORKSPACE FLOORS PROVIDE A TRANQUIL BREAK FROM THE RACE
AGAINST TIME. THE TREE FROM THE BASEMENT LEVEL PENETRATES THE GROUND LEVEL AND
SIMILAR TREES SHALL EMERGE TO REPEAT THEIR PRESENCE THROUGH LEVELS IN THE TALL
BUILDING, ALMOST AS IF NATURE IS FINDING ITS WAY THROUGH A MAN-MADE STRUCTURE TO
COEXIST. THE PLATES FOLD AND TERMINATE AT THE CROWN WITH A HINT OF THE STRUCTURE
GROUND FLOOR PLAN

FIRE
EXIT

01 TOILET
02 STAIR
03 LIFT AREA
04 COMMERCIAL OFFICE
05 ENTRY LOUNGE
06 CONTROL ROOM
07 RAMP
08 ELECTRICAL LINE CABINET
09 SERVICE ENTRY
10 FIRE STAIR
PARKING
ENTRY

RO
AD
GROUND FLOOR

MAIN ENTRY ENTRY LOBBY RECEPTION

GUARD ROOM
BASEMENT
PARKING
CIRCULATION

CORE
PARKING
DRIVER
WAITING
ROOM
• TOTAL 48 CAR PARKING ( REQUIRED 44)
• SEPARATE SPACE FOR CYCLE AND
MOTORCYCLES
• BASEMENT-1 FOR CAR STAYING FOR 30-60 MINS
• BASEMENT 2-4 FOR LONGER PERIOD PARKING

RAMP TYPE: STRAIGHT RAMP


TYPICAL FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN
24% CORE

6.5’ * 5.5’

5 FT LIFT LOBBY

[Link]
[Link] SPACE
[Link]
TYPICAL FLOOR

VERANDA LIFT LOBBY DB ROOM


15TH FLOOR PLAN

[Link] GARDEN
[Link]
3.D.B. ROOM
[Link]
[Link]
[Link] SPACE FOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR
7. STAIR FOR M&E FLOOR
15TH FLOOR PLAN

PUNCH FOR TREE

CIRCULAR STAIR ROOF GARDEN


M&E FLOOR PLAN - 16TH FLOOR

[Link] PUMP
[Link] MACHINE
ROOM
3. SUPERVISOR
SEATING AREA
CORE

CORE TYPE: END CORE

01 STAIR
02 FIRESTAIR
03 ELECTRICAL LINE
CABINET
04 LIFT
05 SERVICE LIFT
06 LIFT LOBBY
07 MANAGER
BATHROOM
08 GENT’S BATHROOM
09 LADIE’S BATHROOM
3
1
FLOOR DISTRIBUTION
MECHANICAL FLOOR
MANAGING
DIRECTOR ROOM &
ROOF GARDEN

COMMERCIAL
FLOOR

BASEMET
PARKING
BASEMENT PARKING
PUIG TOWER
BARCELONA , SPAIN

ARCHITECTS: ANTONIO PUIG, JOSEP RIU


ARCHITECTS, LUCHO MARCIAL, RAFAEL MONEO

HEIGHT : 109 M
FLOORS : 22
BASEMENT ENTRY

MAIN ENTRY

SECONDARY ENTRY
VERTICAL CIRCULATION

BASEMENT

PARKING

• 3 floor basement
• Each floor has 14500 sqft parking
space
• Each floor has 50 car parking
capacity

SECTION
PARKING SPACE

RAMP

PARKING AREA

FUNCTIONAL AREA

CORE

BASEMENT PLANT
TWO WAY STRAIGHT RAMP
60ft x 16.4ft

CIRCULATION SPACE
12ft

PARKING CIRCULATION
CORE

OFFICE AREA

VERTICAL
CIRCULATION

• Floor area 5000 sqft


• Core area 1024 sqft
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN • Circulation area 100 sqft
4 PASSENGER
LIFT
6ft x 4.5ft
1 SERVICE
LIFT
7ft x 6.5ft

STAIR
4ft width
S-TRENUE TOWER
•ARCHITECTS: MASS STUDIES

•LOCATION : SEOUL, SOUTH


KOREA

•TYPE : APARTMENT; OFFICE


BUILDING

•AREA : 2931 M²

•FLOOR AREA : 39.899 M²

•HEIGHT : 154.14M

•BASEMENT LEVEL : 7

•SUPERSTRUCTURE LEVEL : 36

•YEAR : 2006
APPROACH & ACCESS APPROACH TO BASEMENT
(FOR CARS)

• DROPOFF (30’ x 24’)


APPROACH TO
• MAIN ENTRANCE
• ENTRY WAY FOR CAR
BASEMENT(HELLICAL
• EXIT WAY FOR CAR PARALLEL RAMP 24’
WIDTH)
BASEMENT 1 BASEMENT 7
LEVEL 1- SUPER STRUCTURE 4 :COMMUNITY LEVEL 2-7 : PARKING( 20’ x 9’)
CONVENIENCES MECHANICAL
ROOMS

• ENTRY WAY FOR CAR


• EXIT WAY FOR CAR
• PREFERRED SLOPE FOR A
BUILDING ACCESS RAMP IS
BETWEEN 7 AND 15 DEGREES
• A PARKING RAMP
SLOPE OF 5 DEGREE OR
LESS IS PREFERRED
ALTHOUGH PARKING RAMP
SLOPES UP TO 7 DEGREE
ARE TOLERATED BY THE
PUBLIC IN VERY DENSE
URBAN AREAS
PARKING ( DOUBLE SIDED 90 DEGREE PARKING)
CIRCULATION

• PASSENGER LIFT (8’ X 8’)


• SERVICE LIFT (8’ X 8’)
• STAIR 1 (8’ X 16’)
• STAIR 2 (16’ X 13’)
• FIRE STAIR (8’ X 16’)
• ESCALATOR
• PASSENGER LIFT (8’ X 8’)
• SERVICE LIFT (8’ X 8’)
• STAIR 1 (8’ X 16’)
• STAIR 2 (16’ X 13’)
• FIRE STAIR (8’ X 16’)
• ESCALATOR

2ND FLOOR
2ND FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 30TH FLOOR
30TH
PLAN
FLOOR PLAN

9TH9TH
FLOOR PLAN
FLOOR PLAN 36TH FLOOR PLAN
PRESENTED TO :
RAHANAT ARA SHUCHONA
TAZIA RAHMAN

PRESENTED BY :
1806010
1806008
1806013
1806014
1806027

THANK YOU

You might also like