Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2505.11628

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2505.11628 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 May 2025 (v1), last revised 26 Sep 2025 (this version, v3)]

Title:Critique-Guided Distillation for Efficient and Robust Language Model Reasoning

Authors:Berkcan Kapusuzoglu, Supriyo Chakraborty, Chia-Hsuan Lee, Sambit Sahu
View a PDF of the paper titled Critique-Guided Distillation for Efficient and Robust Language Model Reasoning, by Berkcan Kapusuzoglu and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with expert demonstrations often suffers from the imitation problem, where models reproduce correct responses without internalizing the underlying reasoning. We propose Critique-Guided Distillation (CGD), a multi-stage training framework that augments SFT with teacher-generated explanatory critiques and refined responses. Instead of directly imitating teacher outputs, a student learns to map the triplet of prompt, its own initial response, and teacher critique into the refined teacher response, thereby capturing both what to output and why. Our analyses show that CGD consistently reduces refinement uncertainty, improves alignment between critiques and responses, and enhances sample efficiency. On reasoning benchmarks, CGD achieves substantial gains across LLaMA and Qwen families, including +15.0% on AMC23 and +12.2% on MATH-500, while avoiding the format drift issues observed in prior critique-based fine-tuning. Importantly, on LLaMA-3.1-8B CGD approaches or exceeds the performance of SimpleRL-Zero, which is a DeepSeek-R1 replication, while requiring 60x less compute. Beyond reasoning, CGD maintains or improves general instruction-following and factual accuracy, matching baseline performance on IFEval, MUSR, TruthfulQA, and BBH. In contrast, prior critique-based methods degrade these capabilities (e.g., -21% on IFEval). Taken together, these results establish CGD} as a robust and generalizable alternative to both conventional SFT and RL-based methods, offering a more efficient path toward advancing the reasoning and safety of large language models.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2505.11628 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2505.11628v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.11628
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Berkcan Kapusuzoglu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 16 May 2025 18:45:59 UTC (1,545 KB)
[v2] Thu, 22 May 2025 13:42:06 UTC (1,575 KB)
[v3] Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:35:43 UTC (1,090 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Critique-Guided Distillation for Efficient and Robust Language Model Reasoning, by Berkcan Kapusuzoglu and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status