0% found this document useful (0 votes)
216 views1 page

Flow Resistance Design Guide for Engineers

FLOW RESISTANCE: A DESIGN GUIDE FOR ENGINEERS
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
216 views1 page

Flow Resistance Design Guide for Engineers

FLOW RESISTANCE: A DESIGN GUIDE FOR ENGINEERS
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2 FLOW RESISTANCE: A DESIGN GUIDE FOR ENGINEERS

application involving distorted flow is unique, it is recommended that experimental


methods be considered when such conditions exist and pressure loss is of importance.
4. Unless otherwise indicated, the data shown herein apply to Newtonian fluids consid-
ered homogeneous, incompressible, and involving neither work nor energy addition.
The pipe or duct walls are considered rigid.
5. For graphs dealing with components involving a change in area, particular attention
should be paid to the graph, whether the value of the pressure loss coefficient is based
on the inlet, minimum, or exit area.
6. The nondimensionality of the parameters of most of the graphs allows their use in any
convenient system of units.
7. The basic reference data given in this book are the static pressure loss coefficients, or
K-factor as used in the US literature. This term can be considered the overall static
pressure loss coefficient for the component of interest. It includes the nonrecoverable
losses within the component as well as the frictional and the recoverable losses. The
frictional losses are usually considered negligible when compared to the nonrecovera-
ble losses and generally are neglected unless stated otherwise in the graphs.
8. If one considers how the pressure loss coefficient 3- is evaluated experimentally, this
becomes evident. It is the measured static pressure drop Ap, divided by the dynamic or
velocity head, p 4 , for the component. Thus,

9. The basic pressure loss equation to be used with the data given in this book is

Ap = ~2, in consistent units


3- -
2

10. The overall static pressure drop is considered a positive quantity if the sign convention
used in this book is followed. Therefore, a static pressure rise, such as in a diffuser,
will show up as negative quantity.
11. The effect of Reynolds number on the pressure loss coefficient is most pronounced at
low values (Re < 10'). At higher values of Re it can be assumed as independent of Re,
unless otherwise stated.
12. When there is no indication of the Reynolds number at which the value of 3- was
obtained, it may be assumed that the given value of !:is virtually independent of Re.
However, in the case of purely laminar flow (Re < 2 . lo3),the value of 3- is only an
approximation.
13. For the determination of Reynolds numbers in noncircular ducts, an equivalent or
hydraulic diameter must be used. It is defined as four times the cross-sectional flow
area divided by the wetted perimeter n, with both measured in a direction perpendicu-
lar to the flow. If as usual, the fluid fills the entire cross-section of the duct, this
definition is equivalent to the relation

14. For a few simple configurations we have the following hydraulic diameter D,,

Common questions

Powered by AI

The guide implies that at very low Reynolds numbers (Re < 10), the pressure loss coefficient changes significantly, necessitating careful design considerations and possibly more detailed analysis or experimentation. For high Reynolds numbers, the coefficient remains relatively stable, simplifying design calculations .

If the Reynolds number is unspecified, the design guide suggests assuming the pressure loss coefficient is independent of the Reynolds number value, especially in turbulent flow conditions. However, in purely laminar flow (Re < 2000), the coefficient is only an approximation .

Experimental methods should be prioritized when dealing with distorted flow conditions where pressure loss is significant, as each application involving distorted flow is unique and may not be accurately represented through theoretical models alone .

The Reynolds number significantly affects the pressure loss coefficient at low values (Re < 10), where its effect is most pronounced. At higher Reynolds numbers, the pressure loss coefficient can generally be assumed to be independent of Re, unless specifically stated otherwise .

Engineers should use an equivalent or hydraulic diameter to determine the Reynolds number in noncircular ducts. This diameter is calculated as four times the cross-sectional flow area divided by the wetted perimeter, both measured perpendicular to the flow .

The design guide uses a sign convention where the overall static pressure drop is positive, making a static pressure rise, like that in diffusers, appear as a negative quantity .

The two main types of pressure losses are nonrecoverable losses and frictional losses. Nonrecoverable losses are primarily accounted for in the pressure loss coefficient, while frictional losses are generally considered negligible and often neglected in calculations unless specifically stated .

Nondimensionality allows the graphs to be used in any convenient system of units, providing flexibility and universality in their application across different engineering contexts .

The K-factor represents the overall static pressure loss coefficient including nonrecoverable and frictional losses within a component, essential for quantifying the total pressure drop in fluid systems .

Engineers should pay particular attention to whether the pressure loss coefficient is based on the inlet, minimum, or exit area when dealing with components involving a change in area .

You might also like