EFFECTIVENESS OF GADGETS ON STUDENTS' ONLINE DISTANCE LE

TYPE OF DEVICE

Cellphone Only
Desktop Only
Laptop and Cellphone
Cellphone and Desktop
Laptop, Tablet and Cellphone
Laptop, Cellphone and Printer
Laptop, Tablet, Cellphone and Printer
Laptop, Desktop, Cellphone and Printer
All of the devices
TOTAL

EFFECTIVENESS OF GADGETS ON STUDENTS

25

20

15

10

0
Cellphone Only Desktop Only Laptop and Cellphone Cellphone and Laptop, Tablet and
Desktop Cellphone

TOTAL NO. OF STUDENTS USING THE DEVICE Co

Column F Co

Of the 42 students surveyed, most of them have both laptop and cellphone with at total number of 21 students using
"3" , 2 students rated for "5" and only one student rated for "2" for its effectiveness. Next is cellphone only with a
rated for "2" regarding its effectiveness. Followed by a total number of 4 students using laptop, cellphone and prin
"3". Then 3 students also use laptop, tablet and cellphone for their online classes - the first student rated for "3" ,
Of the 42 students surveyed, most of them have both laptop and cellphone with at total number of 21 students using
"3" , 2 students rated for "5" and only one student rated for "2" for its effectiveness. Next is cellphone only with a
rated for "2" regarding its effectiveness. Followed by a total number of 4 students using laptop, cellphone and prin
"3". Then 3 students also use laptop, tablet and cellphone for their online classes - the first student rated for "3" ,
also 2 students who are both using a cellphone and a desktop and both of them rated "3" for its effectiveness. Ano
also rated its effectiveness as "4". There is also a student who uses desktop only and rated its effectiveness as "3".
effectiveness.
ENESS OF GADGETS ON STUDENTS' ONLINE DISTANCE LEARNING
RATINGS
# OF STUDENTS USING THE DEVICE 5 4 3 2 1
NO. OF STUDENTS
7 0 2 4 1 0
1 0 0 1 0 0
21 2 9 9 1 0
2 0 0 2 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0
4 1 2 1 0 0
2 0 2 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0 0 0
42

FFECTIVENESS OF GADGETS ON STUDENTS' ONLINE DISTANCE LEARNING

p Only Laptop and Cellphone Cellphone and Laptop, Tablet and Laptop, Cellphone Laptop, Tablet, Laptop, Desktop, All of the devic
Desktop Cellphone and Printer Cellphone and Printer Cellphone and Printer

TOTAL NO. OF STUDENTS USING THE DEVICE Column D Column E

Column F Column G Column H

ve both laptop and cellphone with at total number of 21 students using the device. Under those 21 students, 9 students rated "4" , 9 students
tudent rated for "2" for its effectiveness. Next is cellphone only with at total of 7 students using it - 4 rated for "3" , 2 students rated for "4" a
owed by a total number of 4 students using laptop, cellphone and printer - 2 students rated for "4" , one student rated for "5" and another stu
nd cellphone for their online classes - the first student rated for "3" , the next one rated for "4" and the other one rated "5" for its effectivene
 ve both laptop and cellphone with at total number of 21 students using the device. Under those 21 students, 9 students rated "4" , 9 students
tudent rated for "2" for its effectiveness. Next is cellphone only with at total of 7 students using it - 4 rated for "3" , 2 students rated for "4" a
owed by a total number of 4 students using laptop, cellphone and printer - 2 students rated for "4" , one student rated for "5" and another stu
nd cellphone for their online classes - the first student rated for "3" , the next one rated for "4" and the other one rated "5" for its effectivene
one and a desktop and both of them rated "3" for its effectiveness. Another 2 students are also using laptop, tablet, cellphone and printer and
so a student who uses desktop only and rated its effectiveness as "3". And lastly, only one student have all the devices mentioned and has ra
effectiveness.
NING

Desktop, All of the devices

ne and Printer

dents rated "4" , 9 students again rated for

" , 2 students rated for "4" and only one
ated for "5" and another student rated for
rated "5" for its effectiveness. There are
dents rated "4" , 9 students again rated for
" , 2 students rated for "4" and only one
ated for "5" and another student rated for
rated "5" for its effectiveness. There are
cellphone and printer and both of them
vices mentioned and has rated "5" for its
 SOURCES OF INTERNET CONNECTION AND IT'S QUALITY
RATINGS
SOURCES OF INTERNET CONNECTION TOTAL 5 4 3 2
NO. OF STUDENTS
Smart-Mobile Data 5 0 1 4 0
Globe-Mobile Data 7 0 1 5 1
Smart Wi-Fi 1 0 0 1 0
Globe Wi-Fi 9 0 3 6 0
PLDT Wi-Fi 10 1 5 4 0
Converge Wi-Fi 7 2 5 0 0
Sky Fiber Wi-Fi 1 0 0 0 1
PLDT (Ethernet Cable) 1 0 1 0 0
PLDT (Mobile Data) 1 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 42

SOURCES OF INTERNET CONNECTION AND

10

0
Smart-Mobile Data Globe-Mobile Data Smart Wi-Fi Globe Wi-Fi PLDT Wi-Fi Converge Wi-

TOTAL NO. OF STUDENTS Column D Column E Column F Column G NO.

 TOTAL NO. OF STUDENTS Column D Column E Column F Column G NO.

Out of the 42 students that was surveyed, most of the students use PLDT Wi-Fi as a source for their internet connec
of them rated "5" as the highest quality, 5 of them rated "4" and the rest of the 4 students rated "3". It is then follow
students rated "3" for the quality and 3 of them rated for "4". Next one is Converge Wi-Fi with a total number of 7
for the quality. The students also use mobile data as a source of internet connection and 7 out of 42 students uses G
rated for "4". Another, is the Smart's mobile data with a total number of 5 students using it - 4 students rated for
student who uses Sky Fiber Wi-Fi for her internet connection and rated "2" for its quality. One student also uses S
PLDT (ethernet cable) and rated it for "4". And lastly, there is also one student who uses PLDT
Y
S
1
ENTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

NECTION AND IT'S QUALITY

Wi-Fi Converge Wi-Fi Sky Fiber Wi-Fi PLDT (Ethernet PLDT (Mobile Data)
Cable)

olumn F Column G NO. OF STUDENTS WHO RATED 1

 Cable)

olumn F Column G NO. OF STUDENTS WHO RATED 1

for their internet connection with a total number of 10 . Under those 10 students, only 1
ated "3". It is then followed by Globe Wi-Fi with a total number of 9 students using it - 6
with a total number of 7 students using it - 5 students rated "4" and 2 students rated "5"
out of 42 students uses Globe's Mobile Data - s rated for "3", 1 rated for "2" and also 1
it - 4 students rated for "3" and only 1 student rated "4" for its quality. There is also a
y. One student also uses Smart Wi-Fi and rated its quality for "3". Another student uses
e student who uses PLDT's mobile data and rated it's quality as "2".
STUDENTS' PREFFERED DELIVERY MODALITY OF CLASSES
TYPE OF DELIVERY MODALITY NO. OF STUDENTS
Asynchronous 22
Synchronous 20
TOTAL 42

STUDENTS' PREFFERED DELIVERY MODALITY OF CLASSES

Synchronous
48% Asynchronous
52%

Out of 42 students who were surveyed, 22 of them prefer asynchronous delivery modality of classes while
20 students prefer to have synchronous type of modality for classes.
 CLASSES

Asynchronous
52%

dality of classes while

es.
 STUDENTS' RATING TO THEIR INSTRUCTOR

RATINGS [Link] STUDENTS

5 39
4 2
3 1
2 0
1 0
TOTAL 42

STUDENTS' RATING TO THEIR INSTRUCTOR

5
7%
4
13%
1
33%

3
20%

2
27%

Of the 42 students surveyed, 39 students have rated "5" to their instructor. 2 students rated for "4"
and only one rated for "3" while no one rated their instructor as "0".
R